Abstract
Radical prostatectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Although cancer control is the primary goal, secondary outcomes such as continence recovery are of great importance to patients. Thus, it is a challenge for prostate cancer surgeons to optimize continence outcomes without compromising oncologic results. Many high-volume surgeons have demonstrated excellent long-term continence rates in their patients, but early continence is variable and less than ideal even in expert hands. A plethora of individual technical maneuvers exist to optimize early recovery of continence, but as yet there is no composite technique that incorporates the relevant anatomic principles of minimizing damage to the urinary sphincters and their nerves, maximizing functional urethral length, creating a secure and watertight vesicourethral anastomosis, providing circumferential fascioligamentous support to the anastomosis and external sphincter, and ameliorating postoperative bladder descent. Our ten-step approach to collating these individual maneuvers into a unified technique could be used by surgeons to obtain the best possible early recovery of urinary control for their patients, without risking their oncologic outcomes.
Key Points
-
Continence outcomes after radical prostatectomy are excellent in the long term, but there is substantial room for improvement in early outcomes
-
A variety of individual surgical maneuvers have been reported to improve early continence, many of which share common principles
-
These crucial principles are to minimize damage to the urinary sphincters and the neural supply, maximize functional urethral length, create a secure and watertight vesicourethral anastomosis, restore the support structures and prevent bladder descent
-
Our ten recommendations could be used to optimize early continence recovery without compromising oncologic and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J. & Ward, E. Cancer statistics 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 60, 277–300 (2010).
Schroder, F. H. et al. Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. Eur. Urol. 53, 468–477 (2008).
Dasgupta, P., Patil, K., Anderson, C. & Kirby, R. Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 101, 667–668 (2008).
Bianco, F. J. Jr, Scardino, P. T. & Eastham, J. A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 66, 83–94 (2005).
Patel, V. R. et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 59, 702–707.
Marsh, D. W. & Lepor, H. Predicting continence following radical prostatectomy. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2, 248–252 (2001).
Stolzenburg, J. U. et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur. Urol. 51, 629–639 (2007).
Narayan, P. et al. Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J. Urol. 153, 337–341 (1995).
Nemoy, N. J. & Govan, D. E. Urinary continence in the absence of an intact external sphincter. J. Urol. 102, 200–204 (1969).
Strasser, H., Klima, G., Poisel, S., Horninger, W. & Bartsch, G. Anatomy and innervation of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Prostate 28, 24–31 (1996).
Shafik, A. A study of the continence mechanism of the external urethral sphincter with identification of the voluntary urinary inhibition reflex. J. Urol. 162, 1967–1971 (1999).
Hollabaugh, R. S. Jr, Dmochowski, R. R. & Steiner, M. S. Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 49, 426–434 (1997).
Walz, J. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 57, 179–192 (2010).
Myers, R. P., Cheville, J. C. & Pawlina, W. Making anatomic terminology of the prostate and contiguous structures clinically useful: historical review and suggestions for revision in the 21st century. Clin. Anat. 23, 18–29 (2010).
Doll, H. A. et al. Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J. Urol. 147, 1566–1573 (1992).
Rassweiler, J., Teber, D., Kuntz, R. & Hofmann, R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention. Eur. Urol. 50, 969–980 (2006).
MacDiarmid, S. A. Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and management. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2, 209–213 (2001).
Brown, J. A., Elliott, D. S. & Barrett, D. M. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: a comparison of the cost of conservative versus surgical management. Urology 51, 715–720 (1998).
Myers, R. P. Male urethral sphincteric anatomy and radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 18, 211–227 (1991).
Steiner, M. S. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology 44, 530–534 (1994).
Burnett, A. L. & Mostwin, J. L. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J. Urol. 160, 1301–1306 (1998).
Srivastava, A., Grover, S., Sooriakumaran, P., Joneja, J. & Tewari, A. K. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a critical analysis of its impact on urinary continence. Curr. Opin. Urol. 21, 185–194 (2011).
Rocco, F. et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur. Urol. 52, 376–383 (2007).
Rocco, B. et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 51, 996–1003 (2007).
Rocco, F. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 175, 2201–2206 (2006).
Walsh, P. C., Partin, A. W. & Epstein, J. I. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J. Urol. 152, 1831–1836 (1994).
Lepor, H., Kaci, L. & Xue, X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J. Urol. 171, 1212–1215 (2004).
Thuroff, J. W. et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur. Urol. 59, 387–400 (2011).
Katz, R. et al. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J. Urol. 169, 2049–2052 (2003).
Srougi, M., Nesrallah, L. J., Kauffmann, J. R., Nesrallah, A. & Leite, K. R. Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. J. Urol. 165, 815–818 (2001).
Freire, M. P. et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol. 56, 972–980 (2009).
Cambio, A. J. & Evans, C. P. Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur. Urol. 50, 903–913 (2006).
Shelfo, S. W., Obek, C. & Soloway, M. S. Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence. Urology 51, 73–78 (1998).
Lee, S. E. et al. Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68, 137–141 (2006).
Myers, R. P., Goellner, J. R. & Cahill, D. R. Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J. Urol. 138, 543–550 (1987).
Eastham, J. A. et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 156, 1707–1713 (1996).
Steiner, M. S. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the “No-Touch” technique. Curr. Urol. Rep. 1, 20–27 (2000).
Catarin, M. V. et al. The role of membranous urethral afferent autonomic innervation in the continence mechanism after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a clinical and prospective study. J. Urol. 180, 2527–2531 (2008).
Burkhard, F. C. et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence? J. Urol. 176, 189–195 (2006).
John, H., Hauri, D., Leuener, M., Reinecke, M. & Maake, C. Evidence of trigonal denervation and reinnervation after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 165, 111–113 (2001).
Srivastava, A. et al. Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy. Curr. Opin. Urol. 21, 49–59 (2011).
Montorsi, F. et al. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 48, 938–945 (2005).
Nguyen, L., Jhaveri, J. & Tewari, A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J. Urol. 179, 1907–1911 (2008).
van Randenborgh, H., Paul, R., Kubler, H., Breul, J. & Hartung, R. Improved urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy with preparation of a long, partially intraprostatic portion of the membraneous urethra: an analysis of 1013 consecutive cases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 7, 253–257 (2004).
Schlomm, T. et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 60, 320–329 (2011).
Tewari, A. K. et al. Anatomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 106, 1364–1373 (2010).
Finley, D. S., Osann, K., Skarecky, D. & Ahlering, T. E. Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence. Urology 73, 691–696 (2009).
Stolzenburg, J. U. et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur. Urol. 49, 103–112 (2006).
van der Poel, H. G., de Blok, W., Joshi, N. & van Muilekom, E. Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 55, 892–900 (2009).
Tan, G. et al. Optimizing vesicourethral anastomosis healing after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from three techniques in 1900 patients. J. Endourol. 24, 1975–1983 (2010).
Walsh, P. C. & Marschke, P. L. Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 59, 934–938 (2002).
Nguyen, M. M. et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 101, 1135–1139 (2008).
Coelho, R. F. et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 59, 72–80 (2011).
Menon, M., Muhletaler, F., Campos, M. & Peabody, J. O. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J. Urol. 180, 1018–1023 (2008).
Sutherland, D. E. et al. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. J. Urol. 185, 1262–1267 (2011).
Coelho, R. F., Chauhan, S. & Patel, V. R. Re: Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. Eur. Urol. 60, 180–181 (2011).
Surya, B. V., Provet, J., Johanson, K. E. & Brown, J. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J. Urol. 143, 755–758 (1990).
Forster, J. A., Palit, V., Myatt, A., Hadi, S. & Bryan, N. P. Technical description and outcomes of a continuous anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 104, 929–933 (2009).
Williams, S. B. et al. Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol. 58, 875–881 (2010).
Tewari, A. K. et al. Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a “self-cinching” technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J. Endourol. 24, 1645–1650 (2010).
Moran, M. E., Marsh, C. & Perrotti, M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system. J. Endourol. 21, 1175–1178 (2007).
Zorn, K. C. et al. Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 5, 188–194 (2011).
Hemal, A. K., Agarwal, M. M. & Babbar, P. Impact of newer unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture on vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its comparison with polyglecaprone-25 suture: an initial experience. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 44, 125–132 (2012).
Ozu, C. et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy with running vesicourethral anastomosis and early catheter removal: our experience. Int. J. Urol. 16, 487–492 (2009).
Gnanapragasam, V. J., Baker, P., Naisby, G. P. & Chadwick, D. Identification and validation of risk factors for vesicourethral leaks following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol. 12, 948–952 (2005).
Tewari, A., Rao, S. & Mandhani, A. Catheter-less robotic radical prostatectomy using a custom-made synchronous anastomotic splint and vesical urinary diversion device: report of the initial series and perioperative outcomes. BJU Int. 102, 1000–1004 (2008).
Krane, L. S., Bhandari, M., Peabody, J. O. & Menon, M. Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 56, 325–330 (2009).
Tan, G. Y., El Douaihy, Y., Te, A. E. & Tewari, A. K. Scientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 6, 431–453 (2009).
Patel, V. R., Coelho, R. F., Palmer, K. J. & Rocco, B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur. Urol. 56, 472–478 (2009).
Ahlering, T. E., Skarecky, D., Lee, D. & Clayman, R. V. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 170, 1738–1741 (2003).
Joseph, J. V., Rosenbaum, R., Madeb, R., Erturk, E. & Patel, H. R. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J. Urol. 175, 945–951 (2006).
Vipul, R. & Patel, R. T. K. S. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int. 99, 1109–1112 (2007).
Borin, J. F., Skarecky, D. W., Narula, N. & Ahlering, T. E. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 70, 173–177 (2007).
Menon, M. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur. Urol. 51, 648–658 (2007).
Zorn, K. C. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol. 51, 755–763 (2007).
Mottrie, A. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur. Urol. 52, 746–750 (2007).
Murphy, D. G., Kerger, M., Crowe, H., Peters, J. S. & Costello, A. J. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur. Urol. 55, 1358–1366 (2009).
Rocco, B. et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 104, 991–995 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H. S. Dev and A. Srivastava researched data for the article. H. S. Dev, A. Srivastava and P. Sooriakumaran provided substantial contribution to the discussion of content and writing of the article. All authors contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dev, H., Sooriakumaran, P., Srivastava, A. et al. Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence. Nat Rev Urol 9, 189–195 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.2
This article is cited by
-
Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy
Nature Reviews Urology (2021)
-
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes
World Journal of Urology (2020)
-
Surgical Techniques to Optimize Early Urinary Continence Recovery Post Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
Current Urology Reports (2017)
-
Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
World Journal of Urology (2017)
-
Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy
World Journal of Urology (2016)