Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases

Abstract

After nearly 10 years of intense academic and commercial research effort, large genome-wide association studies for common complex diseases are now imminent. Although these conditions involve a complex relationship between genotype and phenotype, including interactions between unlinked loci1, the prevailing strategies for analysis of such studies focus on the locus-by-locus paradigm. Here we consider analytical methods that explicitly look for statistical interactions between loci. We show first that they are computationally feasible, even for studies of hundreds of thousands of loci, and second that even with a conservative correction for multiple testing, they can be more powerful than traditional analyses under a range of models for interlocus interactions. We also show that plausible variations across populations in allele frequencies among interacting loci can markedly affect the power to detect their marginal effects, which may account in part for the well-known difficulties in replicating association results. These results suggest that searching for interactions among genetic loci can be fruitfully incorporated into analysis strategies for genome-wide association studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Multilocus models of disease.
Figure 2: Power to detect genetic association using different search strategies.
Figure 3: Replication of marginal association effects among interacting loci.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips, P.C. The language of gene interaction. Genetics 149, 1167–1171 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Risch, N.J. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405, 847–856 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozaki, K. et al. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-alpha gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat. Genet. 32, 650–654 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roses, A. The genome era begins. Nat. Genet. 33 (Supp 2), 217 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas, D.C. Statistical Methods in Genetic Epidemiology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mackay, T.F. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 11–20 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, S.M., Haines, J.L. & Moore, J.H. The use of animal models in the study of complex disease: all else is never equal or why do so many human studies fail to replicate animal findings? Bioessays 26, 170–179 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Routman, E.J. & Cheverud, J.M. Gene effects on a quantitative trait: Two-locus epistatic effects measured at microsatellite markers and at estimated QTL. Evolution 51, 1654–1662 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Segre, D., Deluna, A., Church, G.M. & Kishony, R. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 77–83 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sing, C.F. & Davignon, J. Role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining normal plasma lipid and lipoprotein variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 37, 268–285 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zerba, K.E., Ferrell, R.E. & Sing, C.F. Complex adaptive systems and human health: the influence of common genotypes of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism and age on the relational order within a field of lipid metabolism traits. Hum. Genet. 107, 466–475 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoh, J. & Ott, J. Mathematical multi-locus approaches to localizing complex human trait genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 701–709 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Culverhouse, R., Suarez, B.K., Lin, J. & Reich, T. A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 461–471 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, J.H. & Ritchie, M.D. The challenges of whole-genome approaches to common diseases. JAMA 291, 1642–1643 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kempthorne, O. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson, C.S., Newman, T.L. & Nickerson, D.A. SNPing in the human genome. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5, 78–85 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohmueller, K.E., Pearce, C.L., Pike, M., Lander, E.S. & Hirschhorn, J.N. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat. Genet. 33, 177–182 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlson, C.S., Eberle, M.A., Kruglyak, L. & Nickerson, D.A. Mapping complex disease loci in whole-genome association studies. Nature 429, 446–452 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Templeton, A.R. Epistasis and complex traits. in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (eds. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D.I. & Wade, M.J.) 41–57 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zondervan, K.T. & Cardon, L.R. The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 89–100 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ioannidis, J.P., Ntzani, E.E., Trikalinos, T.A. & Contopoulos-Ioaunidis, D.G. Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 29, 306–309 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, J.H. The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases. Hum. Hered. 56, 73–82 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sham, P., Bader, J.S., Craig, I., O'Donovan, M. & Owen, M. DNA pooling: A tool for large-scale association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 862–871 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tiwari, H.K. Deriving components of genetic variance for multilocus models. Genet. Epidemiol. 14, 1131–1136 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schlesselman, J.J. Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sham, P. Statistics in Human Genetics (Hodder Arnold, London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clayton, D. Population association. in Handbook of Statistical Genetics (eds. Balding, D.J., Bishop, M. & Cannings, C.) 519–540 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoh, J. et al. Selecting SNPs in two-stage analysis of disease association data: a model-free approach. Ann. Hum. Genet. 64, 413–417 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Marchini, J., Cardon, L.R., Phillips, M.S. & Donnelly, P. The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 36, 512–517 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Wellcome Trust, the US National Institutes of Health and the SNP Consortium for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lon R Cardon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchini, J., Donnelly, P. & Cardon, L. Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat Genet 37, 413–417 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1537

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1537

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing