Abstract
There has been considerable interest in testing Lack's1 hypothesis that the most frequent clutch size should be the one which yields the highest number of viable offspring. Many tests, however, have shown that the clutch size that produces the most fledglings is actually larger than the most frequent size2,3. This discrepancy has been accounted for by suggesting that high fecundity may result in a reduction in fledgling survival1, juvenile survival4, adult survival5,6, subsequent fecundity7 or the fecundity of the offspring8 or, alternatively, that there is a relationship between parent quality or territory quality and brood size9. We evaluate three different methods of determining these costs and conclude that experimental manipulations provide the only reliable means of determining the costs. The collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis, on the island of Gotland forms an isolated population with a remarkably high site fidelity of both adults and young such that the lifetime reproductive success can be assessed with an accuracy rarely possible under natural conditions. Experimental modifications of the actual clutch size showed that the main costs of an enlarged clutch were that the juveniles were less likely to survive, that the subsequent fecundity of the parents was reduced and the offspring had a lower fecundity. Adult survival was unaffected by clutch size.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Lack, D. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers (Clarendon, Oxford, 1954).
Lessells, C. M. J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 669–689 (1986).
Murphy, E. C. & Haukioja, E. Current Ornith. 4, 141–180 (1986).
Perrins, C. M. & Moss, D. J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 695–706 (1975).
Nur, N. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 479–496 (1984).
Reid, M. V. Oecologia 74, 458–467 (1987).
Williams, G. C. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690 (1986).
Anderson, M. Am. Nat. 112, 762–766 (1978).
Högstedt, G. Science 210, 1148–1150 (1980).
Charnov, E. L. & Krebs, J. R. Ibis 116, 217–219 (1974).
Sæther, B.-E. Nature 331, 616–617 (1988).
O'Connor, R. J. in Behavioural Ecology (eds R. M. Sibly & R. H. Smith) 105–142 (Blackwell, Oxford 1985).
Smith, J. M. N. Evolution 35, 1142–1148 (1981).
Sutherland W. J., Grafen, A. & Harvey, P. H. Nature 320, 88 (1986).
Sibly, R. M. & Callow, P. (eds) Physiological Ecology of Animals (Blackwell, Oxford, 1986).
Bennett, P. M. & Harvey, P. H. Nature 333, 216 (1988).
Gustafsson, L. Am. Nat. 128, 761–764 (1986).
Gustafsson, L. Ecology 68, 291–296 (1987).
Pärt, T. & Gustafsson, L. J. Anim. Ecol. (in the press).
Nur, N. Evolution 42, 352–362 (1988).
van Noordwijk, A. J., van Balen, J. H. & Scharloo, W. Neth. J. Zool. 31, 342–372 (1981).
Boyce, M. S. & Perrins, C. M. Ecology 68, 142–153 (1987).
Bell, G. Evolution 38, 300–313 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gustafsson, L., Sutherland, W. The costs of reproduction in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Nature 335, 813–815 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/335813a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/335813a0
This article is cited by
-
Intermittent breeding is associated with breeding group turnover in a cooperatively breeding bird
Oecologia (2020)
-
Variable parental responses to changes in offspring demand have implications for life history theory
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2019)
-
Benefits, costs and trade-offs of nesting habitat selection in Little Penguins
Journal of Ornithology (2019)
-
Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018)
-
Carry-over effects of brood size on morphology, reproduction, and lifespan in barn swallows
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.