|
Read Full Article (file size: 1510063 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 108, NO. D22,
8855,
doi:10.1029/2002JD003107,
2003
Sensitivity of model-simulated summertime precipitation over the Mississippi River Basin to the spatial distribution of initial
soil moisture
Matei Georgescu
Center for Environmental Prediction and Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey,
USA
Christopher P. Weaver
Center for Environmental Prediction and Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey,
USA
Roni Avissar
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Robert L. Walko
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Gonzalo Miguez-Macho
Center for Environmental Prediction and Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey,
USA
Abstract
Using a numerical model, the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), we simulate July precipitation over parts of the
Mississippi River Basin and surroundings for each of three years, 1995–1997, with six different initial soil moisture patterns:
three (control, dry, and wet) with a realistic (observationally based) spatial distribution, and three (control, dry, and
wet) with a horizontally homogeneous distribution. Our goal is to determine the impact on future simulated precipitation of
changing the initial soil moisture spatial distribution. The spatially homogeneous initial soil moisture pattern represents,
in effect, a “wet west/dry east” anomaly imposed on the realistic soil moisture pattern (that reflects the west-to-east climatological
gradient). The impact of this anomaly, i.e., increasing soil moisture in the western half and decreasing it in the eastern
half of the simulation domain, is most pronounced for the dry experiments and weakens nonlinearly with increasing domain-average
initial soil moisture. In the dry regime, the impact is to enhance the total monthly precipitation in both the west and east.
We examine the various terms in the atmospheric moisture budget to interpret these results. The changes in precipitation in
the runs with a homogeneous compared to realistic initial soil moisture spatial pattern are consistent with enhanced evaporation
in the western half of the model domain accompanied by enhanced west-to-east horizontal moisture transport that helps restore
the initially depleted soil moisture in the east. In this manner, the zonal moisture flux acts toward re-establishing the
initial climatological soil moisture pattern of the region, thus acting as a negative feedback mechanism. In addition, the
soil moisture anomaly generally produces diminished meridional moisture transport into the simulation domain from the south
through a decrease in the low-level meridional wind speed. This decrease in meridional flux acts in the same direction as
the zonal flux change in the west, and in the opposite direction to the zonal flux change in the east. Since this change is
most pronounced in the west, it therefore also contributes to the overall negative feedback of the atmospheric dynamics on
the initial soil moisture. The persistence timescale of the impact of this particular soil moisture anomaly pattern on precipitation
is on the order of 3 months in the dry regime. Sensitivity of the results to a change in convection scheme is also explored.
Received 31
October
2002;
accepted 19
June
2003;
published 13
November
2003.
Index Terms: 1854 Hydrology: Precipitation (3354); 1866 Hydrology: Soil moisture; 3322 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Land/atmosphere interactions; 3354 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Precipitation (1854).
Read Full Article (file size: 1510063 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Georgescu, M., C. P. Weaver, R. Avissar, R. L. Walko, and G. Miguez-Macho
(2003),
Sensitivity of model-simulated summertime precipitation over the Mississippi River Basin to the spatial distribution of initial
soil moisture,
J. Geophys. Res.,
108(D22),
8855,
doi:10.1029/2002JD003107.
Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.
|