Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.141

According to Heider, some of his ideas about common-sense psychology presented in The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Heider, 1958) originally came from his academic teacher, Alexius Meinong. However, Heider makes no reference to Meinong in his book. To clarify Meinong’s influence on Heider, we compare Heider’s explication of common-sense psychology with Meinong’s writings, in particular those on ethics. Our results confirm that Heider’s common-sense psychology is informed by Meinong’s psychological analyses in several respects: Heider adopts aspects of Meinong’s theory of emotion, his theory of value, and his theory of responsibility attribution. In addition, Heider more or less continues Meinong’s method of psychological inquiry. Thus, even without Meinong’s name attached, many aspects of Meinong’s psychology found their way into today’s social psychology via Heider. Unknowingly, some of us have been Meinongians all along.

References

  • Brentano, F. (1874/1955). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from the empirical point of view] (Vol. 1, edited by O. Kraus). Hamburg: Meiner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chrudzimski, A. (2007). Gegenstandstheorie und Theorie der Intentionalität bei Alexius Meinong [Alexius Meinong’s theory of objects and theory of intentionality]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eaton, H. O. (1930). The Austrian philosophy of values. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ehrenfels, C. (1897). System der Werttheorie [System of value theory]. Leipzig: Reisland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fabian, R. , & Simons, P. M. (1986). The second Austrian school of value theory. In B. Smith, W. Grassl, (Eds.), Austrian economics: Historical and philosophical background (pp. 37–101). New York: New York University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fincham, F. D. , Jaspars, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 81–138). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Findlay, J. N. (1963). Meinong’s theory of objects and values (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garrett, H. E. (1939). Lewin’s topological psychology: An evaluation. Psychological Review, 46, 517–524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, J. H. , Ickes, W. J. , Kidd, R. F. (Eds.)(1976). New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1920). Zur Subjektivität der Sinnesqualitäten [On the subjectivity of sense qualities]. Unpublished dissertation, University of Graz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1926). Ding und Medium [Thing and medium]. Symposion, 1, 109–157. Reprint 2005, Berlin: Kadmos Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1970). Gestalt theory: Early history and reminiscences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 6, 131–139. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1983). The life of a psychologist: An autobiography. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (Ed. Marijana Benesh-Weiner). (1987–1989). “The notebooks,” Vols. 1–6. München: PVU. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. (Ed. Marijana Benesh-Weiner). (1988). “The notebooks,” Vol. 5: Attributional and interpersonal evaluation. München: PVU. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heider, F. , & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 234–259. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Höfler, A. (1897). Psychologie [Psychology]. Wien: Tempsky. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kindinger, R. (1968). Vorwort [Preface]. In R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. III, pp. VII–XIII). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lambert, K. (1995). Substitution and the expansion of the world. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 49, 129–143. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laucken, U. (1999). “An exceptionally important publication”: Fritz Heider (1896–1988). Berichte aus dem Institut zur Erforschung von Mensch-Umwelt-Beziehungen, 31, Universität Oldenburg. [A shortened version of this essay is published as: Laucken, U. (2000). Fritz Heider: The psychology of interpersonal relations (1958). In H. E. Lück, R. Miller, G. Sewz-Vosshenrich, (Hrsg.) Klassiker der Psychologie [Classics of psychology] (pp. 203–208). Stuttgart/Berlin/Köln: Kohlhammer]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mackenzie, J. S. (1895). Notes on the theory of value. Mind, 4, 425–449. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGraw, K. M. (1987). Guilt following transgression: An attribution of responsibility approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 247–256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1894). Psychologisch-ethische Untersuchungen zur Werth-Theorie [Psychological-ethical investigations in value theory]. Graz, Austria: Leuschner & Lubensky. Reprinted in R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Eds.). (1968). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. III, pp. 3–244). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1906a). Über die Erfahrungsgrundlagen unseres Wissens [On the empirical basis of our knowledge]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [Reprinted in R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Eds.). (1973). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. V, pp. 369–481). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1906b). Über Urteilsgefühle: Was sie sind und was sie nicht sind [On judgment-based feelings: What they are and what they are not]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 6, 22–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1910). Über Annahmen [On assumptions] (2nd ed.). Leipzig, Austria: Barth. Reprinted in R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Eds.). (1977). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. IV). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1912). Für die Psychologie und gegen den Psychologismus in der allgemeinen Werttheorie [For psychology and against psychologism in the general theory of value]. Logos, 3, 1–14. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1917). Über emotionale Präsentation [On emotional presentation]. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 183, 2–181. [Reprinted in R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Eds.). (1968). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. III, pp. 285–465). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1919). Allgemeines zur Lehre von den Dispositionen [On the general theory of dispositions]. In A. Martinak, (Ed.), Beiträge zur Pädagogik und Dispositionstheorie. Eduard Martinak zur Feier seines 60. Geburtstages [Contributions to the theory of dispositions] (pp. 33–54). Prag: Haase. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meinong, A. (1923). Zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Werttheorie [On the foundations of general value theory]. Graz, Austria: Leuschner and Lubensky. [Reprinted in R. Haller, R. Kindinger, (Hg.) (1968), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe Band III [Alexius Meinong’s complete works] (Vol. III, pp. 471–656). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, W.-U. , Reisenzein, R. , Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mulligan, K. (2003). Dispositions, their bases and correlates: Meinong’s analysis. In K. Kijania-Placek, (Ed.), Philosophy and logic: In search of the Polish tradition. Essays in honour of Jan Wolenski on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 193–211). Dordrecht: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, W. (1926). General theory of value. New York: Longmans, Green. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reicher, M. E. (2005). Wertgefühle [Value feelings]. In A. Frühwirth, M. E. Reicher, P. Wilhelmer, (Eds.), Markt-Wert-Gefühle: Positionen und Perspektiven einer multidisziplinären Wertdebatte [Market-value emotions: Positions and perspectives of a multidisciplinary value debate]. Vienna: Passagen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reisenzein, R. , Meyer, W.-U. , Schützwohl, A. (2003). Einführung in die Emotionspsychologie, Band III: Kognitive Emotionstheorien [Introduction to the psychology of emotion, Vol. 3: Cognitive theories of emotion]. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reisenzein, R. , Rudolph, U. (2008). The discovery of common-sense psychology. Social Psychology, 39, 125–133. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, B. (1904). Meinong’s theory of complexes and assumptions. Mind, 13, 204–219 (Part 1); 336–354 (Part 2); 509–524 (Part 3). First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satris, S. (1982). The theory of value and the rise of ethical emotivism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 43, 109–128. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönpflug, W. (2008). Fritz Heider – My academic teacher and his academic teachers: Heider’s “Seminar in Interpersonal Relations” and comments on his European background. Social Psychology, 39, 134–140. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schönpflug, W. , Heidelberger, M. (2007). Kurt Lewin und seine Lehrer Alois Riehl und Ernst Cassirer: Wissenschaftliche Philosophie, Erkenntnistheorie und Feldtheorie [Kurt Lewin and his teachers Alois Riehl and Ernst Cassirer]. In W. Schönpflug, (Ed.), Kurt Lewin – Person und Werk, Umfeld und Rezeption [Kurt Lewin – Person and work, context, and reception]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shaw, M. E. , & Sulzer, J. L. (1964). An empirical test of Heider’s levels in attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 39–46. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, M. (1989). Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 63, 89–111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Urban, W. M. (1909). Valuation: Its nature and laws. London: Allen & Unwin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Werner, M. H. (2002). Verantwortung [Responsibility]. In M. Düwell, C. Hübenthal, M. H. Werner, (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik [Handbook of ethics] (pp. 521–527). Stuttgart: Metzler. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Witasek, S. (1908). Grundlinien der Psychologie [Outline of psychology]. Leipzig: Felix Meiner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar