Abstract
Abstract. The study aims to identify differences in the emotional indicators attributable to cultural variables in the Two Human Figures Test (T2F) of Maganto and Garaigordobil (2009) and to obtain standards of the test for the Indian Yaqui children (Mexico). A representative sample of 654 children aged 5–11 years was used. We conducted a validation study of the emotional items for this sample that met the three criteria established by the authors: (1) they distinguish between clinical and nonclinical groups, (2) they are not developmental, and (3) they have a low frequency (less than 10%). The results show large differences in the presence of emotional indicators between this sample and the original Spanish group used to construct the T2F. Only six of the 35 emotional indicators found in the Spanish sample are valid for this representative sample of Yaqui children. Possible causes of this discrepancy are discussed.
References
2014). Gender typicality in children’s art development: A cross-cultural study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2014.946170
(1995). Social scaling in children’s family drawings: A comparative study in three cultures. Child Study Journal, 25, 97–121.
(2010). Draw a Person Test: The sex of the first-drawn figure revisited. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 37, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2009.09.002
(2002). Conductas problemas infantiles: indicadores evolutivos y emocionales en el dibujo de la figura humana
([Child behavior problems: developmental and emotional indicators in drawing the human figure] . Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 36(1–2), 279–298.1999). Emotional indicators in children’s human figure drawings. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 86–91.
(2006). Children’s drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344167
(2010). Índice de marginación por localidad 2010
. ([2010 index of marginalization by locality] . México DF, México: CONAPO. Retrieved from http://www.conapo.gob.mx1989). The human figure drawings of normal children and those with severe learning difficulties. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 333–339.
(2010). A study on the Emotional Indicators in 5–6-year-old girls and boys human figure drawings. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.226
(2000). Street children’s drawings. International Social Work, 43, 107–120.
(1973). Children’s drawings as diagnostic aids. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
(2010). Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas. Programa de revitalización, fortalecimiento y desarrollo de las lenguas indígenas nacionales 2008-2012
. ([National Institute of Indigenous Languages. Program of revitalization, strengthening and development of the national indigenous languages 2008–2012] . PINALI Retrieved from http://site.inali.gob.mx/pdf/02_JUL_PINALI-2008-2012.pdf2007). Psicodiagnóstico clínico del niño
([Child clinical psychodiagnostic] . México DF, México: El Manual Moderno.1990). A construct validation study of the Human Figure Drawing Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(2), 465–466.
(2011). The analysis of children’s drawings: Social, emotional, physical and psychological aspects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2219–2224.
(2014). Un estudio normativo de los ítemes madurativos del test del Dibujo de dos figuras humanas en niños indígenas yaquis
([Developmental items of the Two Human Figures test in a sample of Yaqui indian children. A normative study] . Interdisciplinaria. Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 31(2), 297–322.2015). Un estudio normativo de los ítems evolutivos del Test del Dibujo de la Figura Humana en niños indígenas yaquis
([A normative study of developmental items of the Draw-A-Person in indigenous Yaqui children] . Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 39(1), 77–90.1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
(Hammer E. (Ed.). (1958). The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
(1952). A catalog for the qualitative interpretation of the H-T-P. Beverly Hills, CA: Western Psychological Services.
(1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
(1983). Exploring cultural influences on the human figure drawings of young adolescents. Journal of Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 479–483.
(1968). A comparison of emotional indicators on human figure drawings of children from Mexico and from the United States. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 2, 41–48.
(2008). The usefulness of the Draw a Person: Screening for Problems of Emotional Disturbance (DAP-SPED) in South African Children, Johannesburg, South Africa. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za/…/7053/Kubierske.pdf
(2001). Children’s drawings: A cross-cultural analysis from Japan and the United States. School Psychology International, 22, 53–63.
(1958).
(Projective figure drawings . In E. F. HammerEd., Clinical application of projective drawings (pp. 83–112). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
(2009). Test del Dibujo de Dos Figuras Humanas
([Two Human Figures Drawing Test] . Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.2010). Historia regional de Sonora
([Regional history of Sonora] . Hermosillo, Mexico: Colegio de Bachilleres del Estado de Sonora.2007). Yaquis. México DF, México: Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas.
(1988). DAP: Draw a person: A quantitative scoring system manual. San Antonio, NM: The Psychological Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_4
(1991). DAP: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Austin, TX: ProEd.
(2009). Turkish children’s human figure drawings: Can we borrow norms? Educational Psychology, 29(6), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903210387
(2001). Living and coping with ongoing violence: A cross-national analysis of children’s drawings using structured rating indices. Childhood, 8, 31–55.
(1987). The interpreter’s personality in draw-a-person interpretation: A study of interpersonal style. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 112–122.
(2012). Sistema de Información, Control y Registro Escolar de Sonora (SICRES)
([Information, control and registration school system of Sonora (SICRES)] , Retrieved from http://www.sicres.gob.mx/2007). Human figure drawings as a measure of children’s emotional status: Critical review for practice. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 22, 15–28.
(1994). Los yaquis. Historia de una cultura
([The Yaquis History of a culture] . México DF, México: Universidad Autónoma de México.2011). Validation study of Human Figure Drawing Test in a Colombian school children population. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.42
(2010). Desenho da Figura Humana: Análise da Prevalência de Indicadores para Avaliação Emocional
([Drawing the human figure: Prevalence analysis of indicators for emotional assessment] . Psicologia: Reflexao e Crítica, 24(3), 411–418.