The Implementation and Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program in Finland
Abstract
Bullying is a widespread problem in schools and communities around the world, and nationwide initiatives to prevent and reduce it have begun to emerge in European countries. In Finland, the effects of the national antibullying program, KiVa, have been evaluated first in a randomized controlled trial (2007–2009) and then during nationwide rollout across schools (since 2009). The KiVa program has been found to reduce bullying and victimization, while it increases empathy toward victimized peers and self-efficacy to defend them. Moreover, the program has produced reductions in reinforcement of the bullies’ behavior. Finally, KiVa has been found to increase school liking and school motivation, whereas it has led to significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and negative peer perceptions among children and youth. The uptake of the program by Finnish schools has been remarkable, as 90% of the comprehensive schools are at present implementing KiVa. The paper describes the development of the KiVa program, evaluation of its effects, and its implementation across Finnish schools. Challenges in sustainability and high-level implementation of the program are discussed.
References
1982). Bullies and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture, and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307–313.
(2008). Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 451–461.
(2004). Bullying, physical fighting, and victimization. In , Young people’s health in context: International report from the HBSC 2001/02 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe [WHO Policy Series: Health policy for children and adolescents Issue 4].
(2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.
(2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, doi: 10.4073/csr.2009.6.
(2006). Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 160, 638–644.
(2007). The effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 401–414.
(2005). Kouluhyvinvointityöryhmän muistio.
. ([Report of the school welfare committee; Report 2005:27] Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.2013). Tackling acute cases of bullying in the KiVa antibullying program: A comparison of two approaches. Manuscript in preparation.
(2013). KiVa antibullying curriculum and outcome: Does fidelity matter? Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2011, July). Variation in the implementation process of the KiVa antibullying program in Finland. Poster presented in the Conference on Evidence-Base Prevention of Bullying and Youth Violence, Cambridge, UK.
(2004). Prevention of bullying in German schools: An evaluation of an antibullying approach. In , Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 81–97). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455.
(2012). “It must be me” or “It could be them?” The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims’ adjustment. Social Networks, 34, 379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002
(2008). Long-term consequences of victimization: A follow-up from adolescence to young adulthood. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 387–397.
(2003). Predicting teachers’ and schools’ implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A multilevel study. Prevention & Treatment, 6, Article 21. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.621a.
(2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2011a). Going to Scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 796–805.
(2011b). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.
(2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282.
(1982). Group aggression among school children in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 45–52.
(2003). Enhancing children’s responsibility to take action against bullying: Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 1–14.
(2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 26–42.
(2005). Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76, 435–450.
(2001). Knowledge and skills for life. First results from the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/document/46/0,3343,en_32252351_32236159_33688686_1_1_1_1,00.html.
. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved from www.pisa.oecd.org/document/55/0,3343,en_32252351_32236173_33917303_1_1_1_1,00.html.
. (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1: Analysis. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/document/2/0,3343,en_32252351_32236191_39718850_1_1_1_1,00.html.
. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive summary. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_35845621_46567613_1_1_1_1,00.html#PISA_2009_results.
. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Retrieved from dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.
. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In , The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: HEMIL Center.
(2005). New positive results with the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in 37 Oslo schools. Unpublished report. HEMIL Center, Bergen, Norway.
(1991). Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In , Problems and methods in longitudinal research: Stability and change (pp. 107–132). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). Anti-bullying computer game as part of the KiVa program: Students’ perceptions of the game. In , The impact of technology on relationships in educational settings: International Perspectives (pp. 158–168). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2010). What does it take to defend the victimized peer? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 143–163.
(2012). Standing up for a victim, siding with the bully, or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21, 722–741.
(2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 211–223.
(2009). Antibullying programs in schools: How effective are evaluation practices?. Prevention Science, 10, 248–259.
(2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.
(2012). KiVa Anti-Bullying Program: Implications for School Adjustment. In , Peer relationships and adjustment at school. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
(2011). Implementation fidelity of the KiVa Antibullying Program during randomized controlled trial and broad dissemination. August Presentation at the 15th European Conference of Developmental Psychology, Bergen Norway.
(2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 465–487.
(2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In , Handbook of bullying in schools. An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 405–411.
(1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
(2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between defending, reinforcing, and the frequency of bullying in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676.
(2004). Life circumstances of young people. School. In , Young people’s health in context. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2001/2002 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization.
(2004). The effectiveness of whole- school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.
(1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2007). What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The Finnish “From a boy to a man” Study. Pediatrics, 120, 397–404.
(2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of antibullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 195–210.
(2010). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. doi: 10. 1007/s11292-010-9109-1
(2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice?. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 50–70.
(2012). Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 289–300. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1
(2007). A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 78–88.
(