Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Evaluation Method of Gastric Mucoadhesive Property in Vitro and the Mucoadhesive Mechanism of Tetracycline-Sucralfate Acidic Complex for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The gastric mucoadhesive property of tetracycline-sucralfate acidic complex (CO) was evaluated by using a novel method in vitro to compare with the in vivo test. The mucoadhesive mechanism of the acidic complex was also studied.

Methods. The gastric mucosa removed from a rat was placed covering the end of a plunger and secured in a disposable syringe. The acidic test medium was gradually infused in and then flowed out. Two different kinds of CO, tetracycline, or a physical mixture (PM) were introduced into the device to compare their mucoadhesive properties. The tetracycline content in the residue on the mucosa was measured. The results were compared with those of the in vivo test. The acidic response of CO and the protein binding capacity of a sucrose octa-sulfate group (SOS) in sucralfate or CO were evaluated.

Results. The mucoadhesive properties of CO were clearly superior to those of PM. The remaining amounts of tetracycline in each test sample, determined by the in vitro test, were in agreement with those of the in vivo test. The excellent mucoadhesive property of CO appeared to be caused by the rapid response to the acid and resulting mucoadhesive gel formation. Furthermore, the binding capacity of SOS to the protein was clearly greater than that of PM. The excessive acid treatment during the preparation of CO tended to decrease the mucoadhesive property.

Conclusions. CO appeared to be potentially useful for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori because of the direct delivery of tetracycline to the gastric mucosa for an extended period of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Lind, S. V. van Zanten, P. Unge, R. Spiller, E. Bayerdorffer, C. Morain, K. D. Bardhan, M. Bradette, N. Chiba, M. Wrangstadh, C. Cederberg, and J. P. Idstrom. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori using one-week triple therapy combining Omeprazole with two antimicrobials: The mach I study. Helicobacter 1:138-144 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. van Zwet, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, J. C. Thijs, E. J. van der Wouden, M. M. Gerrits, and J. G. Kusters. Stable amoxicilline resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Lancet 352:1595(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Vakil, B. Hahn, and D. McSorley. Clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in the United States. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 93:1432-1435 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. L. Thomsen, J. B. Gavin, and C. Tasman-Jones. Relation of Helicobacter pylori to the human gastric mucosa in chronic gastritis of the antrum. Gut 31:1230-1236 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Blanco-Fuente, S. Anguiano-Igea, F. J. Otero-Espinar, and J. Blanco-Mendez. In-vitro bioadhesion of carbopol hydrogels. Int J. Pharm. 142:169-174 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Tamburic and D. Q. M. Craig. An investigation into the rheological, dielectric and mucoadhesive properties of poly (acrylic acid) gel systems. J. Control. Rel. 37:59-68 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Pritchard, A. B. Lansley, G. P. Martin, M. Helliwell, C. Marriott, and L. M. Benedetti. Evaluation of the bioadhesive properties of hyaluronan derivatives: detachment weight and mucociliary transport rate studies. Int. J. Pharm. 129:137-145 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Prudat-Christiaens, P. Arnaud, P. Allain, and J. C. Chaumeil. Aminophylline bioadhesive tablets attempted by wet granulation. Int. J. Pharm. 141:109-116 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. F. Saettone, P. Chetoni, M. T. Torracca, S. Burgalassi, and B. Giannaccini. Evaluation of muco-adhesive properties and in vivo activity of ophthalmic vehicles based on hyaluronic acid. Int. J. Pharm. 51:203-212 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. S. Chng, H. Park, P. Kelly, and J. R. Robinson. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. J. Pharm. Sci. 74:399-405 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Katayama, T. Nishimura, S. Ochi, Y. Tsuruta, Y. Yamazaki, K. Shibata, and H. Yoshitomi. Sustained release liquid preparation using sodium alginate for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 22:55-60 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Tasman-Jones, G. Morrison, L. Thomsen, and M. Vanderwee. Sucralfate interactions with gastric mucus. Am. J. Med. 86:5-9 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Nakamura, R. Ohta, Y. Machida, and T. Nagai. In vitro and in vivo nasal mucoadhesion of some water-soluble polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 134:173-181 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Hejazi and M. Amiji. Stomach-specific anti-H. pylori therapy. I: preparation and characterization of tetracycline-loaded chitosan microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 235:87-94 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. H. Lee and Y. W. Chien. Development and evaluation of a mucoadhesive drug delivery system for dual-controlled delivery of Nonoxynol-9. J. Control. Rel. 39:93-103 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Nagashima, Y. Hinohara, T. Hirano, and H. Kamiyama. Selective binding of sucralfate to ulcer lesion: II. Experiments in rats with gastric ulcer receiving 14C-sucralfate or potassium 14C-sucrose sulfate. Arzneim-Forsh./Drug Res. 30:84-88 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Nagashima. Mechanism of action of sucralfate. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 3:117-127 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Nakazawa, R. Nagashima, and M. Samloff. Selective binding of sucralfate to gastric ulcer in man. Dig. Dis. Sci. 26:297-300 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Romano, M. Razandi, and K. J. Ivey. Effect of sucralfate and its components on taurocholate-induced damage to rat gastric mucosal cell in tissue culture. Dig. Dis. Sci. 35:467-476 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. P. Morris, C. M. Keenan, W. K. Macnaughton, J. L. Wallace, and T. E. Williamson. Protection of rat gastric mucosa by sucralfate. Am. J. Med. 86:10-16 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. A. Yokel, K. M. Dickey, and A. H. Goldberg. Selective adherence of a sucralfate-tetracycline complex to gastric ulcers: implications for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 16:475-479 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Oka, H. Matsumoto, K. Uno, K. Harada, S. Kadowaki, and M. Suzuki. Improvement of chemical analysis of antibiotics. VIII. J. Chromatogr. 325:265-274 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Oka, K. Uno, K. Harada, and M. Suzuki. Improvement of chemical analysis of antibiotics. II. Yakugaku-Zasshi. 103:531-537 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Terada, M. Asanoma, and Y. Sakabe. Studies on residual antibacterials in foods. I. Eisei-Kagaku 30:138-143 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Hoshino, M. Horie, N. Nose, and H. Iwasaki. Determination of tetracyclines and macrolide residues in meats by high performance liquid chromatography. Shokuhin-Eiseigaku-Zasshi 25:430-435 (984).

  26. M. J. Tobyn, J. R. Johnson, and P. W. Dettman. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion I: test condition and instrumental parameters. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 41:235-241 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. R. Jimenez-Castellanos, H. Zia, and C. T. Rhodes. Assessment of an in vitro method for measuring the bioadhesiveness of tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 89:223(1993).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Charrueau, P. Aruaud, J. Durieux, P. Allain, and J. C. Chaumeil. Oropharyngeal decontamination, bioadhesive power mixture formation: choice of the bioadhesive material. J. Control. Rel. 26:49-57 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Rillosi and G. Buckton. Modelling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained by the lewis and-lewis base approach. Int. J. Pharm. 117:75-84 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. A. Attama, M. U. Adikwu, and N. D. Okoli. Studies on bioadhesive granules I: granules formation with Prosopis africana (prosopis) gum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 48:734-737 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. D. Smart, I. W. Kellaway, and H. E. C. Worthington. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 36:295-299 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Nagashima and N. Yoshida. Sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate: I. Behaviors in gastroduodenal pH. Arzneim.-Forsh./Drug Res. 29:1668-1676 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Nagashima, N. Yoshida, and N. Terao. Sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate: II. Inhibition of peptic hydrolysisas it from sucrose sulfate interaction with protein substrate, serum albumins. Arzneim.-Forsh./Drug Res. 30:73-76 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoichi Higo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higo, S., Ori, K., Takeuchi, H. et al. A Novel Evaluation Method of Gastric Mucoadhesive Property in Vitro and the Mucoadhesive Mechanism of Tetracycline-Sucralfate Acidic Complex for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori . Pharm Res 21, 413–419 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000019293.57927.7f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000019293.57927.7f

Navigation