Skip to main content
Log in

The New Equal Treatment Directive: Plus Ça Change ...

  • Legislative Note
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Directive 2002/73 enacted by the Council and Parliament of the European Union introduces substantial and procedural amendments to the European Community's `old' Equal Treatment Directive 76/207, providing, in particular, clarification of the definitions of concepts such as direct and indirect discrimination and (sexual) harassment. Yet, while the European Commission has praised the progressive nature of the new European legislation, a critical assessment of its provisions reveals some serious shortcomings and a host of missed opportunities. Although the new Directive generally reflects the spirit of the case law of the E.C.J., it does so without any originality or pro-activism meaning that the European legislature has once again left the initiative of pursuing sex equality in the E.U. to the Court.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berthou, K., “'Actions positives', l'arrêt Badeck, CJCE 28 mars 2000”, Droit Social 9-10 (2001), 879–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caracciolo di Torella, E. & Masselot, A., “The ECJ Case Law on Issues Related to Pregnancy,Maternity and the Organisation of Family Life: an Attempt at Classification”, European Law Review 26 (2001), 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S., Discrimination Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koukoulis-Spiliotopoulos, S., From Formal to Substantive Gender Equality: The Proposed Amendment of Directive 76/207-Comments and Suggestions (Brussels: Bruylant, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacqmain, J., “Egalité entre femmes et hommes dans les conditions de travail: Amendments à la directive européenne 76/207”, Chronique de Droit Social 6 (2003), 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • social/equ_opp/rights_en.html}).

  • Rubinstein, M., The Dignity of Women at Work: A Report on the Problem of Sexual Harassment in the Member States of the European Community (Luxembourg: European Communities, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieck, D., “A New Framework on Equal Treatment of Persons in EC Law? Directives 2000/43/EC, 2000/78/EC and 2002/??/EC Changing Directive 76/207/EEC in context”, European Law Journal 8 (2002), 290–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, C., “Positive Action Under the Revised Second Equal Treatment Directive”, in L'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et la vie professionnelle-le point sur les développements actuels en Europe, eds. Association Française des Femmes Juristes and European Women Lawyers Association (Paris: Dalloz 2003), 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintemute, R., “When is Pregnancy Discrimination Indirect Discrimination?”, Industrial Law Journal 27 (1998), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masselot, A. The New Equal Treatment Directive: Plus Ça Change .... Feminist Legal Studies 12, 93–104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000026117.71863.56

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000026117.71863.56

Navigation