Skip to main content
Log in

Myocardial adaptation in different endurance sports: an echocardiographic study

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Of this study was to investigate three groups of highly trained competitive endurance athletes consisting of marathon runners, triathletes and cyclists for differences in left ventricular adaptation. Methods: 25 marathon athletes, 21 triathlon athletes and 38 cyclists underwent a standard echocardiographic and Doppler study. Results: The left ventricular internal diameter in diastole divided by body surface area was significantly larger in cyclists than in marathon runners (31.6 ± 3.0 vs. 30.0 ± 2.0 mm/m2, p < 0.05) but did not differ of that of triathletes. Left ventricular mass was significantly different between marathon runners and triathletes (253.6 ± 63.7 vs. 322.0 ± 62.1 g, p < 0.005) and between marathon runners and cyclists (253.6 ± 63.7 vs. 314.2 ± 79.2 g, p < 0.005). Systolic wall stress was significantly different between the marathon runners and the triathletes (88.4 ± 11.7 vs. 78.9 ± 11.0 g/cm2 p < 0.05). Only a minority of the endurance athletes showed concentric remodeling (7%), whereas a majority showed eccentric remodeling (65%) of the left ventricle. The prevalence of eccentric remodeling was more apparent in cyclists. There were some specific differences in left ventricular diastolic function between the three different endurance sports, but no left ventricular diastolic dysfunction could be detected. Conclusion: There is a sport-specific left ventricular adaptation in endurance athletes. The triathlon heart and the heart of a cyclist differ significantly from a marathon heart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schaier J, Stein P, Keteyian S, Fedel F, Ehrman J, Alam M. Left ventricular response to submaximal exercise in endurance trained athletes and sedentary adults. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 930–933.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro L. Morphologic consequences off systematic training. In: Cardiology Clinics Philadelphia. Saunders vol. 10, 1992; 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maron BJ, Structural features of the athlete heart as defined by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levine B, Lane L, Buckey J, Friedman D, Blomqvist G. Left ventricular pressure volume and Frank-Starling relations in endurance athletes. Circulation 1991; 84: 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colan S, Sanders S, Borow K. Physiologic hypertrophy: effects on left ventricular mechanics in athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palatini P, Mos L, Di Marco A, et al. Intra-arterial blood pressure recording during sports activities. J Hypertens 1987; 5: 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell JH. Classification of sports. J Am Cardiol 1994; 24: 864–866.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fagard R, Aubert A, Staesen J, Van den Eynde E, Van Hees L, Amery A. Cardiac structure and function in cyclists and runners comparative echocardiographic study. Br Heart J 1984; 52: 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lauer M, Levy D, Keaven M, Anderson, Plehn J. Is there a relationship between exercise systolic blood pressure response and left ventricular mass? Ann Int Med 1992; 16: 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgenroth J, Maron B, Henry W. Comparative left ventricular dimensions in trained athletes. Ann Intern Med 1975; 82: 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nishimura T, Yoshihisa Y, Chiuchi K. Echocardiographic evaluation of long-term effects on left ventricular hypertrophy and function in professional bicyclists. Circulation 1980; 61: 832–840.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. Measurement of surface area in man. Arch Int Med 1915; 15: 868–881.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni G, et al. Adverse prognostic significance on concentric remodelling of the left ventricle in hypertensive subjects with normal left ventricular mass. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 871–878.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krumholz HM, Larson M, Levy D. Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in Framinham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 879–884.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Douglas PS, Reichek N, Hackney K, Ioli A, Sutton MG. Contribution of after load, hypertrophy and geometry to left ventricular ejection fraction in aortic valve stenosis, pure aortic regurgitation and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 1398–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reichek N, Wilson J, St John Sutton, Plappert T, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld S. Noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress; validation of the method and initial application. Circulation 1982; 65: 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Devereux RB, Alonso D, Lutas E, Gottlieb G, Campo E, Sachs I. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450–458.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Circulation 1977; 55: 613–618.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography 5th ed Lea & Febinger, 1994; 676–677.

  20. Colan S. Mechanics of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete's heart. In: Crawford M editor. Cardiology Clinics Saunders W.B, 1997; 355–372.

  21. Fagard R, Van den Broeke C, Vanhees L, et al. Non-invasive assessment of systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in female runners. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 1305.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fagard R, Van den Broeke C, Amery A. Left ventricular dynamics during exercise in elite marathon runners. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 112.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Douglas P, O'Toole M, Katz S, Ginsburg G, Douglas W, Laird R. Left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1384–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pluim B, Zwinderman A, van der Laarse A, van der Wall E. The athlete's heart a meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function. Circulation 1999; 100: 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Snoeckx L, Abeling H, Lambrechts J, Schmitz J, Verstappen F, Reneman R. Cardiac dimensions in athletes in relation to variation in their training programs. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983; 52: 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colan S, Sanders S, MacPhierson D, Borow K. Left ventricular diastolic function in elite athletes with physiologic cardiac hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 545–549.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Galanti G, Comeglio M, Vinci M, Capelli B, Vono M, Bamoshmoosh M. Echocardiographic Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in athletes hypertrophic hearts. Angiol J Vasc Diseases 1993; 44: 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harrison M, Clifton GD, Penell AT, Demaria AN. Effect of heart rate on left ventricular diastolic transmitral flow velocity patterns assessed by Doppler echocardiography in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 622–627.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Douglas P, O'Toole M, Douglas W, Hiller B, Reichek N. Left ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in ultra endurance athletes. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 805–809.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoogsteen, J., Hoogeveen, A., Schaffers, H. et al. Myocardial adaptation in different endurance sports: an echocardiographic study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20, 19–26 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CAIM.0000013160.79903.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CAIM.0000013160.79903.19

Navigation