Skip to main content
Log in

CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Development of Blastocyst-Stage Embryos After Round Spermatid Injection in Patients with Complete Spermiogenesis Failure

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate the progression of embryos derived from round spermatid injection to the blastocyst stage and compare the results with those obtained by the use of testicular or epididymal spermatozoa.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients with azoospermia enrolled in this study. In 29 patients with obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia, spermatozoa were recovered from epididymis or testis. In the remaining nine cases with nonobstructive azoospermia, only round spermatids were found in seven, whereas in two of the patients, there were no elongated or round spermatids. Six of these cases underwent round spermatid injection.

Results: Twenty-one of 29 patients with injection of spermatozoa underwent embryo transfer on day 3, and 10 pregnancies (47.6%) were obtained. In eight cycles, embryos were further cultured for delayed transfer. In six cases undergoing round spermatid injection, no transfer was performed on day 3 and extended culture with delayed embryo transfer was applied. The mean number of fertilized oocytes and mean number of embryos on day 3 and also the fertilization rate and mean number of good-quality embryos on day 3, mainly grade 1 or 2, were statistically significantly higher in the spermatozoa group than the round spermatid injection group. Compared to the spermatozoa group, the number of arrested embryos was significantly higher and the number of blastocyst-stage embryos and number of good-quality blastocysts were significantly lower in the spermatid injection group. No blastocysts developed in two spermatid cycles and embryo transfer was not possible, and in the remaining four cycles, after at least one blastocyst transfer, no pregnancies were achieved. However, in eight cycles with extended culture in the spermatozoa group, embryo transfers were achieved in all and three pregnancies, for a pregnancy rate of 37.5%, were obtained after blastocyst transfer.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results showed that round spermatid injection was associated with a significantly lower fertilization and embryo development rate and a significantly higher developmental arrest rate compared with the injection of spermatozoa. Extended culture and delayed embryo transfer did not improve the clinical outcome after round spermatid injection, and these results suggested a developmental failure in embryos preventing successful implantation after round spermatid injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Schoysman R, Wanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal L, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, van Roosendaal E, Schoysman D: Pregnancy after fertilization with human testicular sperm. Lancet 1993;342: 1237

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Silber S: Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1457-1460

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards RG, Tarin JJ, Dean N, Hirsch A, Tan SL: Are spermatid injections into human oocytes now mandatory? Hum Reprod 1994;9:2217-2219

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wanderzwalmen P, Lejeune B, Nijs M, Segal-Bertin G, Vandammer B, Schoysman R: Fertilization of an oocyte microinseminated with a spermatid in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 1995;8:502-503

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Testart J: Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 525

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tesarik J, Mendoza C: Spermatid injection into human oocytes. I. Laboratory techniques and special features of zygote development. Hum Reprod 1996;11:772-779

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tesarik J, Rolet F, Brami C, Sedban E, Thorel J, Tihi C, Thebault A: Spermatid injection into human oocytes. II.Clinical application in the treatment of infertility due to nonobstructive azoospremia. Hum Reprod 1996;11:780-783

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fishel S, Aslam I, Tesarik J: Spermatid conception:Astage too early, or a time too soon? Hum Reprod 1995;11:1371-1375

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fishel S, Green S, Hunter A, Lisi F, Rinaldo L, Lisi R, McDemott H: Human fertilization with round and elongated spermatids. Hum Reprod 1997;12:336-340

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amer M, Soliman E, el-Sadek M, Mendoza C, Tesarik J: Is complete spermiogenesis failure a good indication for spermatid conception? Lancet 1997;350:116

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antinori S, Versaci C, Dani G, Antinori M, Pazza D, Selman HA: Fertilization with human testicular spermatids: four successful pregnancies. Human Reprod 1997;12:286-291

    Google Scholar 

  12. Antinori S, Versaci C, Dani G, Antinori M, Selman HA: Succesful fertilization and pregnancy after injection of frozenthawed round spermatids into human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1997;12:554-556

    Google Scholar 

  13. Araki Y, Motayama M, Yoshida A, Kim SY, Sung H, Araki S: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with late spermatids: a succesful procedure in achieving childbirth for couples in which the male partner suffers from azoospermia due to deficient spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril 1992;67:559-561

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barak Y, Kogosowski A, Goldman S, Soffer Y, Gonen Y, Tesarik J: Pregnancy and birth after transfer of embryos that developed from single-nucleated zygotes obtained by injection of round spermatids into oocytes. Fertil Steril 1998;70:67-70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barros A, Bernabeu R, Takahashi K, et al.: Intracytoplasmic injection of ejaculate and testicle spermatids. Report on 35 cycles. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(abstr book 1):154-155

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barros A, Takahashi K, Bernabeu R, et al.: Spermatid intracytoplasmic injection: Report on 56 cycles.Fertil Steril 1998;Abstr suppl:S441

  17. Bernabeu R, Cremades N, Takahashi K, Sousa M: Succesful pregnancy after spermatid injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1898-1900

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sofitikis N, Yamamoto Y, Miyagawa I, Mekros G, Mio Y, Toda Y, Antypas S, et al.: Ooplasmic injection of elongating spermatids for the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia.Hum Reprod 1998;13:709-714

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kahraman S, Sözen E, Vicdan K, Polat G, Özgün OD, Evrenkaya T, Özgür S, Dirican K, Özbiçer T, Alaybeyoğlu L, Biberoğlu K: Fertility after intracytoplasmic round and elongated spermatid injection in males with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:(5)(Suppl):141S

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wanderzwalmen P, Zech H, Birkenfdeld A: Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatids retrieved from testicular tissue: Influence of testicular pathology, type of selected spermatids and oocyte activation. Hum Reprod 1997;6:1203-1213

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prapas Y, Chatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Prapas N, Lejeune B, Vlassis G, Schoysman R: Spermatid injection. Reconsidering spermatid injection. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2186-2188

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghazzawi IM, Alhassani S, Taher M, Sousa S: Reproductive capacity of round spermatids compared with spermatozoa in population of azoospermic men. Hum Reprod 1999;14:736-740

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sousa M, Barros A, Takahashi K, Olşveira C, Silva J, Tesarik J: Clinical efficacy of spermatid conception: Analysis using a new spermatid classification scheme. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1279-1286

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gardner DK, Lane M: Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: A feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update 1997;3:367-382

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scholtes MCW, Zeilmaker HG: Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age. Fertil Steril 1998;69:78-83

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gardner KD, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB: Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 1998;69:84-88

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones GM, Trounson AO, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C: Evolution of a culture protocol for successful blastocyst development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998;13:169-177

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ogura A, Yanagimachi R: Round spermatid nuclei injected into hamster oocytes form pronuclei and participate syngany. Biol Reprod 1993;48:219-225

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ogura A, Matsuda J, Yanagimachi R: Birth of normal young after electrofusion of mouse oocytes with round spermatids. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:7460-7462

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Mouzon J, Lancaster P: World Collaborative Report on IVF (preliminary data for 1995). J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:251S-265S

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner DK: Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support. Cell Biol Int 1994;18:1163-1179

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA: Enhanced rate of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: Amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod 1994;50:390-400

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bavister BD: Culture of preimplantation embryos: Facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:91-148

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fong CY, Bongso A, Ng SC, Anandakumar G, Trounson A, Ratnam S: Ongoing normal pregnancy after transfer of zonafree blastocysts: Implications for embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1997;12:557-560

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner KD, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB: Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers Fertil Steril 1998;69:84-88

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yamamoto Y, Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I: Ooplasmic injections of rabbit round spermatid nuclei or intact round spermatids from fresh, cryopreserved and cryostored samples. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1506-1515

    Google Scholar 

  37. Balaban B, Urman B, Işiklar A, Alataş C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, Nuhoğlu A: Progression to the blastocyst stage of embryos derived from testicular round spermatids. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1377-1382

    Google Scholar 

  38. Edwards RG, Brody SA: Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jany L, Menezo Y: Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev 1994;38:104-110

    Google Scholar 

  40. Aslam I, Fishel S: Short-term in-vitro culture and cryopreservation of spermatogenetic cells used for human in vitro conception Hum Reprod 1998;13:634-638

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tesarik J, Bahçeci M, Özcan C, Greco E, Mendoza C: Restoration of fertility by in vitro spermatogenesis. Lancet 1999;353:555-556

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cremades N, Bernabeu R, Barros A, Sousa M: In vitro maturation of round spermatids using co-culture onVero cells. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1287-1293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vicdan, K., Isik, A.Z. & Delilbaşi, L. CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Development of Blastocyst-Stage Embryos After Round Spermatid Injection in Patients with Complete Spermiogenesis Failure. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 78–86 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026578507736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026578507736

Navigation