Abstract
Objectives: This study describes the use of a Medicaid managed care list to prospectively recruit into a research project pregnant women receiving care from a variety of providers. Method: A list of women enrolled in Medicaid managed care was used to recruit pregnant African-American and Latina women into a study of prenatal care satisfaction. Due to privacy concerns, the researchers were not able to directly access names from the list. Instead, a managed care contract agency sent recruitment letters to 1009 pregnant African-American and Latina Medicaid recipients. Response rates by ethnicity and several other key variables are calculated. The biases associated with this method of recruiting pregnant women from a variety of providers are discussed. Results: Thirty-five percent of the women contacted returned consent forms and agreed to have researchers approach them; the response rate for African-American women was 43% and for Latinas was 29% (p < 0.0001). Respondents were younger and later in their pregnancies than nonrespondents, but did not differ from them by zip code of residence. The women recruited into the study obtained prenatal care from a diverse group of providers. Conclusions: While the use of a prospectively generated list of pregnant Medicaid recipients to recruit low-income pregnant women into a research study may be associated with some selection bias, the potential cost savings, decreased effort, and diminished recall bias may make their use a feasible sampling alternative, particularly when the researcher desires to recruit women seeking care from a variety of provider arrangements.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Handler A, Rosenberg D, Raube K., Kelley M. Health care characteristics associated with women's satisfaction with prenatal care. Medical Care 1998; in press.
Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
Harris L, Weinberger M, Tierney W. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences: A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Medical Care 1997;35(1):70–6.
Groves RM Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1989.
McGraw SA, McKinlay JB, Crawford SA, Costa LA, Cohen DL Health survey methods with minority populations: Some lessons from recent experience. In Becker, DM, Hill, DR, Jackson, JS, Levine, DM, Stillman, FA, Weiss, SM, editors. Health behavior research in minority populations, access, design and implementation. NIH Publication No. 92-2965. Bethesda, MA: National Institutes of Health, 1992:149–67.
Groves RM, Couper MP. (1993). Unit nonresponse in demographic surveys. In Anderson-Brown, M, editor. Proceedings of the 1990 Annual Research Conference. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, 1993:593–619.
Hewson D, Bennett A. Childbirth research data: Medical records or women's reports? Am J Epidemiol 1987;125(3):484–91.
Werler M, Pober B, Nelson K, Holmes L. Reporting accuracy among mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129(2):415–21.
Mackenzie S, Lippman A. An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129(1): 65–75.
Bryant H, Visser N, Love E. Records, recall loss and recall bias in pregnancy: A comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women. A J Public Health 1989;79:78–80.
Khoury M, James L, Erickson D. On the use of affected controls to address recall bias in case-control studies of birth defects. Teratology 1994;49:273–81.
Kaye N, Operations Manager. Personal communication. Portland, ME. Medicaid Managed Care Resource Center, National Academy for State Health Policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handler, A., Rosenberg, D., Johnson, T. et al. Prospective Recruitment of Women Receiving Prenatal Care from Diverse Provider Arrangements: A Potential Strategy. Matern Child Health J 1, 173–177 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026273429603
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026273429603