Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Root distribution of a Mediterranean shrubland in Portugal

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of roots of an Erica (Erica scoparia and Erica lusitanica) dominated Mediterranean maquis was studied using three different approaches: root counts on trench walls (down to 120 cm), estimation of the maximum rooting depth using an allometric relationship and estimation of fine root biomass and fine root length using soil cores (down to 100 cm). Roots were classified according to diameter (fine, ≤1.0 mm; small, 1.1–5.0 mm; medium, 5.1–10.0 mm; coarse, >10.0 mm) and species (Erica sp., Pteridium aquilinum, Rubus ulmifolius and Ulex jussiaei). The depth corresponding to 50% of all roots (D 50) was determined by fitting a new model to the cumulative root distribution. Fine roots represented 96% of root counts. Root counts of Erica represented 59%, Ulex 34%, Rubus 6% and Pteridium 1%. Overall root counts showed a D 50 of 26 cm. D 50 was higher for Ulex (40 cm) and Erica (22 cm), than for Pteridium (9 cm) and Rubus (3 cm). D 50 for fine roots was 27 cm, for small roots 11 cm, for medium roots 6 cm and for coarse roots 4 cm. The estimated average maximum rooting depth of the 28 deepest Erica roots was 222 cm. The deepest Erica root was estimated to reach 329 cm. A total of 82% of roots growing deeper than 125 cm were not reaching more than 175 cm. The overall fine root length density ranged from 4.6 cm/cm3 at 10 cm to 0.8 cm/cm3 at 80 cm. The overall fine root biomass ranged from 7.7 mg/cm3 at 10 cm to 0.6 mg/cm3 at 40 cm. D 50 for root biomass was 12 cm and D 50 for root length was 14 cm. Fine root biomass was estimated as 1.6 kg/m2 and the respective root length as 18.7 km/m2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson D 1978 The use of soil resources in high density planting systems. Acta Hortic. 65, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D 2000 Root characteristics: Why and what to measure. In Root Methods. A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 1–32. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W 1979 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1986 Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. In On the Economy of Plant Life and Function. Ed. T J Givnish. pp. 251–273. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M M and Virginia R A 1989 Root systems. In Physiological Plant Ecology. Field Methods and Instrumentation. Eds. R W Pearcy, J R Ehleringer, H A Mooney and P Rundel. pp. 367–398. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell J and Rodà F 1991 Root biomass of Quercus ilex in a montane Mediterranean forest. Can J For Res. 21, 1771–1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell J and Zedler P H 1995 Underground structures of woody plants in Mediterranean Ecosystems of Australia, California and Chile. In Ecology and Biogeography of Mediterranean Ecosystems in Chile, California and Australia. Eds. M T Arroyo, P H Zedler and M D Fox. pp. 177–210. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J R, Mooney H A, Sala O E and Schulze E-D 1996 Maximum root depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108, 583–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañellas I and Ayanz A 2000 Biomasss of root and shoot systems of Quercus coccifera shrublands in Eastern Spain. Ann. For. Sci. 57, 803–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper B C and Jackson R B 1997 Plant competition underground. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 545–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts M P 1983 Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djema A 1995 Cuantification de la Biomassa e Mineralomassa Subterranea de un Bosque de Quercus Ilex. MSc. Thesis. Instituto Agronomico Mediterraneo de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. 71 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage M and Gruber F 1998 Architecture of the skeletal root system of 40-year-old Picea abies on strongly acidified soils in the Harz Mountains (Germany). Can. J. For. Res. 28, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H 1996 Characteristics and functions of root systems. In Plant roots. The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp. 1–20. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H and Ennos A R 1989 Architectural constraints to root system function. Ed. D Robinson. Asp. Appl. Biol. 22, 15–22.

  • Gale M R and Grigal D F 1987 Vertical root distribution of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 829–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwitz A and Page E R 1974 An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 773–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann A and Kummerow J 1978 Root studies in the Chilean matorral. Oecologia 32, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, Mooney H A, Sala O E and Shulze E D 1996 A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B, Mooney H A and Schulze E-D 1997 A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7363–7366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy E and Jackson R 2000 The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B and Rickman R W1990 Modelling crop root growth and function. Adv. Agron. 44, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J 1981 Structure of roots and root systems. In Mediterranean-Type Shrublands. Eds. F di Castri, D W Goodall and R L Specht. pp. 269–288. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J, Krause D and Jow W1977 Root systems of chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 29, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J, Kummerow M and Trabaud L 1990 Root biomass, root distribution and the fine-root growth dynamics of Quercus coccifera L. in the garrigue of Southern France.Vegetatio 87, 37– 44.

  • Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H and Büttner V 2000 Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 126, 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • López B, Sabaté S and Gracia C 2001 Vertical distribution of fine root dnsity, length density, area index and mean diameter in a Quercus ilex forest. Tree Physiol. 21, 555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh B 1971 Measurements of length in random arrangements of lines (Short communication). J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez F and Rodriguez J M 1988 Distribución vertical de las raices del matorral de Doñana. Lagascalia 15, 549–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, F, Merino O, Martín A, García Martín D and Merino J 1998 Below ground structure and production in a Mediterranean sand dune shrub community. Plant Soil 201, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay H M 1988 The influence of pine on the form of Sitka spruce fine roots. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 1263–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P C and Ng E 1977 Root-shoot biomass ratios in shrubs in southern California and central Chile. Madroño 24, 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith J L, Huda A K S and Midya D 1989 RESCAP: a resource capture model for sorghum and pearl millet. In Modelling the Growth and Development of Sorghum and Pearl Millet. Eds. S M Virmani, H L Tandon and S Alagarswamy. ICRISAT Res Bull 12, 30–34.

  • Nepstad D C, Carvalho C R, Davidson E A, Jipp P H, Lefebvre P A, Negreiros G H, Silva E D da, Stone T A, Trumbore S E and Vieira S 1994 The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 372, 666–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagés L, Asseng S, Pellerin S and Diggle A 2000 Modelling root system growth and architecture. In Root Methods. A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 113–146. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakeman R J and Marrs R H 1994 The effects of control on the biomass, carbohydrate, content and bud reserves of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum L. Kuhn), and an evaluation of a bracken growth model. Ann. Appl. Biol. 124, 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk H J and Jackson R B 2002a The global biogeography of roots. Ecol. Monog. 72, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk H J and Jackson R B 2002b Rooting depths, lateral root spreads, and belowground/aboveground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J. Ecol. 90, 480–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman J J and Goedewaagen M A 1971 Methods for the examination of root systems and roots. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Nederlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani and Dudley 1996 Modelling water uptake by roots under water and salt stress: Soil-based and crop response root sink terms. In Plant roots. The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp. 635–641. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva J S, Rego F C and Mazzoleni S 2002 Fire effects on soil water dynamics in a Mediterranean shrubland. In Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research. Coimbra, Portugal.

  • Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 1995 Biometry. W D Freeman and Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 99, 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Brouwer F, Meijboom M, Oliveira M do R and Bengough A G 2000 Trench profile techniques and core break methods. In Root Methods. A Handbook. Eds. A L Smit, A G Bengough, C Engels, M van Noordwijk, S Pellerin and S C van de Geijn. pp. 211–234. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • VandeWalle I, Willems S, Lemeur R 1998 Root length and distribution in the mineral soil of a mixed deciduous forest (experimental forest aelmoeseneie). Silva Gand. 63, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenmüller J, Santos W, Denich M and Vlek P L 1998 Modelling of fine root distribution under secondary vegetation in NE Amazonia – a qualitative and quantitative assessment. In Proceedings of the Third SHIFT-Workshop. Manaus, Brazil. pp 185–189.

  • Zeng X 2001 Global vegetation root distribution for land modelling. J. Hydromet. 2, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Dai Y, Dickinson R E and Shaikh M 1998 The role of root distribution for climate simulation over land. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4533–4536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemer R R 1981 Roots and stability of forested slopes. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Erosion and Sediment Transport in Pacific Rim Wetlands. Christchurch, New Zealand. pp. 343–361.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra, 3040-316, Coimbra, Portugal

    Joaquim S. Silva

  2. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisboa, Portugal

    Francisco C. Rego

Authors
  1. Joaquim S. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco C. Rego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquim S. Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, J.S., Rego, F.C. Root distribution of a Mediterranean shrubland in Portugal. Plant and Soil 255, 529–540 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026029031005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026029031005

Search

Navigation