Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

National and Regional Differences in Preparation for Future Care Needs: A Comparison of the United States and Germany

  • Published:
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Planning for future care needs is likely to be influenced by both policy and culture. We compared attitudes regarding the usefulness of planning ahead for future care needs, processes of preparation for these needs (becoming aware of the risk of future care needs, gathering information about available options, deciding on preferences, concrete planning), and outcomes of preparation (e.g., knowledge about services) in 294 East German, 288 West German, and 590 American seniors. American respondents had higher preparation scores. Compared to the size of national differences, differences between East and West German seniors were generally smaller. East Germans made fewer decisions on preferences and engaged in less concrete planning. Most of the national and regional differences in preparation for future care needs were reduced or eliminated by controlling for differences in the perceived usefulness of planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, M. (1996). The effects of disadvantage in the residential choices of elderly Hispanic women in the United States. Family Perspective 30: 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alternstetter, C. (1999). From solidarity to market competition? Values, structures, and strategy in German health policy, 1883–1997. In F.D. Powell & A.F. Wessen (Eds.), Health care systems in transition (pp. 47-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, O. (1989). The health services continuum in democratic states. An Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. & Taylor, S. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping, Psychological Bulletin 121: 417-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, R., Czok, H., Klein, C., Konrad, K., Schärer, S., Schlesinger, M., Thünte, P.I. & Wiesler, S. (1997). Datenreport Alter [Data report on aging]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bectel, R.W. & Tucker, N.G. (Eds.) (1998). Across the states: Profiles of long-term care system (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: AARP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, M. C. & Blieszner, R. (1997). Planning for long-term care: Filial behavior and relationship quality of adult children with independent parents, Family Relations 46: 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, E. (1996). Die Bestimmung des Umfangs der Pflegebedürftigkeit nach dem Pflegeversicherungsgesetz im interdisziplinåren Vergleich [Assessment of the level of care needs based on the long-term-care insurance], Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 29: 418-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham, W.C., Kunz, G., Leuschen, G. & Spaeth, J.L. (1986). Symptoms, social stratification and self-responsibility for health in the United States and West Germany, Social Science and Medicine 22: 1263-1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C., Dunkle, R.E., Goode, R. & Mackintosh, J. (1982). Discharge planning and decision making, Health and Social Work 7: 253-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth-Anderson, P., Williams, S. W., & Cooper, T. (1999). Family caregiving to elderly African Americans: Caregiver types and structures. Journals of Gerontology, Social Sciences 54B: S237-S241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, J., Komisar, H.L. & Niefeld, M.R. (2000). Long-term care in the United States: An overview, Health Affairs 19(3): 40-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, D. E. (1988). Directions and trends in aging services: A German-American comparison, International Journal of Aging and Human Development 27:57-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, J. & Berry, J. W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology, Cross-cultural Research 29: 121-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groger, L. (1994). Decision as process: A conceptual model of Black elders' nursing home placement, Journal of Aging Studies 8: 77-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagestad, G. O. & Burton, L. M. (1986). Grandparenthood, life context and family development, American Behavioral Scientist 29: 471-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håussler–Sczepan, M. (1998). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer selbståndigen Lebensführung in Einrichtungen [Opportunities and limits of an independent life in elder care homes and nursing homes]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report, European Journal of Psychological Assessment 10: 229-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln [Motivation and action]. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, F. B. & Damon, B. L. (1996). 65+ in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, F. I. & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index, Maryland Medical Journal, 14: 61-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, S. K., Finn, J., Bloom, D. & Andersen, J. (1996). Personal decisionmaking styles and long-term care choices, Health Care Financing Review, 18: 141-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G.B. (2001). American individualism reconsidered. In J.H. Kruglanski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 401-432). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulemann, H. (1996). Werte und Wetewandel: Zur Identitåt einer geteilten und einer wiedervereinigten Nation [Values and value change: On the identity of a separated and reunified nation]. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltenburger, C. & Werner, G. (1992). Zur Bedeutung sozialer Beziehungen bei der Entscheidung zwischen Hauspflege und Altenheim [On the significance of social relations in the decision between home care and nursing home care]. Unpublished dissertation, Free University of Berlin.

  • Pinquart, M. & Sörensen, S. (2000). Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Vorbereitung von Senioren auf einen zukünftigen Hilfs-und Pflegebedarf (FVP): Skalenkonstruktion und teststatistische überprüfung [Development of a questionnaire about preparation for future care needs (PFCN): Scale construction and psychometric properties], Diagnostica 46: 130-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M. & Sörensen, S. (2002). Factors that promote and prevent preparation for future care needs: Perceptions of older Canadian, German, and U.S. women, Health Care of Women International 23: 729-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinardy, J. R. (1992). Decisional control in moving to a nursing home: Postadmission adjustment and well-being, The Gerontologist 32: 96-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, B. (1999). German unity and health care reform. In F. D. Powell, & A. F. Wessen (Eds), Health care systems in transition: An international perspective (pp. 101-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneekloth, U. & Potthoff, P. (1994). Hilfe-und Pflegebedürftige in privaten Haushalten [Community-dwelling persons in need of support and care]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzer, K.P. & Winkler, G. (1993). Alternreport 1992. Zur sozialen Lage und Lebensweise åltere Menschen in den neuen Bundeslåndern [Seniors' report 1992. Social situation and lifestyle of older adults in Eastern Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Morgenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E.A. (1997). Planning and perceived control. In S. L. Friedman & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), Why, how, and when do we plan? The developmental psychology of planning (pp. 263-283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, S. & Zarit, S. H. (1996). Preparation for caregiving: A study of multigeneration families, International Journal of Aging and Human Development 42: 43-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, S. & Pinquart, M. (2000 a). Vulnerability and access to resources as predictors of preparation for future care needs in the elderly, Journal of Aging and Health 12: 275-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, S. & Pinquart, M. (2000 b). Preparation for future care needs by West and East German older adults, Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 55: 357-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, S. & Pinquart, M. (2000 c). Preparation for future care needs: Styles of preparation used by older Eastern German, United States, and Canadian women, Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology 15: 349-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, S. & Pinquart, M. (2001). Developing a measure of older adults' preparation for future care needs, International Journal of Aging and Human Development 53: 137-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sozialgesetzbuch.XI (1996): Soziale Pflegeversicherung mit Nebenbestimmungen [Social statute book XI: Long-term care insurance and supplemental legal requirements]. Munich, Germany: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (1998). Statistiches Jahrbuch für die Bundersrepublik Deutschland 1998 [Statistical yearbook of the FRG 1998]. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U.M., Fleeson, W. & Baltes, P.B. (1999). Predictors of subjective physical health and global well-being: Similarities and differences between the United States and Germany, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:305-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991). Healthy people 2000: National promotion and disease prevention objectives. DHHS Publication no. (PHS) 91–50212, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1999). Statistical Abstract of the United States [On-line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/statab.

  • Vijver, F. van de & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J.M. & Illston, L.H. (1996). The financing and organization of health care for older Americans. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (4th edition, pp. 427-445). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. & Cooper, H. (1983). A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires, Journal of Marketing Research 20: 36-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, W. (1994). Einige Materialien zur Gesellschaft und Demokratie im vereinten Deutschland [Some material on the society and democracy in the unified Germany]. In W. Detting (Ed.), Perspektiven für Deutschland (S. 175-201). München, Germany: Droemer-Knaur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Development Psychology, University of Jena, Am Steiger 3 Haus 1, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Martin Pinquart

  2. University of Rochester, USA

    Silvia Sörensen

  3. University of Georgia, USA

    Adam Davey

Authors
  1. Martin Pinquart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silvia Sörensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Davey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinquart, M., Sörensen, S. & Davey, A. National and Regional Differences in Preparation for Future Care Needs: A Comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 18, 53–78 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024878512547

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024878512547

Search

Navigation