Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of lifestyle factors to socioeconomic differences in obesity in men and women – a population-based study in Sweden

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The objective was to investigate whether and to what extent the association between socioeconomic status and obesity can be explained by lifestyle factors. Methods: The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and obesity, and the role of lifestyle factors such as smoking, physical activity, heavy alcohol use, avoidance of dietary fat and propensity to eat fiber-rich food, was studied in a cross-sectional population-based study consisting of 6394 men and women aged 25–74 years in Värmland County in Sweden. Educational level was used for measuring SES. The contribution of the measured lifestyle factors was assessed using logistic regression models. Results: 12% of men and 14% of women were obese. Subjects with high education were leaner than subjects with low education, except among elderly women (65–74 years). Although many lifestyle factors were related to obesity and SES in this study, only a part (18–29%) of the association between educational level and obesity could be explained by the measured lifestyle factors. Physical inactivity and heavy alcohol use were the main factors contributing to this association, whereas smoking and the measured dietary attitudes towards fat and fiber had little additional effect. Conclusions: The findings of this study are consistent with the view that socioeconomic differences in obesity and its consequences can only partly be reduced by changes in lifestyle. Longitudinal studies, a more detailed investigation of the role of dietary factors and more studies including elderly subjects are, however, recommended to further elucidate the association between SES and obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sobal J, Stunkard J. Socio-economic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychol Bull 1989; 105: 260–275.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Molarius A, Seidell JC, Sans S, Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K for the WHO MONICA Project. Educational level, relative body weight, and changes in their relation over 10 years: an international perspective from the WHO MONICA Project. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 1260–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sundquist J, Johansson SE. The influence of socioeconomic status, ethnicity and lifestyle on body mass index in a longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Berglund G. Sociodemographic factors associated with long-term weight gain, current body fatness and central adiposity in Swedish women. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 685–694.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lissner L, Johansson SE, Qvist J, Rossner S, Wolk A. Social mapping of the obesity epidemic in Sweden. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 801–805.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AE, Groenhof F, Geurts JJM and the EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. Lancet 1997; 349: 1655–1659.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 882–889.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pi-Sunyer FX. Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 655–660.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jousilahti P, Tuomilehto J, Vartiainen E, Pekkanen J, Puska P. Body weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary mortality: 15 year follow-up of middle-aged men and women in eastern Finland. Circulation 1996; 93: 1372–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Björntorp P. Obesity. Lancet 1997; 350: 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martikainen PT, Marmot MG. Socioeconomic differences in weight gain and determinants and consequences of coronary risk factors. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 719–726.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seidell JC, Flegal KM. Asessing obesity: Classification and epidemiology. Br Med Bull 1997; 53: 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lissner L, Heitman BL. Dietary fat and obesity: Evidence from epidemiology. Eur J Clin Nutr 1995; 49: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Molarius A, Seidell JC, Kuulasmaa K, Dobson AJ, Sans S for the WHO MONICA Project. Smoking and relative body weight: An international perspective from the WHO MONICA Project. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1997; 51: 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tremblay A. Physical activity and obesity. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 13: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wagenknecht LE, Perkins LL, Cutter GR, et al. Cigarette smoking behavior is strongly related to educational status: The Cardia Study. Prev Med 1990; 19: 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pekkanen J, Tuomilehto J, Uutela A, Vartiainen E, Nissinen A. Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland. Br Med J 1995; 311: 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manhem K, Dotevall A, Wilhelmsen L, Rosengren A. Social gradients in cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms of Swedishmen and women: The Goteborg MONICA study 1995. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jeffery RW, French SA, Forster JL, Spry VM. Socioeconomic status differences in health behaviours related to obesity: The Healthy Worker Project. Int J Obes 1991; 15: 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeffery RW, French SA. Socioeconomic status and weight control practises among 20-to 45-year-old women. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1005–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wamala SP, Wolk A, Orth-Gomer K. Determinants of obesity in relation to socioeconomic status among middle-aged Swedish women. Prev Med 1997; 26: 734–744.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Obesity - Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva 3-5 June 1997. WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1.

  23. Heitman BL, Lissner L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals - is it specific or non-specific? Br Med J 1995; 311: 986–989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Braam LA, Ocke MC, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Seidell JC. Determinants of obesity-related underreporting of energy intake. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 1081–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shimakawa T, Sorlie P, Carpenter MA, et al. Dietary intake pattern and sociodemographic factors in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. ARIC Study Investigators. Prev Med 1994; 23: 769–780.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Irala-Estevez JD, Groth M, Johansson L, Oltersdorf U, Prattala R, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: Consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 706–714.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lindström M, Hanson BS, Brunner E, et al. Socioeconomic differences in fat intake in a middle-aged population: Report from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Int J Epidemiol 2000; 29: 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kromhout D, Bloemberg B, Seidell JC, Nissinen A, Menotti A. Physical activity and dietary fiber determine population body fat levels: The Seven Countries Study. Int J Obes 2001; 25: 301–306.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eisen SA, Lyons MJ, Goldberg J, True WR. The impact of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on weight and obesity. An analysis of 1911 monozygotic male twin pairs. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 2457–2463.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hellerstedt WI, Jeffery RW, Murray DM. The association between alcohol intake and adiposity in the general population. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 594–611.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suter PM, Hasler E, Vetter W. Effects of alcohol on energy metabolism and body weight regulation: Is alcohol a risk factor for obesity. Nutr Rev 1997; 55: 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosmond R, Lapidus L, Björntorp P. The influence of occupational and social factors on obesity and body fat distribution in middle-aged men. Int J Obes 1996; 20: 599–607.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wardle J, Griffith J. Socio-economic status and weight control practices in British adults. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2001; 55: 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuskowska-Wolk A, Rössner S. The ‘true’ prevalence of obesity. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989; 7: 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Plankey MW, Stevens J, Flegal KM, Rust PF. Prediction equations do not eliminate systematic error in self-reported body mass index. Obes Res 1997; 5: 308–314.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 331–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molarius, A. The contribution of lifestyle factors to socioeconomic differences in obesity in men and women – a population-based study in Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 18, 227–229 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023376012627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023376012627

Navigation