Abstract
The use of stimulus modifications in teaching involves altering the materials of a task in order to simplify its execution. Though their use in teaching stimulus discriminations to people with developmental disabilities has been extensively investigated, less attention has been given to their utilization in teaching response topography. This paper offers some general guidelines about their use for this purpose. In relation to their design, it is suggested that the aim should be to reduce the demands made by task components, to eliminate components, and/or to increase the attentional value of the discriminating features of the response topography. In relation to their application, guidelines are suggested about when they should be employed in conjunction with response prompts; when they should be used, either alone or in conjunction with response prompts, in preference to response prompts alone; whether one or a series of modifications is required; and at what point during teaching should probe trials on the unmodified task be introduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ager, A. (1989). Behavioural teaching strategies for people with severe and profound mental handicaps: A re-examination. Ment. Hand. 17: 56–59.
Azrin, N. H., Schaeffer, R. M., and Wesolowski, M. D. (1976). A rapid method of teaching mentally retarded persons to dress by a reinforcement-guidance method. Ment. Retard. 14: 29–33.
Balla, D., and Zigler, E. (1979). Personality development in retarded persons. In Ellis, N. R. (ed.), Handbook of Mental Deficiency: Psychological Theory and Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 143–168.
Close, D. W., Irvin, L. K., Prehm, H. J., and Taylor, V. E. (1978). Systematic correction procedures in vocational skill training of severely retarded individuals. Am. J. Ment. Def. 83: 270–275.
Doran, J., and Holland, J. G. (1979). Control by stimulus features during fading. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 31: 177–187.
Engelmann, S., and Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of Instruction: Principles and Application, Irvington, New York.
Etzel, B. C., and LeBlanc, J. M. (1979). The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional, control, and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. J. Aut. Dev. Dis. 9: 361–382.
Gold, M. W., and Barclay, C. R. (1973). The learning of difficult visual discriminations by the moderately and severely retarded. Ment. Retard. 17: 9–11.
Lansdale, M., and How, T. T. (1996). An analysis of errors in the learning, overlearning, and forgetting of sequences. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 49A: 341–356.
Mosk, M. D., and Bucher, B. (1984). Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 17: 23–34.
Riley, G. A. (1990). Prompting strategies for those with a severe mental handicap: A comparison of procedures using only response prompts with a procedure combining stimulus and response prompts. Behav. Psychother. 18: 193–206.
Riley, G. A. (1993). The use of prompts in teaching people with a learning disability, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation; University of Leicester, U.K.
Riley, G.A. (1996). The effectiveness of stimulus modification procedures in teaching response topography to individuals with severe developmental disability. Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 24: 371–375.
Ruggles, T. R., and LeBlanc, J. M. (1982). Behavior analysis procedures in classroom teaching. In Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., and Kazdin, A. E. (eds.), International Handbook of Behavior modification and Therapy, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 979–993.
Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor Learning and Performance. Human Kinetic Books, Champaign, IL.
Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Rev. 84: 127–190.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative Record, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Smyth, M. M., Morris, P., Levy, P., and Ellis, A. W. (1993). Cognition in Action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Stoddard, L. T., and Gerovac, B. J. (1981). A stimulus shaping method for teaching complex motor performance to severely and profoundly retarded individuals. Appl. Res. Ment. Retard. 2: 281–295.
Touchette, P. E., and Howard, J. S. (1984). Errorless learning: Reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 17: 175–188.
Wilson, B. A., Baddeley, A., Evans, J., and Shiel, A. (1994). Errorless learning in the rehabiilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychological Rehab. 4: 307–326.
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., and Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching Students with Moderate to Severe Disabilities—Use of Response Prompting Strategies, Longman, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riley, G.A. Some Guidelines for the Use of Stimulus Modifications in Teaching Response Topography to People with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 10, 153–165 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022865332522
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022865332522