Skip to main content
Log in

The Productivity of US States since 1880

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses state-level variation in labor productivity levels at twenty-year intervals between 1880 and 1980 to examine the relative importance of institutional and geographical influences in explaining observed and persistent differences in standards of living over time and across regions. Focusing on fundamental rather than proximate influences, we find that both institutional characteristics and some physical geography characteristics account for a high proportion of the differences in state productivity levels: states with navigable waterways, a large minerals endowment, and no slaves in 1860, on average, had higher labor productivity levels throughout the sample period. However, we find little support for two other influences that have previously received attention—climate and latitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz, M., and P. A. David. (1996). “Convergence and Deferred Catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism.” In R. Landau, T. Taylor and G. Wright (eds), The Mosaic of Economic Growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. (2001). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economic Review 91, 1369-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. (2002). “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1231-1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, P. E., D. N. DeJong, and W. Troesken, “Population Growth in U.S. Counties, 1840–1990,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 31(6), 669-699.

  • Bernard, A. B., and C. I. Jones. (1996). “Productivity and Convergence across U.S. States and Industries,” Empirical Economics 21, 113-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley, H. (2002). “Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South”, mimeo, available at http://web.mit.edu/hoyt/www/home.html

  • Bloom, D. E., and J. D. Sachs. (1998). “Geography, Demography, and Economic Growth in Africa,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 207-295.

  • Brinkley, G. L. (1997). “The Decline in Southern Agricultural Output, 1860–1880,” Journal of Economic History 57, 116-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., and R. E. Hall. (1996). “Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,” American Economic Review 86, 54-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, P. R., and R. A. McGuire. (1997). “African and European Bound Labor in the British New World: The Biological Consequences of Economic Choices,” Journal of Economic History 57, 83-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., and J. W. Gunning. (1999). “Explaining African Economic Performance,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 64-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J. (ed.) (1993). Encyclopedia of the North American Colonies, Vol 1, New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, P. D. (1989). Death by Migration: Europe's Encounter with the Tropical World in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, J. D. (1992). “The Indian Population of North America in 1492,” The William and Mary Quarterly 49(2), 298-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., and G. Wright. (1997). “Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance,” Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 203-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford Unviersity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. J., and I. W. McLean. (1994). “The Supply of Gold under the Pre-1914 Gold Standard,” Economic History Review 47, 288-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S. L., and K. L. Sokoloff. (1997). “Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economics.” In S. Haber (ed.), How Latin America Fell Behind: Essays on the Economic Histories of Brazil and Mexico, 1800–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, R. (1995). Factor Proportions, Trade, and Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R., and S. Engerman. (1974). Time on the Cross. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, J. L., J. D. Sachs, and A. Mellinger. (1999). “Geography and Economic Development.” In B. Pleskovic and J. E. Stiglitz (eds), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1998. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 127-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., and C. I. Jones. (1996). “The Productivity of Nations,” Working Paper No 5812, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Hall, R. E., and C. I. Jones. (1999). “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 83-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. C. (1930). The Religious Background of American Culture. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. J. (1998). “The Effect of State Policies on the Location of Manufacturing: Evidence from State Borders,” Journal of Political Economy 106(4), 667-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. R. (1994). “Explaining the Decline in Southern per Capita Output after Emancipation,” Explorations in Economic History 31, 336-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. L. (1981). The European Miracle: Environments, Economies, and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D. (1998). Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Factor Endowments, Culture, and Politics on Long-Run Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. S. (1990). “Why Are We So Rich and They So Poor?” American Economic Review 80, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1840). Statistical Report on the Sickness and Mortality in the Army of the United States. Washington: Jacob Gideon, Jr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1856). Statistical Report on the Sickness and Mortality in the Army of the United States. Washington: A.O.P. Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. R. Jr. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddex, R. L. (1998). State Constitutions of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, S. (ed.) (1998). The Gale Encyclopedia of Native American Tribes. Gale: Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. A., and M. S. McMillan. (2001). “Climate and Scale in Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 6, 167-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (1992). “Agricultural Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic Theory 58, 317-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. W., and J. D. Sachs. (2001). “Institutions and Geography: Comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000)”, Working Paper 8114, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • McCusker, John J., and Russell R. Menard. (1985). The Economy of British America, 1607–1789. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellinger, A. D., J. D. Sachs, and J. L. Gallup. (2000). “Climate, Coastal Proximity, and Development.” In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. R., and C. P. Brainerd. (1957). “Labor Force Estimates.” In Everett S. Lee et al. Population Redistribution and Economic Growth: United States, 1870–1950, vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchener, K. J., and McLean, I. W. (1999). “U.S. Regional Growth and Convergence, 1880–1980,” Journal of Economic History 59, 1,016-1,042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J. (1928). The Aboriginal Population North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., and G. Wright. (1992). “The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar era in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature 30, 1931-1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). “Climate and Economic Development.” In Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1993, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., and R.P. Thomas. (1973). The Rise of the Western World: An Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, A. P., and W. G. Shade. (2001). “One Kind of Freedom Reconsidered: African-American Economic Life in the Segregation Era,” Special Issue, Explorations in Economic History 38, 1-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paullin, C. O. (1932). Atlas of the Historical Geography of the United States. Washington: Carnegie Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, H. S. et al. (1960). Regions, Resources, and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000). The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (1997). “Divergence, Big Time,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (1999). “Tropics and Income: A Longitudinal Study of the U.S. States,” Review of Income and Wealth 45, 373-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, R., and R. Sutch. (1977). One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. (1999). “Dynamic Comparative Advantage and the Welfare Effects of Trade,” Oxford Economic Papers 51, 15-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., and L. E. Birdzell. (1986). How the West grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Western World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D., and A. M. Warner. (1995a). “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1-95.

  • Sachs, J. D., and A. M. Warner. (1995b). “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth,” Working Paper 5398 (December), National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Steckel, R. H. (2000). “African American Population.” In M. R. Haines and R. H. Steckel (eds), A Population History of North America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, W. C. (ed.) (1978). Handbook of North American Indians. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. R. (1951). The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin, P. (1976). “The Postbellum Recovery of the South and the Cost of the Civil War,” Journal of Economic History 36, 898-907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. (1999). “The New Growth Evidence,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 112-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J., and P. A. Johnson. (1998). “Social Capability and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 965-990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. (1988). “North American Indian Population Size, A.D. 1500–1985,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 77(3), 289-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1909). A Century of Population Growth in the United States 1790–1900. Department of Commerce and Labor Bureau of the Census: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1975). Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Bureau of the Census: Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (various years). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO.

  • Wright, G. (1974). “Cotton Competition and the Post Bellum Recovery of the American South,” Journal of Economic History 34, 610-635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (1986). Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (1987). “Economic Revolution in the American South,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 161-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (1990). “The Origins of American Industrial Success, 1879–1940,” American Economic Review 80, 651-668.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchener, K.J., McLean, I.W. The Productivity of US States since 1880. Journal of Economic Growth 8, 73–114 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022812917582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022812917582

Navigation