Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Insecticides and Fungicides on the Interaction between Members of the Mite Families Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae on Citrus

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate the effect of some insecticides and fungicides on the interaction between predacious mites of the families Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae on citrus. Euseius citrifolius Denmark and Muma, Euseius concordis (Chant) (Phytoseiidae), and Agistemus aff. bakeri (Stigmaeidae) were the most abundant species of predacious mites. No significant reduction of the population of stigmaeids was detected following the pesticide treatment. On the contrary, the population of those mites increased after the application of methidathion, petroleum oil, deltamethrin, cupric oxychloride and cuprous oxide, as compared to the population of those mites in the control plots. The chemicals promoting increased stigmaeid populations are some of those that promoted reduction of phytoseiid populations. A significant negative correlation was found between the numbers of phytoseiids and stigmaeids on citrus leaves immediately before treatments, and 33, 50, 83 and 105 days after treatment. A clear negative linear correlation between the number of predacious mites from both families was detected for benomyl, cupric oxychloride, cuprous oxide, thiophanate methyl, and control. Phytoseiid–stigmaeid interaction on citrus orchard is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clements, D.R. andHarmsen, R. 1990. Predatory behaviour and prey-stage preferences of stigmaeid and phytoseiid mites and their potential compatibility in biological control. Can. Entomol. 122: 321-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D.R. andHarmsen, R. 1992. Stigmaeid-phytoseiid interactions and the impact of natural enemy complexes on plant-inhabiting mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 14: 327-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. andBlyth, E.J. 1979. Aspects of the functional, ovipositional and starvation response of Amblyseius fallacis to prey density. Rec. Adv. Acarol. 1: 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. andMacRae, I. V. 1992. Persistence of Typhlodromus pyri and Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on apple after inoculative release and competition with Zetzellia mali (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on apple after inoculative release and competition Zetzellia mali (Acari: Stigmaeidae). Environ. Entomol. 21: 1168-1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. andMacRae, I.V. 1993. Biological control of apple mites: impact of Zetzellia mali (Acari: Stigmaeidae) on Typhlodromus pyri and Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 865-873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. andSlone, D.H. 1997. Equilibrium densities of European red mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) after exposure to three levels of predaceous mite diversity on apple. Environ. Entomol. 26: 391-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moraes, G.J. 1991. Controle biológico de ácaros fitófagos. Inf. Agropec. 15: 55-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moraes, G.J. andLima, H.C. 1983. Biology of Euseius concordis (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) a predator of the tomato russet mite. Acarologia 24: 251-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moraes, G.J. andMcMurtry, J.A. 1981. Biology of Amblyseius citrifolius (Denmark and Muma) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Hilgardia 49: 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moraes, G.J.McMurtry, J.A. andDenmark, H.A. 1986. A Catalog of the Mite Family Phytoseiidae: Reference to Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution and Habitat. EMBRAPA/DDT, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravena, S.Benetoli, I.Moreira, P.H.R. andYamamoto, P.T. 1994. Euseius citrifolius Denmark and Muma predation on citrus leprosis mite Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Tenuipalpidae). An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 23: 209-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle, W. andSabelis, M.W. 1985. Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.T. andCroft, B.A. 1981. Dispersal of Amblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in an apple ecosystem. Environ. Entomol. 10: 313-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu, S.S. 1988. Aspectos bioetológicos de Euseius concordis (Chant, 1959) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) e seletividade dos acaricidas convencionais nos citros. MSc Dissertation, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, I.V. andCroft, B.A. 1996. Differential impact of egg predation by Zetzellia mali (Acari: Stigmaeidae) on Metaseiulus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 143-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, P.H.R. 1993. Ocorrência, dinâmica populacional de ácaros predadores em citros e biologia de Euseius citrifolius (Acari: Phytoseiidae). MSc Dissertation, FCAVJ/UNESP, Jaboticabal, 110 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, P.R.Chiavegato, L.G.Alves, E.B. andSousa, E.O. 2000. Ácaros da família Phytoseiidae associados aos citros no Município de Lavras, Sul de Minas Gerais. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 29: 95-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Part 1: Modeling the predator-prey interaction at the individual level. Agric. Res. Rep., 242 pp., Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Santos, M.A. andLaing, J.E. 1985. Stigmaeid predators. In: Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, W. Helle andM.W. Sabelis (eds), Vol. 1B, pp. 197-203. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1991. SAS Language and Procedures: Usage 2, Version 6, 1st edn. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M.E.Raga, A.Cerávolo, L.C.Rossi, A.C. andPotenza, M.R. 1994. Ácaros predadores em pomar cítrico de Presidente Prudente, Estado de São Paulo. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 23: 435-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slone, D.H. andCroft, B.A. 2001. Species association among predaceous and phytophagous apple mites (Acari: Eriophyidae, Phytoseiidae, Stigmaeidae, Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 109-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde, S.J.Hardman, J.M. andMagagula, C.N. 1997. Direct and indirect species interactions influencing within-season dynamics of apple rust mite, Aculus schlechtendali (Acari: Eriophyidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 587-614.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N.D.G. andLaing, J.E. 1977. Some aspects of the biology and a laboratory life table of the acarine predator Zetzellia mali. Can. Entomol. 109: 1275-1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, M.E.J. andHarmsen, R. 1984. The mite complex on foliage of a pesticide-free apple orchard population dynamics and habitat associations. Proc. Ent. Soc. Ont. 115: 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, P.T. 1994. Biologia do ácaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark and Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). MSc Dissertation, FCAVJ/UNESP, Jaboticabal, 81 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, M.E., Raga, A., Cerávolo, L.C. et al. Effect of Insecticides and Fungicides on the Interaction between Members of the Mite Families Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae on Citrus. Exp Appl Acarol 25, 809–818 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020483515516

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020483515516

Navigation