Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of 14 MeV-NAA, k0-NAA and ED-XRF for air pollution bio-monitoring

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the performances and the limitations of three multi-elementary analysis techniques are compared applied to a study of air pollution biomonitoring in Morocco. These techniques are: (1) 14 MeV neutron activation analysis (14 MeV-NAA), (2) thermal neutron activation analysis using the k 0 quasi-absolute method (k 0-NAA) and (3) energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis (ED-XRF). The experimental procedures and the control of the analytical results using certified reference materials are described and discussed. The three methods were confronted for the analysis of lichens, mosses and tree-barks. The complementarity of these methods enabled us to determine 43 elements in different samples. The most suitable method for each element was selected according to the sensitivity and selectivity necessitating the minimum corrections of the matrix effects and/or the interfering reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. DE BRUIN, Bulletin de l'AIEA, Vol. 32, No. 4 (1990) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. C. FREITAS, A. S. NOBRE, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 217 (1997) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. KUIK, H. T. WOLTERBEEK, Water, Air Soil Pollut., 84 (1995) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. REVEL, S. AYRAULT, J. Radioanal Nucl. Chem., 244 (2000) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. SENHOU, A. CHOUAK, M. BERRADA, M. LFERDE, JMSTA, Octobre 1999, Meknes, Morocco.

  6. M. BORMAN, Handbook on Nuclear Activation Cross-Section, Technical Reports Series, No. 156, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. BöDY, J. CSIKAI, Handbook on Nuclear Activation Data, Technical Reports Series, No. 273, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. REUS, W. WESTMEIER, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 29, No. 1, Academic Press, Germany, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. PICCOT, C. DESCHAMPS, R. DELMAS, G. REVEL, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 215, (1997) 263.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. VAN-ESPEN, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 142 (1977) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. BOUNAKHLA, Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat, Université Ibn Tofail, Kénitra, Maroc, 1998.

  12. A. MARKOWICZ, X-ray Spectrom., 8 (1979) No. 1.

  13. J. LEROUX, M. MAHMUD, Anal. Chem., 38 (1966) 76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. STEINNES, A. RüHLING, H. LIPPO, A. MäKINEN, Reference Materials for Large-scale Metal Deposition Surveys, Accred. Qual. Assur, 2 (1997) 243, Springer-Verlag, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  15. IAEA, Trace and Minor Elements in Lichen, Analytical Duality Control Service, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senhou, A., Chouak, A., Cherkaoui, R. et al. Comparison of 14 MeV-NAA, k0-NAA and ED-XRF for air pollution bio-monitoring. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 253, 247–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019697725334

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019697725334

Keywords

Navigation