Skip to main content
Log in

Time-Dependent Absorption of Phenprobamate Following Multiple Dosing in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unusual serum profiles of phenprobamate, a centrally skeletal muscle relaxant, were observed in Sprague Dawley rats receiving multiple doses of phenprobamate suspension. The concentrations of phenprobamate were higher after the morning doses than after the evening doses, synchronizing with the day–night pattern of drug administration. Crossover studies were conducted to investigate the apparent time-dependent kinetics of phenprobamate. Phenprobamate emulsion was orally administered as a single dose to a group of six rats at 0900 hr and again, after a washout period of 3 days, at 2100 hr. Another group of six rats was treated similarly with intraperitoneal drug administration. Blood samples were collected at various times for 12 hr. The AUCs were 146.56 ± 31.77 µg · hr/ml for the morning oral dose and 111.31 ± 21.32 µg · hr/ml for the evening oral dose (P < 0.001). Administered intraperitoneally, the AUCs were 179.89 ± 37.50 and 185.58 ± 28.51 µg · hr/ml for the morning and evening doses, respectively, the difference of which was not significant. The paired t test indicated a significant morning–evening difference in AUC following oral but not intraperitoneal drug administration. This suggests the absorption rather than metabolism as a contributing factor to the time-dependent kinetics of phenprobamate in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. Clench, A. Reinberg, Z. Dziewanowska, J. Ghata, and M. H. Smolensky. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 20:359–369 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. G. Maxey, M. H. Smolensky, and J. P. Mcgovern. In A. Reinberg and F. Halberg (eds.), Chronopharmacology, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979, pp. 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. S. Minors and J. M. Waterhouse. Chronobiologia 7:465–480 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Hollander, M. Kielb, and E. Rim. Am. J. Digest. Dis. 23:1125–1128 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Wobel and G. Nagel. Experimentia 35:1581–1582 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Kabasakalian, M. Katz, B. Rosenkrantz, and E. Townley. J. Pharm. Sci. 59:595–600 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. B. Kathe. Aerzliche Praxis 43:2385–2388 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kuriyama and K. Okada. Eisei Kagaku 11:176–180 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Schatz and U. Jahn. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 16:866–870 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Swinyard and W. Lowenthal. In A. R. Gennaro (eds.), Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack, Pa., 1985, p. 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. X. S. Sun, K. Embil, D. S. C. Chow, and C. S. Lee. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 8:341–351 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. G. Wagner and E. Nelson. J. Pharm. Sci. 53:1392–1403 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pharmaceutical Research Press.

  14. K. J. Ho. Am. J. Physiol. 230:1331–1335 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. J. Ho and J. L. Drummond. Am. J. Physiol. 299:1427–1437 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. J. Ho. J. Lipid Res. 17:600–604 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, J.XS., Embil, K. & Lee, CS.C. Time-Dependent Absorption of Phenprobamate Following Multiple Dosing in Rats. Pharm Res 5, 387–390 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015967829826

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015967829826

Navigation