Skip to main content
Log in

Physical State of Misoprostol in Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Films

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scanning electron (SEM) and light microscopy (LM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) techniques were utilized to determine the miscibility of misoprostol and HPMC in the films with a misoprostol content from 0 to 29%, prepared using ethanol and methylene chloride/methanol (MeCl2/methanol, 50:50). Transmission infrared (TIR) analysis was used to look for evidence of any interaction between misoprostol and HPMC. The LM and SEM analysis of the ethanol cast films indicated no oil droplets. The DSC thermograms of the films showed no evidence of a −33°C transition, which is characteristic of pure misoprostol. The DMA showed that the glass–rubber transition temperature (T g) of the pure HPMC was lowered from 163 to 125–130 and 85–87°C in the presence of 10 and 27–28% misoprostol. Based on these results it is suggested that misoprostol is solubilized in HPMC at concentrations up to 29%. The TIR analysis of the films showed no evidence of interaction between misoprostol and HPMC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. R. Sanvordeker, U.S. patent 4,301,146 (to G. D. Searle & Co.) (1981).

  2. F. Gejl-Hansen and J. M. Flink. J. Food. Sci. 42:1049–1055 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. C. To and J. M. Flink. J. Food. Technol. 13:583–594 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. T. Kararli and T. Catalano. Pharm. Res. 7:1186–1189 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. O. Okhamafe and P. York. Pharm. Res. 2:19–23 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. O. Okhamafe and P. York. J. Pharm. Sci. 77:438–443 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Maeda and D. R. Paul. J. Poly. Sci. Poly. Phys. Ed. 25:957–980 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. G. Biliaderis, C. M. Page, T. J. Maurice, and B. O. Juliano. J. Agr. Food Chem. 34:6–16 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Kaur, D. J. W. Grant, and T. Eaves. J. Pharm. Sci. 69:1317–1321 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. T. Kararli, T. E. Needham, C. J. Ceul, and P. M. Finnegan. Pharm. Res. 6:804–808 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. L. Fung and M. J. Cho. J. Pharm. Sci. 67:971–975 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Toledo-Valesquez, K. A. Connars, and H. T. Gaud. Pharm. Res. 6:S-128 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Slade, H. Levine, and J. W. Finley In R. D. Phillips and J. W. Finley (eds.), Protein Quality and the Effects of Processing, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, pp. 9–124.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. F. Fedors. Polym. Eng. Sci. 14:147–154 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Jayasri and M. Yaseen. J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc. 63:61–69 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kararli, T.T., Needham, T.E., Seul, C.J. et al. Physical State of Misoprostol in Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Films. Pharm Res 7, 1181–1185 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015944628723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015944628723

Navigation