Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paternal preconceptional irradiation, population mixing and solid tumorsin the children of radiation workers (England)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether there was an increased incidence of solid tumors among offspring of male radiation workers at the Sellafield nuclear installation in Cumbria, northwest England and whether paternal preconceptional irradiation was associated with the risk of solid tumors. Methods: A cohort study of 266,710 live births in Cumbria, 1950–1991, followed up to age 25 years on the end of 1991. Results: Children of radiation workers had a non-significantly increased risk of solid tumors (RR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9–2.4, p = 0.09), determined largely by an increased risk of cancers excluding leukemias, lymphomas, brain, spinal and gender-specific tumors (RR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0–3.3, p = 0.05), which was partly explained by differing patterns of parental migration (adjusted RR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.8–3.2, p = 0.50). Within children of radiation workers there was no evidence of an increased risk with increasing paternal preconception dose of external radiation (hazard ratio per 100 mSv for all solid tumors = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.1–1.8, p = 0.52). Conclusions: Any observed excess of solid tumors in children of radiation workers may be partly explained by population mixing. Fathers' occupational exposure to radiation before conception was not found to be risk factor for solid tumors in their children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HSE (1993) Investigation of Leukaemia and Other Cancers in the Children of Male Workers at Sellafield. Sudbury: HSE Books.

  2. Kinlen LJ (2000) Infection, childhood leukaemia and the Seascale cluster. Radiol Prot Bull 226: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner ML, Snee MP, Hall AJ, Powell CA, Downes S, Terrell JD (1990) Results of case-control studyof leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. BMJ 300: 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Draper GJ, Little MP, Sorahan T, et al. (1997) Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: a record linkage study. BMJ 315: 1181–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roman E, Doyle P, Maconochie N, Davies G, Smith PG, Beral V (1999) Cancer in children of nuclear industryemploy ees: report on children aged under 25 years from nuclear industry family study. BMJ 318: 1443–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cardis E, Gilbert ES, Carpenter L, Howe G, Salmon L (1995) Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortalityamong nuclear industryworkers in three countries. Radiat Res 142: 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haines A, Ashcroft R, Coggon D, et al. (2000) Personal information in medical research. London: Medical Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parker L, Smith J, Dickinson H, et al. (1997) The creation of a database of children of workers at a nuclear facility: an exercise in record linkage. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 12: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker L, Pearce MS, Dickinson HO, Aitkin M, Craft A (1999) Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant. Lancet 354: 1407–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dickinson HO, Salotti J, Birch P, Reid MM, Malcolm A, Parker L (2001) How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified bythe National Health Service Central Register? J Epidemiol Commun Health 55: 414–422.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Birch JM, Marsden HB (1987) A classification scheme for childhood cancer. Int J Cancer 40: 620–624.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kramarova E, Stiller CA (1996) The International Classification of Childhood Cancer. Int J Cancer 68: 759–765.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dickinson HO, Parker L (1999) Quantifying the effect of population mixing on childhood leukaemia risk: the Seascale cluster. Br J Cancer 81: 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aitkin M, Anderson D, Francis B, Hinde J (1989) Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mander A, Clayton D (1999) Hotdeck imputation. Stata Tech Bull 51: 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin DB, Schenker N (1986) Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse. J Am Stat Assoc 81: 366–374.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grambsch PM, Therneau TM(1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81: 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parkin DM, Kramarova E, Draper GJ, et al. (1998) International Incidence of Childhood Cancer. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.

  20. Little MP, Wakeford R, Charles MW (1994) An analysis of leukaemia, lymphoma and other malignancies together with certain categories of non-cancer mortalityin the first generation offspring (F1) of the Japanese bomb survivors. J Radiol Prot 14: 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Tucker K, Greaves JA, Greaves C, Buchanan J (1997) Epidemiological Evaluation of Childhood Leukaemia and Paternal Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Seattle: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickinson, H., Parker, L., Salotti, J. et al. Paternal preconceptional irradiation, population mixing and solid tumorsin the children of radiation workers (England). Cancer Causes Control 13, 183–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014384232617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014384232617

Navigation