Abstract
While regional innovation systems are, to some extent, an artefact of regional administration and mimesis, there are also clear proximity and agglomeration dynamics. A third type of dynamic at play derives from uptake of knowledge production, regional role of universities etc. The advent of strategic science, with its double emphasis on relevance (including local relevance) and global competition, creates pressures on universities which want to play a regional role as well. The University of Twente, in The Netherlands, is an example. Its evolution shows that the regional function leans heavily on institutional differentiations like outreach units, while strategic science is taken up in new outward looking, problem-solving centres, not necessarily directed towards the region. The immediate moral is that universities can play a role in managing the tension between local (regional) and global, but the tensions will return internally. The general moral is that the changes in knowledge production (whether labeled as strategic science or Mode 2 or whatever) have to be taken into account in regional innovation systems. This might also help to avoid a short-sighted focus on wealth creation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asheim, B.T. and A. Isaksen, 2002, ‘Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local “Sticky” and global “Ubiquitous” Knowledge’, Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1), 77-86.
Caracostas, P. and L. Soete, 1997, ‘The Building of Cross-Border Institutions in Europe: Towards a European System of Innovation?’, in C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter, pp. 395-419.
Burton, R.C., 1998, Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford: Pergamon.
Cooke, P., 2002, ‘Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some NewEvidence from Biotechnology Clusters’, Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1), 135-147.
Cooke, P., F. Moulaert, E. Swyngedouw, O. Weinstein, and P. Wells, 1992, Towards Global Localisation, London: UCL Press.
De la Mothe, J. and G. Paquet (eds.), 1998, Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Deuten, J.J. A. Rip, and W. Smit, 1998, Nieuwe werelden...met micro-optica. Scenario's en scripts en wat deze impliceren voor micro-optica onderzoek aan de Universiteit Twente (Enschede: Universiteit Twente, Faculteit Wijsbegeerte en Maatschappijwetenschappen, February 1998), 58 pp.
Duysters, G. and J. Hagedoorn, 1996, ‘Internationalization of Corporate Technology Through Strategic Partnering: An Empirical Investigation’, Research Policy 25, 1-12.
Edquist, C. (ed.), 1997, Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter.
European Consortium of Innovative Universities (ECIU), 1997, Charter, signed at Dortmund, November 18.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff, 2000, ‘The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Research Policy 29, 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B.R.C. Terra, 2000, ‘The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm’, Research Policy 29, 313-330.
Freeman, C. 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Pinter.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowothy, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow, 1994, The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage.
Hagedoorn, J. and J. Schakenraad, 1990, ‘Interfirm Partnerships and Co-Operative Strategies in Core Technologies’, in C. Freeman and L. Soete (eds.), New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change, London: Pinter. pp. 3-37.
Håkansson, H. and I. Snehota (eds.), 1995, Developing Relationships in Business Networks, London: Routledge.
Irvine, J. and B.R. Martin, 1984. Foresight in Science. Picking the Winners, London: Pinter.
Jacobs, D. 1998, ‘Innovation Policies Within the Framework of Internationalization’, Research Policy 27, 711-724.
Kaghan, W.N. 2000, ‘Harnessing a Public Conglomerate: Professional Technology Transfer Managers and the Entrepreneurial University’, in J. Croissant and S. Restivo (eds.), Degrees of Compromise: Industrial Interests and Academic Values, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Landabaso, M., C. Oughton, and K. Morgan, 2002, ‘Regional Innovation Systems and Regional Innovation Strategies: Theory, Policy and Practice’, Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1), 97-110.
Larédo, P. 1994, L'impact des programmes communautaires de recherche en France, Paris: Centre Sociologie de ‘Innovation, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines.
Meyer-Krahmer, F. 1999, ‘Was bedeutet Globalisierung für Aufgaben und Handlungsspielraüme nationaler Innovationspolitiken?’, in K. Grimme, S. Kuhlmann, F. Meyer-Krahmer (Hrsg.), Innovationspolitik in globalisierte Arenen, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Mustar, P. 1997, ‘How French Academics Create Hi-Tech Companies: The Conditions for Success or Failure’, Science and Public Policy 24, 37-43.
Nelson, R.R. (ed.), 1993, National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD, 1971, Science, Growth and Society. A New Perspective, OECD, Paris, Report of the Secretary-General's Ad Hoc Group on New Concepts of Science Policy, chaired by Harvey Brooks.
Pavitt, K. 1984, ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy 13, 343-373.
Pouder, R. and C.H. St. John, 1996, ‘Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation’, Academy of Management Review 21, 1192-1225.
Rip, A. 1997, ‘A Cognitive Approach to Relevance of Science’, Social Science Information 36(4), 615-640.
Rip, A. 2000, ‘Fashions, Lock-Ins and the Heterogeneity of Knowledge Production’, in M. Jacob and T. Hellstrom (eds.), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 28-39.
Rip, A. and B.J.R. van der Meulen, 1996, ‘The Post-Modern Research System’, Science & Public Policy 23 (5), 343-352 (also published in Rémi Barré, Michael Gibbons, John Maddox, B. Martin, and P. Papon (eds.), 1997, Science in Tomorrow's Europe, Paris: Economica International, pp. 51-67).
Saxenian, A. 1998, ‘Regional Systems of Innovation and the Blurred Firm’, in J. De La Mothe and G. Paquet (eds.), Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 29-43.
Segal N., 1998, Regional Development and the European Consortium of Innovative Universities. A Report to the Consortium, Enschede: December 1998.
Teece, D.J., 1986, ‘Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Colaboration, Licensing and Public Policy’, Research Policy 15, 285-305.
Van Lente, H. and A. Rip, 1998, ‘The Rise of Membrane Technology: From Rhetorics to Social Reality’, Social Studies of Science 221-254.
Van der Sijde, P.C. and J.A. van Alsté, 1998, ‘Support for Entrepreneurship at the University of Twente’, Industry & Higher Education 12, 367-372.
Van der Sijde, P.C. and G.A. Van Driem, 1999, ‘Incubation Infrastructure for Knowledge-Intensive Companies Around the University of Twente’, Industry and Higher Education 13, 243-247.
Van der Sijde, P. and J. Van Tilburg, 2000, 'support of University Spin-Off Companies’, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Feb. 13-21.
Voyer, R., 1998, ‘Knowledge-Based Industrial Clustering: International Comparisons’, in J. De La Mothe and G. Paquet (eds.), Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 81-109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rip, A. Regional Innovation Systems and the Advent of Strategic Science. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 123–131 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013108906611
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013108906611