Abstract
Objectives: As part of a larger study exploring psychosocial factors that influence self-care and use of health care services during pregnancy, we investigated the process of pregnancy discovery and acceptance among a culturally diverse group of women who had given birth to their first child in the year preceding data collection. Methods: Eighty-seven low-income women from four cultural groups (African American, Mexican, Puerto Rican, and white) participated in eight focus groups held in their communities. The focus groups were ethnically homogenous and stratified by early and late entry into prenatal care. A social influence model guided the development of focus group questions, and the study followed a participatory action research model, with community members involved in all phases of the research. Results: Issues that emerged from the focus groups as possible influences on timing of pregnancy recognition include the role of pregnancy signs and symptoms and pregnancy risk perception in the discovery process, the role of social network members in labeling and affirming the pregnancy, concerns about disclosure, “planning” status of the pregnancy, and perceived availability of choices for resolving an unintended pregnancy. Conclusions: The pregnancy discovery process is complex, and when protracted, can potentially result in delayed initiation of both prenatal care and healthful pregnancy behaviors. Enhancing our understanding of pregnancy discovery and acceptance has clear implications for primary and secondary prevention. Future research is needed to further explain the trajectory of pregnancy discovery and acceptance and its influence on health behaviors and pregnancy outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Michaels GY, Goldberg WA. The transition to parenthood: Current theory and research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Holt LH. Medical perspectives on pregnancy and birth: Biological risks and technological advances. In: Michaels GY, Goldberg WA, editors. The transition to parenthood: Current theory and research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988:157–75.
Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LLS, Piccinino LJ. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 1997;23(19):1–114.
Orr ST, Miller CA. Unintended pregnancy and the psychosocial well-being of pregnant women. Womens Health Issues 1997;7:38–46.
Leathers S, Kelley MA. Unintended pregnancy and depressive symptoms among first-time mothers and fathers. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2000;70:523–31.
Altemeier WA, O'Connor S, Vietze P, Sandler H, Sherrod K. Prediction of child abuse: A prospective study of feasibility. Child Abuse Negl 1984;8:393–400.
Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, Bruce FC, Marks JS, Zahniser SC, and the PRAMS Working Group. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1031–8.
Zuravin SJ. Unplanned pregnancies, family planning problems, and child maltreatment. Fam Relations 1987;36:135–9.
Orr ST, Miller CA, James SA, Babones S. Unintented pregnancy and preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000;14:309–13.
Israel B, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:173–202.
Stringer E. Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
Gottlieb B, Pancer SM. Social networks and the transition to parenthood. In: Michaels GY, Goldberg WA, editors. The transition to parenthood: Current theory and research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988:235–69.
Angel R, Worobey JL. Single motherhood and children's health. J Health Soc Behav 1988;29:38–52.
Gabarino J, Benn JL. The ecology of childbearing and childrearing. In: Gabarino J, editor. Children and families in the social environments, 2nd ed. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1992:133–76.
Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997:179–205.
SPSS. SPSS® Base 8.0 for Windows user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, 1998.
Muhr T. ATLAS.ti user's manual and reference, 1st ed. Berlin: Scientific Software Development, 1997.
Krueger R. Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
Miles MB, Huberman AM.Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
Brown S, Eisenberg L, editors. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
Young CL, McMahon JE, Bowman VM, Thompson DS. Psychosocial concerns of women who delay prenatal care. Fam Soc J Contemp Hum Serv 1990;71:408–14.
Miller RS. The social construction and reconstruction of physiological events: Acquiring the pregnancy identity. Stud Symbolic Interaction 1978;1:181–204.
MacCormack CP. Ethnography of fertility and birth, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1994.
Bar-Tal Y, Spitzer A. The effect on coping of monitoring, blunting, and the ability to achieve cognitive structure. J Psychol 1999;133(4):395–412.
Bonanno GA, Davis PH, Singer JL, Schwartz GE. The repressor personality and avoidant information processing: A dichotic listening study. J Res Pers 1991;25:386–401.
Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 1978;19:2–21.
Chrisman NJ, Kleinman A. Popular health care, social networks and cultural meanings: The orientation of medical anthropology. In: Mechanic D, editor. Handbook of health, health care and the health professions. New York: Free Press, 1983:569–90.
Gerber E. Becoming unpregnant: French women's experience of RU486, abortion, and embodiment [dissertation]. University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 1999.
Scrimshaw SCM. Bringing the period down: Government and squatter settlement confront induced abortion in Ecuador. In: Pelto PJ, deWalt W, editors. Macro and micro levels of analysis in anthropology. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1985:121–44.
Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 1995.
Morgan DL. The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, 1998.
Jack B, Culpepper L. Preconception care. In: Merkatz IR, Thompson JE, editors. New perspectives on prenatal care. New York: Elsevier, 1990:69–88.
Pamuk E, Makuc D, Heck K, Reuben C, Lochner K. Socioeconomic status and health chartbook: Health United States–1998. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998.
Hughes DC, Runyan SJ. Prenatal care and public policy: Lessons for promoting women's health. J Am Med Wom Assoc 1995;50:156–9, 163.
Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
Sofaer S. Qualitative methods: What they are and why use them. Health Serv Res 1999;34(5, Part 2):1101–18.
Hurley RE. Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious. Health Serv Res 1999;34(5, Part 2):1119–36.
Campbell JD, Mitchell P, Stanford JB, Ewigman BG. Validating a model developed to predict prenatal care utilization. J Fam Pract 1995;41:457–64.
St. Clair PA, Smeriglio VL, Alexander CS, Celantano DD. Social network structure and prenatal care utilization. Med Care 1989;27:823–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peacock, N.R., Kelley, M.A., Carpenter, C. et al. Pregnancy Discovery and Acceptance Among Low-Income Primiparous Women: A Multicultural Exploration. Matern Child Health J 5, 109–118 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011301232549
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011301232549