Skip to main content
Log in

Pacemaker Repetitive Nonreentrant Ventriculoatrial Synchronous Rhythm. A Review

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ventriculoatrial (VA) synchrony during dual chamber pacing can occur in any patient who has the ability to sustain repeated retrograde conduction. If the retrograde P wave is sensed, the result will be an endless loop tachycardia or repetitive reentrant VA synchrony. VA synchrony can also occur when a dual chamber pacemaker does not sense a retrograde P wave within the postventricular atrial refractory period. In this situation if the normally suprathreshold atrial stimulus at the end of the atrial escape interval is continually delivered when the atrial myocardium is physiologically refractory, the result will be a repetitive nonreentrant VA synchronous rhythm. Repetitive nonreentrant VA synchrony may produce unfavorable hemodynamic consequences and the pacemaker syndrome. It represents an example of functional atrial undersensing combined with functional loss of atrial capture. Management requires modification of the programmed settings of the pacemaker and utilization of certain algorithms designed for other functions but nevertheless effective in this situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barold SS. Repetitive reentrant and nonreentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony in dual chamber pacing. Clin Cardiol1991;14:754-763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sudduth B, Goldschlager N. Retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction in atrial refractoriness. Cause of apparent failure of atrial capture. PACE1986;9:56-57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. VanGelder LM, El Gamal MIH. Ventriculoatrial conduction: a cause of atrial malpacing in AV universal pacemakers. A report of two cases. PACE1985;8:140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barold SS, Falkoff MD, Ong LS, et al. AV desynchronization arrhythmia during DDD pacing. In: Belhassen B, Feldman S, eds. Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Jerusalem: Keterpress Enterprises, 1987:177-184.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barold SS. Repetitive nonreentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony in dual chamber pacing. In: Santini M, Pistolese M, Alliegro A, eds. Progress in Clinical Pacing. Amsterdam: Experta Medica, 1990:451-471.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barold SS. Pacemaker induced repetitive ventriculoatrial synchrony: Initiation and termination by ventricular extrasystole. PACE1997;20:989-992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chien WW, Foster E, Phillips B, et al. Pacemaker syndrome in a patient with DDD pacemaker for long QT syndrome. PACE1991;14:1209-1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuüller H, Brandt J. The Pacemaker syndrome. Old and new causes. Clin Cardiol1991;14:336-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ausubel K, Gabry MD, Klementowicz PT, et al. Pacemaker-mediated endless loop tachycardia at rates below the upper rate limit. Am J Cardiol1988;61:465-467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barold SS, Falkoff MD, Ong LS, et al. Magnet-unresponsive pacemaker endless loop tachycardia. Am Heart J1988;116:726-732.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Calkins H, El-Atassi R, Leon A, et al. Effect of the atrioventricular relationship on atrial refractoriness in humans. PACE1992;15:771-778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Efremidis M, Sideris A, Prappa E, et al. Effect of atrial pressure increase on effective refractory period and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol1999;3:307-310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katsumoto K, Niibori T, Watanabe Y. Rate-dependent threshold changes during atrial pacing: clinical and experimental studies. PACE1990;13:1009-1019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Claudon O, Andronache M, Dodinot B, et al. ECG trickery in dual chamber pacing: What are the proper settings in case of sinus dysfunction associated with borderline AV conduction. Stimucoeur2000;28:81-85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ellenbogen KA, Gilligan DM, Wood MA, et al. The pacemaker syndrome-a matter of definition. Am J Cardiol1997;79:1226-1229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stierle U, Kruger D, Vincent AM, et al. An optimized AV delay algorithm for patients with intermittent atrioventricular conduction. PACE1998;21:1035-1043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui H, et al. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. PACE1996;19:1740-1747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Linde C. The clinical utility of positive and negative AV/PV hysteresis. In: Santini M, ed. Progress in Clinical Pacing. Armonk NY: Futura Media Services, 1997:339-345.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levine PA, Barold SS. Pacemaker automaticity: enabled by a multiplicity of new algorithms. In: Singer I, Barold SS, Camm AJ, eds. Nonpharmacologic Therapy of Arrhythmias for the 21st Century: The State of the Art. Armonk, NY: Futura, 1998:845-880.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barold, S.S., Levine, P.A. Pacemaker Repetitive Nonreentrant Ventriculoatrial Synchronous Rhythm. A Review. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 5, 45–58 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009853723766

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009853723766

Navigation