Abstract
This article examines the practice of "co-participant completion" in Japanese conversation, and explores what kinds of resources are mobilized to provide the opportunity to complete another participant's utterance-in-progress. It suggests the following observations as potential characteristics of Japanese co-participant completion: (i) Syntactically-defined two-part formats (e.g. [If X] + [then Y]) may not play as prominent a role as in English; (ii) The majority of cases of co-participant completion take the form of 'terminal item completion;' (iii) Locally emergent structures like 'contrast' and 'list' as well as 'unprojected' features of turn construction often play an important role in enhancing the opportunity for completing another participant's utterance-in-progress. The article then discusses the implications of these findings for the investigation of the mutual bearing of grammar and social interaction. In particular, the discussion focuses on what we can learn from the practice of co-participant completion about how projection of turn-shapes is accomplished in Japanese conversation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Falk, Jane. (1980). The conversational duet. Proceedings of the 6th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 507-514. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Ferrara, Kathleen. (1992). The interactive achievement of a sentence: Joint production in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes 15: 207-228.
Ford, Cecilia E. and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 134-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Barbara A., Hayashi, Makoto and Jasperson, Robert. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 97-121. New York: Irvington Publisher.
Goodwin, Charles. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50: 272-302.
Goodwin, Charles. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, Charles. (1989). Turn construction and conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe and E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars, pp. 88-102. Newbury: Sage.
Goodwin, Charles. (1995). Sentence construction within interaction. In U.M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication, pp. 198-219. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Goodwin, Charles. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interative organization of assessments. IPrA papers in pragmatics 1: 1-54.
Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 147-189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50: 303-317.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness and Goodwin, Charles. (1987). Children's arguing. Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, In S. Philips, S. Steele and C. Tanz, pp. 200-248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayashi, Makoto and Mori, Junko. (1998). Co-construction in Japanese revisited: We do “finish each other's sentences”. In N. Akaatsuka and S. Iwasaki (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 7, pp. 77-93. Stanford: CSLI.
Lerner, Gene H. (1987). Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Construction and Social Action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
Lerner, Gene H. (1991). On the syntax of sentence-in-progress. Language in Society 20: 441-458.
Lerner, Gene H. (1996a). On the "semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 238-276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene H. (1996b). Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 303-321.
Lerner, Gene H. and Takagi, Tomoyo. (1999). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 49-75.
Mizutani, Nobuko. (1993). Kyoowa kara taiwa e. Nihongogaku 12(4): 4-10.
Mori, Junko. (1996). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement: The Use of Connective Expressions in Japanese Conversations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.) (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi and Platt, Martha. (1979). Propositions across utterances. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental Pragmatics, pp. 251-268. New York: Academic Press.
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Thompson, Sandra A. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. Davis (Ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, pp. 213-271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse. In E. Hovy and D. Scott (Eds.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues-An Interdisciplinary Account, pp. 67-96. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Yoshida, Eri. (1996). A study of co-construction in Japanese: We don't “finish each other's sentences”. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki and S. Strauss (Eds.) Japanese/ Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, pp. 115-130. Stanford: CSLI.
Sacks, Harvey. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. 2 volumes. Edited by Gail Jefferson, with Introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Ochs, Elinor and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 1-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Susan and Kawanishi, Yumiko. (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki and S. Strauss (Eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, pp. 149-166. Stanford: CSLI.
Szatrowski, Polly. (1993). Nihongo no danwa no koozoo bunseki - Kanyuu no danwa no sutoratejii no koosatsu (Structure of Japanese conversation: Invitation strategies). Tokyo: Kuroshio. Szatrowski, Polly. (1996). When do Japanese speakers co-construct utterances? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Chicago, Illinois, March, 1996.
Tanaka, Hiroko. (1996). Language, Culture and Social Interaction: A Comparison of Turn Taking in Japanese and Anglo/American English. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
Tanaka, Hiroko. (forthcoming a). Turn-projection in Japanese and Anglo/American English talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
Tanaka, Hiroko. (forthcoming b). Turn-Taking in Japanese and Anglo/American English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayashi, M. Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation. Human Studies 22, 475–499 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060