Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Development

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tests the utility of a new sociocognitive frame for analysing the development of teachers' knowledge – the knowledge integration perspective (Linn, Eylon, & Davis, in press; Linn & Hsi, 2000). In doing so, the paper describes one prospective elementary teacher's developing knowledge and highlights its complexity. The prospective teacher demonstrates relatively well-integrated science subject matter knowledge, but she makes some problematic links to lessons and develops some instructional representations that show where she needs to distinguish between different scientific ideas. She also, however, links science concepts to appropriate real-world experiences, indicating that she has nascent useful pedagogical content knowledge. The paper discusses what teacher educators can learn about their learners from this analysis, argues for the utility of the knowledge integration perspective for conducting similar analyses, provides ideas to help science teacher educators apply the perspective easily as they teach their students, and points to areas ripe for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., Smith, D. C., & Peasley, K. (2000). Integrating learner and learning concerns: Prospective elementary science teachers' paths and progress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 547-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., & Lederman, N. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. <nt>(Eds.)</nt>. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K., & Jones, L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of pre-service science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, International handbook of science education (pp. 707-718). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (1998). Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Linn, M. C., & Clancy, M. J. (1995). Learning to use parentheses and quotes in LISP. Computer Science Education, 6(1), 15-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. <nt>(Eds.)</nt>. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. (1993). Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J., & Zeichner, K. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in pre-service teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2003, April). Pedagogy of teacher education. <nt>Paper presented at the</nt> American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Children's ideas in science (pp. 10-32). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. Van Zee <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 184-215). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Reynolds, D. (1999). Good readers, good teachers? Subject matter expertise as a challenge in learning to teach. Harvard Educational Review, 69(1), 29-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). (1992). Models standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Carter, G., & Rua, M. J. (1999). Children's concepts: Tools for transform-ing science teachers' knowledge. Science Education, 83, 545-557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2003). Case studies of teacher development: An in-depth look at how thinking about pedagogy develops over time. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, Winter, 14-17, 50-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. <nt>(Eds.). (in press)</nt>. Internet environments for science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (1996, July). Lifelong science learning: A longitudinal case study. <nt>Paper presented at the</nt> Cognitive Science Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Linn, M. C., Eylon, B.-S., & Davis, E. A. <nt>(in press)</nt>. The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Internet environments for science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, and peers: Science learning partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Beyond fourth-grade science: Why do US and Japanese students diverge? Educational Researcher, 29(3), 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1991). Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 885-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J., & Gunstone, R. (1997). Professional development in residence: Developing reflection on science teaching and learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(2), 159-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., & Harrington, H. L. <nt>(Eds.)</nt>. (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193-205). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merseth, K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 722-744). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. A. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: 1989 Yearbook, ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Detroit, MI: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (1987). NCATE standards, procedures, and policies for the accreditation of professional education units: The accreditation of professional education units for the preparation of professional school personnel at basic and advanced levels. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional teaching standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northfield, J. (1998). Teacher educators and the practice of science teacher education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, International handbook of science education (pp. 695-706). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petish, D. A., & Davis, E. A. (2001, March). Subject matter knowledge and goal preferences among preservice elementary science teachers. <nt>Paper presented at the</nt> National Association of Research on Science Teaching Conference, St. Louis, MO.

  • Putnam, R. T., Heaton, R. M., Prawat, R. S., & Remillard, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 213-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2000). Content and pedagogical content knowledge for elementary science teacher educators: Knowing our students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 27-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithey, J. (2003). Two perspectives on expertise in elementary science teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln <nt>(Eds.)</nt>, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D., & Harrison, A. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: An analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion.' International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1157-1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E., & Roberts, D. (2001). Using pedagogical inquiries as a basis for learning to teach: Prospective teachers' reflections upon positive science learning experiences. Science Education, 85, 733-757.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1993). Intermediate causal models: A missing link for science education? In R. Glaser <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 177-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad <nt>(Ed.)</nt>, Review of research in education (pp. 173-209). Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318-339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Michigan, USA

    Elizabeth A. Davis

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, E.A. Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Development. Research in Science Education 34, 21–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8

Search

Navigation