Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between soil bulk electrical conductivity and the principal component analysis of topography and soil fertility values

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measures of soil electrical conductivity (EC) and elevation are relatively inexpensive to collect and result in dense data sets which allow for mapping with limited interpolation. Conversely, soil fertility information is expensive to collect so that relatively few samples are taken and mapping requires extensive interpolation with large estimation errors, resulting in limited usefulness for site-specific applications in precision agriculture. Principal component (PC) analysis and cokriging can be applied to create meaningful field scale summaries of groups of attributes and to decrease the estimation error of maps of the summarized attributes. Deep (0–90 cm) and shallow (0–30 cm) EC, elevation, and soil fertility attributes were measured in fields under corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotations, at two sites in Illinois (IL) and two sites in Missouri (MO). Soil fertility and topography attributes were summarized by PC analysis. The first topography PC (TopoPC1) contrasted flow accumulation against elevation and curvature, to describe the main topographic pattern of the fields. The first soil fertility PC (SoilPC1) consistently grouped together cation exchange capacity (CEC), Ca, Mg, and organic matter (OM). SoilPC1 was well correlated to soil EC for all sites and cokriging with EC had higher r 2 in the crossvariogram models compared to ordinary kriging. The second and third soil fertility PCs (SoilPC2 and SoilPC3) were concerned with soil pH and P, and reflected historic land use patterns. Maps of SoilPC2 and SoilPC3 had little relationship to soil EC or topography and so could not be improved by cokriging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckett P H T and Webster R 1971 Soil variability: A review. Soils Fert. 34, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock D S and Bullock D G 2000 From agronomic research to farm management guidelines: A primer on the economics of information and precision technology. Prec. Agric. 2, 71–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock D G, Bullock D S, Nafziger E D, Doerge T A, Paszkiewicz S R, Carter P R and Peterson T A 1998 Does variable rate seeding of corn pay? Agron. J. 90, 830–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P A and Webster R 1976 Improving a reconnaissance soil classification by multivariate methods. J. Soil Sc. 27, 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch C V and Journel A G 1998 GSLIB, Geostatistical software library and users guide, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P 1997 Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P 1998 Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R J 2001 A primer of multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes D B 1996 Improved soil mapping using electromagnetic induction surveys. In Precision agriculture. Proc. third int. conf. on precision agriculture, Minneapolis, MN. pp. 169–179.

  • Johnson C K, Doran J W, Duke H R, Wienhold B J, Eskridge K M and Shanahan J F 2001 Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1829–1837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R A and Wichern D W 1998 Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 4th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe I T 1986 Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattree R and Naik D N 2000 Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen N R, Sudduth K A and Drummond S T 1999 Soil electrical conductivity as a crop productivity measure for claypan soils. J. Prod. Agric. 12, 607–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko A N and Bullock D G 1999 A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron. J. 91, 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko A N and Bullock D G 2000 Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron. J. 92, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko A N, Boast C W and Bullock D G 1999 Multifractal analysis of soil spatial variability. Agron. J. 91, 1033–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddonni G A, Urricariet S, Ghersa C M and Lavado R S 1999 Assessing soil quality in the rolling pampa, using soil properties and maize characteristics. Agron. J. 91, 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallarino A P, Oyarzabal E S and Hinz P N 1999 Interpreting within-field relationships between crop yields and soil and plant variables using factor analysis. Precision Agric. 1, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo D D and Worcester B K 1975 Soil fertility and crop responses at selected landscape positions. Agron. J. 67, 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugteren W A, Malo D D, Schumacher T E, Schumacher J A, Carlson C G, Clay D E, Clay S A, Dalsted K J and Ellsbury M M 2000 Hillslope chronosequence of electromagnetic induction readings as influenced by selected soil properties. Agron. Abstr. 82 pp.

  • Omonode R A 2001 Soil spatial variability: structures, models, and their effects on crop yield variability in central Illinois. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Parkin T B and Robinson J A 1992 Analysis of lognormal data. Adv. Soil Sci. 20, 193–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozdnyakova L and Zhang R 1999 Geostatistical analyses of soil salinity in a large field. Precision Agric. 1, 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R J 2001 A Primer of Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 2000 SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth K A, Drummond S T, Birrell S J and Kitchen N R 1996 Analysis of spatial factors influencing crop yield. In Proc. 3rd int. conf. on precision agric. ASA, CSSA, SSSA. Madison, WI. pp. 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth K A, Kitchen N R and Drummond S T 1999 Soil conductivity sensing on claypan soils: Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct methods. In Proc. 4rd int. conf. on precision agric. ASA, CSSA, SSSA. St Paul, MN. pp. 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis J I, Odeh O A and McBratney A B 2001 Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 869–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wander M M and Bollero G A 1999 Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in Illinois. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 691–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick A W, Vargas-Guzman J A, Mayer S, Restrepo M and Ellsworth T R 1999 Strategies for improving spatial variability assessments. In Assessment of non-point source pollution in the vadose zone. Geophysical Monogr. 108, 93–105.

  • Windhorn R D 1998 Soil Survey of McLean County, Illinois. Illinois Agric. Experimental Stn. Soil Rep. 159.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Officer, S., Kravchenko, A., Bollero, G. et al. Relationships between soil bulk electrical conductivity and the principal component analysis of topography and soil fertility values. Plant and Soil 258, 269–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016557.94937.ed

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016557.94937.ed

Navigation