Abstract
To participate in the potential market for carbon credits based on changes in the use and management of the land, one needs to identify opportunities and implement land-use based emissions reductions or sequestration projects. A key requirement of land-based carbon (C) projects is that any activity developed for generating C benefits must be additional to business-as-usual. A rule-based model was developed and used that estimates changes in land-use and subsequent carbon emissions over the next twenty years using the Eastern Panama Canal Watershed (EPCW) as a case study. These projections of changes in C stocks serve as a baseline to identify where opportunities exist for implementing projects to generate potential C credits and to position Panama to be able to participate in the emerging C market by developing a baseline under scenarios of business-as-usual and new-road development. The projections show that the highest percent change in land use for the new-road scenario compared to the business-as-usual scenario is for urban areas, and the greatest cause of C emission is from deforestation. Thus, the most effective way to reduce C emissions to the atmosphere in the EPCW is by reducing deforestation. In addition to affecting C emissions, reducing deforestation would also protect the soil and water resources of the EPCW. Yet, under the current framework of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), only credits arising from reforestation are allowed, which after 20 years of plantation establishment are not enough to offset the C emissions from the ongoing, albeit small, rate of deforestation in the EPCW. The study demonstrates the value of spatial regional projections of changes in land cover and C stocks: •The approach helps a country identify its potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission liabilities into the future and provides opportunity for the country to plan alternative development pathways. •It could be used by potential project developers to identify which types of projects will generate the largest C benefits and provide the needed baseline against which a project is then evaluated. •Spatial baselines, such as those presented here, can be used by governments to help identify development goals. •The development of such a baseline, and its expansion to other vulnerable areas, well positions Panama to respond to the future market demand for C offsets. •It is useful to compare the projected change in land cover under the business-as-usual scenario to the goals set by Law 21 for the year 2020. Suggested next steps for analysis includeusing the modeling approach to exploreland-use, C dynamics and management ofsecondary forests and plantations, soilC gains or losses, sources ofvariability in the land use and Cstock projections, and other ecologicalimplications and feedbacks resulting fromprojected changes in land cover.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloomfield, J., Ratchford, M. and Brown, S. (eds.): 2000, ‘Special edition on land-use change and forestry and the Kyoto Protocol’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change 5, 1–121.
Brown, S.: 1997, Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change of Tropical Forests: Primer, FAO Forestry Paper 134, Rome, Italy.
Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E.: 1990, ‘Changes in C and nitrogen content of tropical soils from forest clearing and succession in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands’, Plant and Soil 124, 53–64.
Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E.: 1992, ‘Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon’, Interciencia 17, 8–18.
Brown, S., Schroeder, P. and Birdsey, R.: 1997, ‘Aboveground biomass distribution of US Eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development’, Forest Ecology and Management 96, 37–47.
Brown, S., Burnham, M., Delaney, M., Vaca, R., Powell, M. and Moreno, A.: 2000a, ‘Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: a case study of the Noel Kempff Climate Action Project in Bolivia’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change 5, 99–121.
Brown, S., Masera, O. and Sathaye, J.: 2000b, ‘Project-based activities’, in R. Watson, I. Noble and D. Verardo (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry; Special Report to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–338.
Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H. and Baumgardner, G.A.: 1997, ‘Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests’, Oecologia 111, 1–11.
Condit, R., Watts, K., Bohlman, S.A., Pérez, R., Hubbel, S.P. and Foster, R.B.: 2000, ‘Quantifying the deciduousness of tropical forest canopies under varying climates’, Journal of Vegetation Science 11, 649–658.
Condit, R., Robinson, W.D., Ibanez, R., Aguilar, S., Sanjur, A., Martinez, R., Stallard, R.F., Garcia, T., Angehr, G.R., Petit, L., Wright, S.J., Robinson, T.R. and Heckadon, S.: 2001, ‘The status of the Panama Canal Watershed and its biodiversity at the beginning of the 21st Century’, BioScience 51, 389–398.
Delaney, M., Brown, S., Lugo, A.E., Torres-Lezama, A. and Bello Quintero, N.: 1998, ‘The quantity and turnover of dead wood in permanent forest plots in six life zones of Venezuela’, Biotropica 30, 2–11.
Detwiler, R.P.: 1986, ‘Land use change and the global carbon cycle: the role of tropical soils’, Biogeochemistry 2, 67–93.
Gitay, H., Brown, S., Easterling, W. and Jallow, B.: 2001. ‘Ecosystems and their services’, in J. McCarthy, O. Canziani, N. Leary and D. Dokken (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–342.
Gonzalez, F.M.: 2000, Comparación de la Capacidad de Fijación de Dióxido de Carbono en los Bosques de los Parques Nacionales Soberanía, Chagres y Camino de Cruces, Tesis de Maestro en Ciencias Ambientales, Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Ambientales Opción: Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de Panamá, República de Panamá.
Heckadon-Moreno, S., Ibáñez, R. and Condit, R. (eds.): 1999, La Cuenca del Canal: Deforestación, Contaminación, y Urbanización, Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, Balboa, Panama.
Holdridge, L.R.: 1967, Life Zone Ecology, rev. ed. San Jose, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.
Karnosky, D.F.: 2003. ‘Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 on forest trees and forest ecosystems: knowledge gaps’, Environment International 29, 161–169.
King, A.W., Post, W.M. and Wullschleger. S.D.: 1997, ‘The potential response of terrestrial carbon storage to changes in climate and atmospheric CO2’, Climatic Change 35, 199–227.
Kraenzel, M., Castillo, A., Moore, T. and Potvin, C.: 2003, ‘Carbon storage of harvest-age teak (Tectona grandis) plantations, Panama’, Forest Ecology and Management 173, 213–225.
Lugo, A.E., Gillespie, A.J., Brown, S. and Chapman, J.: 1997, ‘Caracteristicas de plantactiones arboreas en los tropicos’, in A.E. Lugo (ed.), Rendimiento y aspectos silviculturales de plantaciones maderas en America Latina, Serie Forestal No. 9, FAO/US Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico, pp. 1–62.
Lugo, A.E. and Brown, S.: 1993, ‘Management of tropical soils as sinks of atmospheric carbon’, Plant and Soil 149, 27–41.
Moura Costa, P., Stuart, M., Pinard, M. and Phillips, G.: 2000, ‘Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projects’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 39–50.
Panama Canal Watershed Monitoring Project (STRI - ANAM - USAID): 1999, Panama City, Panama.
Prieto, C., González, B., Ortega, G., Monteza, E., González, F. and Sanjur, A.: 1999, ‘Canal Watershed Monitoring Project: Human Population Component’, Panama Canal Watershed Monitoring Project (STRI - ANAM - USAID), Panama City, Panama.
Tarté, R.: 1999, Panama Canal Watershed Climate Action/Conservation Project, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia.
Winjum, J.K., Brown, S. and Schlamadinger, B.: 1998, ‘Forest harvests and wood products: Sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide’, Forest Science 44, 272–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dale, V.H., Brown, S., Calderón, M.O. et al. Estimating baseline carbon emissions for the Eastern Panama Canal watershed. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 8, 323–348 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000005613.85127.3f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000005613.85127.3f