Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative Electrode Burns

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives.The purpose of this paper is to increase awareness of electrode burns that occur in the operating room (OR), to discuss their causes, warning signs, and methods that may reduce their occurrence. Two general sources of electrical burns are described: 1) Excessive radio-frequency current density usually originating from a monopolar electrosurgical unit (ESU) and 2) Direct current (DC) originating from a battery or equipment malfunction. Methods.Case examples associated with intraoperative neuromonitoring are provided and discussed in the context of the relevant literature. Seven cases are described, five associated with excessive radio-frequency current density and two associated with direct current originating from a battery or equipment malfunction. Conclusions.Recommendations on prevention and warning signs associated with these burns are presented in addition to procedures to follow if a burn is suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bovie WT, Cushing H. Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors with a preliminary note on a new surgical-current generator. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1928; 47: 751-784

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vilos G, Latendresse K, Siang Gan B. Electophysical properties of electrosurgery and capacitive induced current. AmJ Surg 2001; 182: 222-225

    Google Scholar 

  3. Uyttendaele K, Grobstein S, Svetz P. Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: What does it mean? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1978; 29: 317-330

    Google Scholar 

  4. Health Devices. Risk of electrosurgical burns at needle electrode sites. 1994; 23: 373-374

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith TL, Smith JM. Electrosurgery in otolaryngologyhead and neck surgery: Principles, advances and complications. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 769-780

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stouffer DJ. Fires during surgery: Two fatal incidents in Los Angeles. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 114-117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg SN, Solbati L, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS. Variables a¡ecting proper system grounding for radiofrequency ablation in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11: 1069-1075

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce JA, Geddes LA, Van Vleet JF et al. Skin burns from electrosurgical current. Med Instrum 1983; 17: 225-231

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tan KS, Hinberg I. Temperature distribution beneath pediatric electrosurgical dispersive electrodes: A model study. Biomed InstrumTechnol 1993; 27: 506-513

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edrich J, Cookson CC. Electrosurgical dispersive electrodes heat cutaneous and subcutaneous skin layers. Med Instrum 1987; 21: 81-86

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vancaillie TG. Active electrode monitoring. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1009-1012

    Google Scholar 

  12. DeRosa JF, Gadsby PD. Radio-frequency heating under ECG electrodes. Med Instrum 1979; 13: 273-276

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orpin JA. Unexpected burns under skin electrodes. CMAJ 1982; 127: 1106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leeming MN, Ray C, Howland WS. Low-voltage, direct-current burns. JAMA 1970; 14: 1681-1684

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgman CD, Weast RC, Selby SM. Tables for identification of organic compounds; supplement to Handbook of chemistry and physics. Compiled by Max Frankel [and others]. Cleveland: Chemical Rubber Pub. Co, 1960: vii 241

    Google Scholar 

  16. Balmeseda MT, Fatehi MT Koozekanami SH et al. Burns in functional electric stimulation: two case reports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 452-453

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haenggeli A, Richter M, Lehmann W, Dulguerov P. A complication of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: Facial skin burns. AmJ Otol 1999; 20: 679-682

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper JB, DeCesare R, D'Ambra MN. An engineering critical incident: Direct current burn from neuromuscular stimulator. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 168-172

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baker GL, Mani MM. Infant monitoring resulting in burns-tissue damage: Literature review and case report. J Burn Care Rehab 1993; 14: 113-119

    Google Scholar 

  20. Irnich W. How to avoid surface burns during electrosurgery. Med Instrum 1986; 20: 320-326

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leibler GE. Ground versus earth, there is a difference. J Forensic Sci 1984; 29: 550-556

    Google Scholar 

  22. Health Devices. Investigating device-related burns. 1993; 22: 334-352

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee TW, Chen TM, Cheng TY et al. Skin injury in the operating room. Injury 1998; 29: 345-347

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, M.J., Gaetz, M. Intraoperative Electrode Burns. J Clin Monit Comput 18, 25–32 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000025254.73456.db

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000025254.73456.db

Navigation