Abstract
Objectives.The purpose of this paper is to increase awareness of electrode burns that occur in the operating room (OR), to discuss their causes, warning signs, and methods that may reduce their occurrence. Two general sources of electrical burns are described: 1) Excessive radio-frequency current density usually originating from a monopolar electrosurgical unit (ESU) and 2) Direct current (DC) originating from a battery or equipment malfunction. Methods.Case examples associated with intraoperative neuromonitoring are provided and discussed in the context of the relevant literature. Seven cases are described, five associated with excessive radio-frequency current density and two associated with direct current originating from a battery or equipment malfunction. Conclusions.Recommendations on prevention and warning signs associated with these burns are presented in addition to procedures to follow if a burn is suspected.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bovie WT, Cushing H. Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors with a preliminary note on a new surgical-current generator. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1928; 47: 751-784
Vilos G, Latendresse K, Siang Gan B. Electophysical properties of electrosurgery and capacitive induced current. AmJ Surg 2001; 182: 222-225
Uyttendaele K, Grobstein S, Svetz P. Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: What does it mean? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1978; 29: 317-330
Health Devices. Risk of electrosurgical burns at needle electrode sites. 1994; 23: 373-374
Smith TL, Smith JM. Electrosurgery in otolaryngologyhead and neck surgery: Principles, advances and complications. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 769-780
Stouffer DJ. Fires during surgery: Two fatal incidents in Los Angeles. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 114-117
Goldberg SN, Solbati L, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS. Variables a¡ecting proper system grounding for radiofrequency ablation in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11: 1069-1075
Pearce JA, Geddes LA, Van Vleet JF et al. Skin burns from electrosurgical current. Med Instrum 1983; 17: 225-231
Tan KS, Hinberg I. Temperature distribution beneath pediatric electrosurgical dispersive electrodes: A model study. Biomed InstrumTechnol 1993; 27: 506-513
Edrich J, Cookson CC. Electrosurgical dispersive electrodes heat cutaneous and subcutaneous skin layers. Med Instrum 1987; 21: 81-86
Vancaillie TG. Active electrode monitoring. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1009-1012
DeRosa JF, Gadsby PD. Radio-frequency heating under ECG electrodes. Med Instrum 1979; 13: 273-276
Orpin JA. Unexpected burns under skin electrodes. CMAJ 1982; 127: 1106
Leeming MN, Ray C, Howland WS. Low-voltage, direct-current burns. JAMA 1970; 14: 1681-1684
Hodgman CD, Weast RC, Selby SM. Tables for identification of organic compounds; supplement to Handbook of chemistry and physics. Compiled by Max Frankel [and others]. Cleveland: Chemical Rubber Pub. Co, 1960: vii 241
Balmeseda MT, Fatehi MT Koozekanami SH et al. Burns in functional electric stimulation: two case reports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 452-453
Haenggeli A, Richter M, Lehmann W, Dulguerov P. A complication of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: Facial skin burns. AmJ Otol 1999; 20: 679-682
Cooper JB, DeCesare R, D'Ambra MN. An engineering critical incident: Direct current burn from neuromuscular stimulator. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 168-172
Baker GL, Mani MM. Infant monitoring resulting in burns-tissue damage: Literature review and case report. J Burn Care Rehab 1993; 14: 113-119
Irnich W. How to avoid surface burns during electrosurgery. Med Instrum 1986; 20: 320-326
Leibler GE. Ground versus earth, there is a difference. J Forensic Sci 1984; 29: 550-556
Health Devices. Investigating device-related burns. 1993; 22: 334-352
Lee TW, Chen TM, Cheng TY et al. Skin injury in the operating room. Injury 1998; 29: 345-347
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, M.J., Gaetz, M. Intraoperative Electrode Burns. J Clin Monit Comput 18, 25–32 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000025254.73456.db
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000025254.73456.db