Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of the Current Distribution in Aluminum Anodization

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of porous anodic Al2O3 films, formed potentiostatically in continuously stirred 15 wt.% H2SO4 electrolyte was studied as a function of the anodization voltage (14–18 V), bath temperature (15–25 °C) and anodization time (15–35 min). The variation of the anodic surface overpotential with the current density was measured experimentally. The film thickness at the more accessible portions of the anode was observed to increase with the anodization voltage and the bath temperature. However, the film thickness on the less accessible portions of the anode did not significantly change with the voltage or the bath temperature. This indicates that the anodization process at the more accessible regions is more strongly influenced by the surface processes than by the electric migration within the electrolyte. Furthermore, analysis confirms that the major portion of the film resistivity resides within a thin sub-layer that does not vary with the anodization time, and the growing anodic layer contributes only marginally to the overall film resistance. Computer aided design software was employed to simulate the current density distribution. For the range of process parameters studied, the electrochemical CAD software predicts accurately the measured thickness distribution along the anode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Keller, M.S. Hunter and D.L. Robinson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 100 (1953) 411.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Patermarakis and K. Moussoutzanis, Electrochim. Acta 40(6) (1995) 699.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Patermarakis, P. Lenas, Ch. Karavassilis and G. Papayiannis, Electrochim. Acta 36(3/4) (1991) 709.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Patermarakis and K. Moussoutzanis, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142(3) (1995) 737.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Patermarakis and D. Tzouvelekis, Electrochim. Acta 39(16) (1994) 2419.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Ono and N.Masuko, Surf. Coatings Technol. 169-170 (2003) 139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Albella, I. Montero, O. Sanchez and J.M. Martinez-Duart, J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 (1986) 876.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.C. Jimenez, J.M. Albella, I. Montero and J.M. Martinez-Duart, Electrochim. Acta 34(7) (1989) 951.

    Google Scholar 

  9. General Motors Engineering Standards GM9535P, March 1989.

  10. L. Young, Anodic Oxide Films (Academic Press, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Landau, R.E. White and J. Newman (eds.), in Proceedings of the D.N. Bennion Mem. Symp., (The Electrochemical Society Proceedings 94-9, 1994).

  12. J.S. Newman, Electrochemical Systems (Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. ''CELL DESIGN'', Computer Aided Design Software for Electrochemical Cells, L-Chem Inc., Shaker Heights, OH 44120.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akolkar, R., Landau, U., Kuo, H. et al. Modeling of the Current Distribution in Aluminum Anodization. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 34, 807–813 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACH.0000035611.87036.36

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACH.0000035611.87036.36

Navigation