Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Innovative Partnerships: Creating a Change Model for Academic and Student Affairs Collaboration

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the results from a national survey examining a recent innovation in higher education partnerships between academic and student affairs. The focus was on what change process can best assist institutions in moving to this model, which helps increase student learning on campus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American College Personnel Association. (1999). Higher education trends for the next century: A research agenda for student success. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloland, P. A., Stamatakos, L. C.,& Rogers, R. R., (1994). Reform in student affairs: A critique of student development. ERIC Counseling&Student Services Clearinghouse. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloland, P. A., Stamatakos, L. C.,& Rogers, R. R., (1996). Redirecting the role of student affairs to focus on student learning. Journal of College Student Development 37, 217-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman,& Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, P.L.,& Worth, R. (1997). The four levers of corporate change. New York, NY: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnall, C.A. (1995). Managing change in organizations (2nd edition). London, England: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1996). Choice, chance,&organizational change: Practical insights from evolution for business leaders&thinkers. New York, NY: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., Hard, K.,& Trahant, W. (1996). Managing the change process: A field book for change agents, consultants, team leaders, and reengineering managers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A.,& Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickmann, P. E. (1989). A systematic approach to fostering an academic and student affairs interface. NASPA Journal, 26, 40-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.S. (1982). Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskin, A. E. (1996). Facing the future: The change process in restructuring universities. Change, 28(4), 27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P.& Glick, W.H. (1993). Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1995). Creating campus partnerships for student success. College&University, 71(2), 2-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st Century: Recent research and conceptualizations., #No. 28-4. Washington, DC: ASHEERIC Higher Education Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A.,& Eckel, P. (2002a). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, inter-related strategies and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43, 295-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A.,& Eckel, P. (2002b). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or cultural responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 435-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., Hirsch, D.,& Burack, K. (Eds.). (2002c). Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment. New Directions for Higher Education, #116. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knefelkamp, L. L. (1991). The seamless curriculum. CIC Deans Institute: Is this good for our students? Washington, DC: Council for Independent Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P.,& Ramin Gyurmek, J. (1994). Student learning outside the classroom: Transcending artificial boundaries. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 8.Washington, DC: The GeorgeWashington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarid, L. (1999). Putting Descartes before the horse: Opportunities for advancing the student affairs link with academic affairs. College Student Affairs Journal, 19(1), 24-34

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A.,& Merry, U. (1986). Organizational transformation: Approaches, strategies, theories. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, P. G.,& Love, A. G. (1995). Enhancing student learning: Intellectual, social, and emotional integration. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.,& Murphy, S. (2000). Building a better bridge: Creating effective partnerships between academic and student affairs. Washington: NASPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA). (1997). Principles of good practice for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.,& Terenzini, P (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C. S.,& Hurst, J. C. (1996). Designing learning environments that integrate curricular and cocurricular experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 174-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirich, L. (1983). Organizations as shared meanings. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan,& T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. (pp. 56-83). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrianna Kezar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kezar, A. Enhancing Innovative Partnerships: Creating a Change Model for Academic and Student Affairs Collaboration. Innovative Higher Education 28, 137–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006289.31227.25

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006289.31227.25

Navigation