Abstract
This study presents the results from a national survey examining a recent innovation in higher education partnerships between academic and student affairs. The focus was on what change process can best assist institutions in moving to this model, which helps increase student learning on campus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. Washington, DC: Author.
American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
American College Personnel Association. (1999). Higher education trends for the next century: A research agenda for student success. Washington, DC: Author.
Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Bloland, P. A., Stamatakos, L. C.,& Rogers, R. R., (1994). Reform in student affairs: A critique of student development. ERIC Counseling&Student Services Clearinghouse. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina, School of Education.
Bloland, P. A., Stamatakos, L. C.,& Rogers, R. R., (1996). Redirecting the role of student affairs to focus on student learning. Journal of College Student Development 37, 217-226.
Bolman,& Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Brill, P.L.,& Worth, R. (1997). The four levers of corporate change. New York, NY: American Management Association.
Carnall, C.A. (1995). Managing change in organizations (2nd edition). London, England: Prentice Hall.
Carr, C. (1996). Choice, chance,&organizational change: Practical insights from evolution for business leaders&thinkers. New York, NY: Amacom.
Carr, D., Hard, K.,& Trahant, W. (1996). Managing the change process: A field book for change agents, consultants, team leaders, and reengineering managers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Chickering, A.,& Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Eickmann, P. E. (1989). A systematic approach to fostering an academic and student affairs interface. NASPA Journal, 26, 40-44.
Goodman, P.S. (1982). Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Guskin, A. E. (1996). Facing the future: The change process in restructuring universities. Change, 28(4), 27-37.
Huber, G.P.& Glick, W.H. (1993). Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hyman, R. (1995). Creating campus partnerships for student success. College&University, 71(2), 2-8.
Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st Century: Recent research and conceptualizations., #No. 28-4. Washington, DC: ASHEERIC Higher Education Reports.
Kezar, A.,& Eckel, P. (2002a). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, inter-related strategies and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43, 295-328.
Kezar, A.,& Eckel, P. (2002b). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or cultural responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 435-460.
Kezar, A., Hirsch, D.,& Burack, K. (Eds.). (2002c). Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment. New Directions for Higher Education, #116. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Knefelkamp, L. L. (1991). The seamless curriculum. CIC Deans Institute: Is this good for our students? Washington, DC: Council for Independent Colleges.
Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P.,& Ramin Gyurmek, J. (1994). Student learning outside the classroom: Transcending artificial boundaries. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 8.Washington, DC: The GeorgeWashington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135-148.
Lamarid, L. (1999). Putting Descartes before the horse: Opportunities for advancing the student affairs link with academic affairs. College Student Affairs Journal, 19(1), 24-34
Levy, A.,& Merry, U. (1986). Organizational transformation: Approaches, strategies, theories. New York, NY: Praeger.
Love, P. G.,& Love, A. G. (1995). Enhancing student learning: Intellectual, social, and emotional integration. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Martin, J.,& Murphy, S. (2000). Building a better bridge: Creating effective partnerships between academic and student affairs. Washington: NASPA.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.
National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA). (1997). Principles of good practice for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
Pascarella, E.,& Terenzini, P (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Schroeder, C. S.,& Hurst, J. C. (1996). Designing learning environments that integrate curricular and cocurricular experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 174-181.
Smirich, L. (1983). Organizations as shared meanings. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan,& T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. (pp. 56-83). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kezar, A. Enhancing Innovative Partnerships: Creating a Change Model for Academic and Student Affairs Collaboration. Innovative Higher Education 28, 137–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006289.31227.25
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006289.31227.25