Abstract
There are various ``classical'' argumentsagainst abduction as a logic of discovery,especially that (1) abduction is too weak amode of inference to be of any use, and (2) inbasic formulation of abduction the hypothesisis already presupposed to be known, so it isnot the way hypotheses are discovered in thefirst place. In this paper I argue, bybringing forth the idea of strategies,that these counter-arguments are weaker thanmay appear. The concept of strategiessuggests, inter alia, that many inferentialmoves are taken into account at the same time.This is especially important in abductivereasoning, which is basically a very weak modeof inference. The importance of strategicthinking can already be seen in Charles S.Peirce's early treatments of the topic, and N.R.Hanson's later writings on abductionalthough they did not use the concept of``strategies.'' On the whole, I am arguing thatthe focus should be more on methodologicalprocesses, and not only on validityconsiderations, which have dominated thediscussion about abduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achinstein, P.: 1970, Inference to Scientific Laws. In R.H. Stuwer (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5, 87–111.
Achinstein, P.: 1971, Law and Explanation. An Essay in The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Achinstein, P.: 1987, Scientific Discovery andMaxwell's Kinetic Theory, Philosophy of Science 54: 409–434.
Aliseda, A.: 1997, Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation. Dissertation Series, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aliseda, A.: 2001, A Place for Logic in ScientificMethodology:A Second Opportunity? A paper presented at the Model-Based Reasoning: Scientific Discovery, Technological Innovation, ValuesConference. Pavia, Italy, May 17–19.
Anderson, D.R.: 1987, Creativity and the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Barlow, N. (ed.): 1958, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, with original omissions restored. St James's Place, London: Collins.
Darwin, F.: 1892, Reminiscences of My Father's Everyday Life. In F. Darwin (ed.), Charles Darwin: His Life Told in an Autobiographical Chapter, and in a Selected Series of His Published Letters. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street 66–103.
Eco, U. and T.A. Sebeok (eds.): 1988, The Sign of Three. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. USA: Indiana University Press.
Fann, K.T.: 1970, Peirce's Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Frankfurt, H.G.: 1958, Peirce's Account of Inquiry. The Journal of Philosophy55(14): 588–592.
Gruber, H.E.: 1981, On the Relation Between 'Aha Experiences' and the Construction of Ideas, History of Science19: 41–59.
Hanson, N.R.: 1961, Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Hanson, N.R.: 1965, Notes Toward a Logic of Discovery. In R.J. Bernstein (ed.), Perspectives on Peirce. New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 42–65.
Hanson, N.R.: 1972, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: University Press, first printed 1958.
Hintikka, J.: 1985, True and False Logic of Scientific Discovery, Communication and Cognition18(1/2): 3–14.
Hintikka, J.: 1989, The Role of Logic in Argumentation,Monist72: 3–24.
Hintikka, J.: 1998, What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society34(3): 503–533.
Hintikka, J.: 1999, Is Logic the Key to All Good Reasoning? In J. Hintikka (ed.), Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, Volume 5. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoffmann, M.: 1999, Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction, Foundations of Science4: 271–305.
Jung, S.: 1996, The Logic of Discovery. An Interrogative Approach to Scientific Inquiry, American University Studies, Series V, Philosophy, Vol. 168. New York: Peter Lang.
Kapitan, T.: 1992, Peirce and the Autonomy of Abductive Reasoning, Erkenntnis37: 1–26.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laudan, L.: 1980, Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned. In T Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 173–183.
Liszka, J.J.: 1996, A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Magnani, L.: 1999. Model-Based Creative Abduction. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Nickles, T.: 1980a, Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science. In T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980b, Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Nickles, T.: 1989, Heuristical Appraisal: A Proposal, Social Epistemology3(3): 175–188.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1999a, Defending Abduction. Philosophy of Science66: S436–S451.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1999b, Abduction and Geometrical Analysis. Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Peirce, C., S. (CP): 1931-1958, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7-8, A.W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C., S. (HP): 1985, Historical Perspectives on Peirces Logic of Science. A History of Science, 2 vols., Carolyn Eisele (ed.). Berlin: Mouton Publishers.
Peirce, C., S. (EP2): 1992-1998, The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2 1893-1913, the Peirce Edition Project (ed.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Pera, M.: 1994, The Discourses of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, H.: 1938, Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Rescher, N.: 1995, Peirce on Abduction, Plausibility, and the Efficiency of Scientific Inquiry. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in the History of Philosophy. Avebury: Aldershot.
Schon, D.: 1959, Comment on Mr. Hanson's "The Logic of Discovery", The Journal of Philosophy56(11): 500–503.
Shelley, C.: 1996, Visual Abductive Reasoning in Archeology, Philosophy of Science63: 278–301.
Sintonen, M.: 1996, Structuralism and the Interrogative Model of Inquiry. In W. Balzer and C.U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Thagard, P.: 2000, Coherence in Thought and Action. A Bradford Book. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. and C. Shelley: 1997, Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence. In M.L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici and J. van Bentham (eds.), Logic and Scientific Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 413–427, on-line: http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Pages/%7FAbductive.html.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paavola, S. Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: the Importance of Strategies. Foundations of Science 9, 267–283 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042843.48932.25
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042843.48932.25