Abstract
There is a controversy about the biocompatibility of silicon nitride ceramics contained in the literature, which appears to be related to a factor of the individual chemical composition of different qualities of silicon nitride ceramics and of the different surface properties. This study attempts to investigate the cytotoxicity of different qualities of industrial silicon nitride ceramics applying an L929-cell culture model in a direct contact assay combined with a cell viability assessment. Five different qualities of industrial standard silicon nitride ceramics were chosen for in vitro testing. The chemical composition was determined by EDS analysis. Different biomedically approved aluminium oxide qualities, a titanium alloy, glass and polyvinylchloride (PVC) served as control materials. L929 mice fibroblasts were incubated directly on the materials for 24 h, stained with bisbenzimide and propidium iodine for double fluorochromasia viability testing, and evaluated by inversion-fluorescence microscopy to control cell morphology, viability and cell counts compared to empty well values. Scanning electron microscopy was applied to additionally investigate cell morphology. There was no observation of cytotoxic effects on the silicon nitride ceramic samples; moreover cell morphology remained the same as on aluminium oxide and titanium. Viability testing revealed the presence of avital cells exclusively on PVC, which served as a negative control. Cell counts on all polished surfaces showed significantly higher numbers, whereas some rough surface samples showed significantly lower numbers. We conclude that silicon nitride ceramics show no cytotoxic effects and should be considered for biomedical application owing to its favourable physiochemical properties, especially its superior resistance to mechanical stress, which would be useful for compression loaded conditions. Polished surfaces would appear to promote advanced biocompatibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. DION, L. BORDENAVE, F. LEFEBRE, R. BAREILLE, C. BAQUEY, J. R. MONIES and P. HAVLIK, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 5 (1994) 18.
P. GRISS, E. WERNER and J. HEIMKE, in "Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials" (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980) p. 217.
K. JAHNKE, D. PLESTER and G. HEIMKE, Biomaterials 4 (1983) 137.
G. HEIMKE and P. GRISS, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18 (1980) 503.
D. PLESTER and K. JAHNKE, Am. J. Otol 3 (1981) 104.
C. R. HOWLETT, E. MCCARTNEY and W. CHINO, Clin. Orthop. 244 (1989) 293.
S. J. NORTHUP, in "Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation. Scientific, Technical, and Clinical Testing of Implant Materials" (Macmillian Publishing Company, New York, 1988) p. 209.
S. A. ROSENBLUTH, G. R. WEDDINGTON, W. L. GUESS and J. AUTIAN, J. Phaim. Sci. 54 (1965) 156.
A. AMMAR A, Acta Neurochir. 72 (1984) 45.
A. DORAN, F. LAW, M. ALLEN and N. RUSHTON, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 751.
J. ELBEL, L. ECKERT, J. BLUM, E. WINTERMANTEL and H. EPPENBERGER, ibid. 21 (2000) 539.
H. KAWARA, Int. Dent. 33 (1983) 350.
P. MENGUCCI, G. MAJINI, A. DEBENEDITTIS and G. BIAGINI, Biomateiials 17 (1998) 1339.
A. NEUMANN and K. JAHNKE, Mat. Wiss Werkstofftech 34 (2003) 1052.
D. W. RICHERSON and P. M. STEPHAN, Mat. Sci. For. 47 (1989) 282.
M. AMARAL, M. A. LOPES, R. F. SILVA and J. SANTOS, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 857.
R. KUE, A. SOHRABI, D. NAGLE, C. FRONDOZA and D. HUNGERFORD, ibid. 20 (1999) 1195.
I. SVENSSON, E. ARTURSSON, P. LEANDERSON, R. BERGLIND and F. LINDGREN, Am. J. Ind. Med. 31 (1997) 335.
A. S. CHAWLA, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16 (1982) 501.
H. J. JOHNSON, S. J. NORTHUP, P. A. SEAGRAVES, P. J. GARVIN and R. F. WALLIN, ibid. 17 (1983) 571.
R. M. RICE, A. F. HEGYELI, S. J. GOURLAY, C. W. R. WADE, J. G. DILLON, H. JAFFE and R. K. KULKARNI, J. Biomed. Mazer. Res. 12 (1978) 43.
R. F. WALLIN and E. F. ARSCOTT, http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/98/04/013.htm1.
R. I. JOHNSSON and A. F. HEGYELI, Ann NYAcad Sci. 146 (1968) 66.
J. TAS and G. WESTERNENG, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29 (1981) 929.
S. A. LATT and G. STETTEN. ibid. 24 (1976) 24
H. A. CRISSMAN and J. A. STEINKAMP, Exper Cell Res. 173 (1987) 256.
A. SOHRABI, R. C. KUE, J. LIN, D. C. NAGLE, C. G. FRONDOZA and D. S. HUNGERFORD, in “Bioceramics”, Vol 11 (World Scientific Publishing, New York. 1998) p. 309.
R. E. WILSNACK, F. J. MEYER and J.G. SMITH, Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org. 1 (1973) 543.
U. GROSS, H. J. SCHMITZ, R. KINNE, F. R. FENDLER and V. STRUNZ in “Advances in Biomaterials 7: Biomaterials and Clinical Applications” (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987) p. 547.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neumann, A., Reske, T., Held, M. et al. Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 1135–1140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046396.14073.92
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046396.14073.92