Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a controversy about the biocompatibility of silicon nitride ceramics contained in the literature, which appears to be related to a factor of the individual chemical composition of different qualities of silicon nitride ceramics and of the different surface properties. This study attempts to investigate the cytotoxicity of different qualities of industrial silicon nitride ceramics applying an L929-cell culture model in a direct contact assay combined with a cell viability assessment. Five different qualities of industrial standard silicon nitride ceramics were chosen for in vitro testing. The chemical composition was determined by EDS analysis. Different biomedically approved aluminium oxide qualities, a titanium alloy, glass and polyvinylchloride (PVC) served as control materials. L929 mice fibroblasts were incubated directly on the materials for 24 h, stained with bisbenzimide and propidium iodine for double fluorochromasia viability testing, and evaluated by inversion-fluorescence microscopy to control cell morphology, viability and cell counts compared to empty well values. Scanning electron microscopy was applied to additionally investigate cell morphology. There was no observation of cytotoxic effects on the silicon nitride ceramic samples; moreover cell morphology remained the same as on aluminium oxide and titanium. Viability testing revealed the presence of avital cells exclusively on PVC, which served as a negative control. Cell counts on all polished surfaces showed significantly higher numbers, whereas some rough surface samples showed significantly lower numbers. We conclude that silicon nitride ceramics show no cytotoxic effects and should be considered for biomedical application owing to its favourable physiochemical properties, especially its superior resistance to mechanical stress, which would be useful for compression loaded conditions. Polished surfaces would appear to promote advanced biocompatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. DION, L. BORDENAVE, F. LEFEBRE, R. BAREILLE, C. BAQUEY, J. R. MONIES and P. HAVLIK, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 5 (1994) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. GRISS, E. WERNER and J. HEIMKE, in "Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials" (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980) p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. JAHNKE, D. PLESTER and G. HEIMKE, Biomaterials 4 (1983) 137.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. HEIMKE and P. GRISS, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18 (1980) 503.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. PLESTER and K. JAHNKE, Am. J. Otol 3 (1981) 104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. R. HOWLETT, E. MCCARTNEY and W. CHINO, Clin. Orthop. 244 (1989) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. J. NORTHUP, in "Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation. Scientific, Technical, and Clinical Testing of Implant Materials" (Macmillian Publishing Company, New York, 1988) p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. A. ROSENBLUTH, G. R. WEDDINGTON, W. L. GUESS and J. AUTIAN, J. Phaim. Sci. 54 (1965) 156.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. AMMAR A, Acta Neurochir. 72 (1984) 45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. DORAN, F. LAW, M. ALLEN and N. RUSHTON, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 751.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. ELBEL, L. ECKERT, J. BLUM, E. WINTERMANTEL and H. EPPENBERGER, ibid. 21 (2000) 539.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. KAWARA, Int. Dent. 33 (1983) 350.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. MENGUCCI, G. MAJINI, A. DEBENEDITTIS and G. BIAGINI, Biomateiials 17 (1998) 1339.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. NEUMANN and K. JAHNKE, Mat. Wiss Werkstofftech 34 (2003) 1052.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. W. RICHERSON and P. M. STEPHAN, Mat. Sci. For. 47 (1989) 282.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. AMARAL, M. A. LOPES, R. F. SILVA and J. SANTOS, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 857.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. KUE, A. SOHRABI, D. NAGLE, C. FRONDOZA and D. HUNGERFORD, ibid. 20 (1999) 1195.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. SVENSSON, E. ARTURSSON, P. LEANDERSON, R. BERGLIND and F. LINDGREN, Am. J. Ind. Med. 31 (1997) 335.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. CHAWLA, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16 (1982) 501.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. J. JOHNSON, S. J. NORTHUP, P. A. SEAGRAVES, P. J. GARVIN and R. F. WALLIN, ibid. 17 (1983) 571.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. M. RICE, A. F. HEGYELI, S. J. GOURLAY, C. W. R. WADE, J. G. DILLON, H. JAFFE and R. K. KULKARNI, J. Biomed. Mazer. Res. 12 (1978) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. F. WALLIN and E. F. ARSCOTT, http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/98/04/013.htm1.

  23. R. I. JOHNSSON and A. F. HEGYELI, Ann NYAcad Sci. 146 (1968) 66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. TAS and G. WESTERNENG, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29 (1981) 929.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. LATT and G. STETTEN. ibid. 24 (1976) 24

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. A. CRISSMAN and J. A. STEINKAMP, Exper Cell Res. 173 (1987) 256.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. SOHRABI, R. C. KUE, J. LIN, D. C. NAGLE, C. G. FRONDOZA and D. S. HUNGERFORD, in “Bioceramics”, Vol 11 (World Scientific Publishing, New York. 1998) p. 309.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. E. WILSNACK, F. J. MEYER and J.G. SMITH, Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org. 1 (1973) 543.

    Google Scholar 

  29. U. GROSS, H. J. SCHMITZ, R. KINNE, F. R. FENDLER and V. STRUNZ in “Advances in Biomaterials 7: Biomaterials and Clinical Applications” (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987) p. 547.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neumann, A., Reske, T., Held, M. et al. Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 1135–1140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046396.14073.92

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046396.14073.92

Keywords

Navigation