Abstract
Eco-labels in use today signify environmentally benign outcomes: "Choose this product, it is better for the environment than the average product." Another strategy would be to indicate negative outcomes with the purpose of trying to persuade consumers to avoid a product: "Do not choose this product, it is worse for the environment than the average product." In a computer-based experiment, it was investigated how these two types of labels affected preference for some everyday products. Individuals who had a weak or no interest in environmental issues were unaffected by either kind of label. Individuals with an intermediate interest in environmental issues were more affected by a negative label than by a positive label. Individuals with a strong interest in environmental protection were equally affected by the two kinds of labels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7, pp. 1–101. San Diego: Academic Press.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.
Chinnici, G., D'Amico, M., & Pecorino, B. (2002). A multivariate statistical analysis on the consumers of organic products. British Food Journal, 104, 187–199.
Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioural change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588–601.
Davies, A., Titterington, A. J., & Cochrane, C. (1995). Who buys organic food? A profile of purchasers of organic food in northern Ireland, British Food Journal, 97, 17–23.
European Union On-Line (2003). Council Directive 92/75/EEC (31992L0075) of 22 September 1992. Retrieved June 18, 2003, from http://www.europa.eu.int
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.
Fotopoulos, C., & Krystallis, A. (2002). Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: A countrywide survey. British Food Journal, 104, 730–765.
Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining pro-environmental intention and behaviour by personal norms and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–2528.
Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food perception and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104, 287–299.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In: E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles, pp. 133–168. New York: Guilford Press.
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286.
Higgins, E. T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of the psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 527–535.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Koivisto Hursti, U.-K., Åberg. L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2001). Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal, 103, 209–227.
Miles, S., & Frewer, L. Y. (2001). Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 47–61.
Nordlund, A., Garvill, J., & Marell, A. (2000). Motives for pro-environmental behavior. In: E. Hölzl (Ed.), Fairness & cooperation. Proceedings IAREP/SABE 2000, Vienna/Austria, pp. 309–313.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.
Palm, L., & Jarlbro, G. (1999). Nordiska konsumenter om Svanen-livsstil, kännedom, attityd och förtroende (Nordic consumers about the Swan-life style, knowledge, attitude and trust). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord 1999:592.
Saveenergy (2003). EU Energy Label. Retrieved June 17, 2003, from http://www.saveenergy.co.uk/whatto/choosing/label.cfm
Schwartz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 2, pp. 527–561. New York: Guilford.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.
Thøgersen, J. (1999). The ethical consumer. Moral norms and packaging choice. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 439–460.
Thøgersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 285–313.
Thøgersen, J. (2002). Promoting “green” consumer behavior with eco-labels. In: T. Dietz & P. C. Stern (Eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection, pp. 83–104. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Torjusen, H., Lieblein, G., Wandel, M., & Francis, C. A. (2001). Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark county, Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 207–216.
Tregear, A., Dent, J. B., & McGregor, M. J. (1994). The demand for organically grown produce. British Food Journal, 96, 21–25.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. In: D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames, pp. 143–158. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 539–560.
Wandel, M. (1994). Understanding consumer concern about food-related health risks. British Food Journal, 96, 35–40.
Wandel. M., & Bugge, A. (1997). Environmental concern in consumer evaluation of food quality. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 19–26.
Wegner, D. M., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In: D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 446–496. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wier, M., & Calverly, C. (2002). Market potential for organic foods in Europe. British Food Journal, 104, 45–62.
WWF:s recommendation on fish and the environment (2002). Second ed. Retrieved November 20, 2003, from http://konsumentverket.se.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grankvist, G., Dahlstrand, U. & Biel, A. The Impact of Environmental Labelling on Consumer Preference: Negative vs. Positive Labels. Journal of Consumer Policy 27, 213–230 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPO.0000028167.54739.94
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPO.0000028167.54739.94