Skip to main content
Log in

International Emission Trading and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation and Sequestration

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The deployment of carbon capture and sequestration (CC&S) technologies is greatly affected by the marginal cost of controlling carbon emissions (also the value of carbon, when emissions permits are traded). Both the severity and timing of emissions limitations and the degree to which emissions limitation obligations can be traded will affect the value of carbon and thereby the timing and magnitude of CC&S technology deployment. Emissions limits that are more stringent in the near term imply higher near-term carbon values and therefore encourage the local development and deployment of CC&S technologies.Trade in emissions obligations lowers the cost of meeting any regional or global emissions limit and so affects the rate of penetration of CC&S technologies. Trade lowers the marginal value of carbon and CC&S penetration in high cost regions and raises the marginal value of carbon and CC&S penetration in low cost regions. The net impact on the world CC&Stechnologies depends on whether their increased use in low-cost regions exceeds the reduced use in high-cost regions.In the long term, CC&S technologies must not only remove carbon but permanently sequester it. If reservoirs are not permanent, then the emissions and costs of control are merely displaced into the future. The paper presents quantitative estimates for the impacts of trade in emissions limitation obligations on the timing, magnitude, and geographic distribution of CC&S technologies and the marginal and total costs of carbon control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. M., Alig, R. J., McCarl, B. A., Callaway, J. M., and Winnett, S. M.: 1999, 'Minimum Cost Strategies for Sequestering Carbon in Forests', Land Economics 75(3), 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audus, H.: 2000, 'Leading Options for the Capture of CO2 at Power Stations', Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia, August 13-August 16 (2000).

  • Audus, H. and Dennish, T.: 2000, 'The Preliminary Assessment of Novel Power Generation Options Aimed at CO2 Abatement', Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia, August 13-August 16 (2000).

  • Cook, P. J., Rigg, A., and Bradshaw, J.: 2001, 'Putting it Back Where it Came From: Is Geologic Disposal of Carbon Dioxide an Option for Australia?', APPEA Journal 40 (1), 654–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J. J. and Edmonds, J. A.: 1998, 'Workshop for the Preliminary Identification of Basic Science Needs and Opportunities for the Safe and Economical Capture and Sequestration of CO2', in Benson, S., Chandler, W., Edmonds, J., Levine, M., Bates, L., Chum, H., Dooley, J., Grether, D., Houghton, J., Logan, J., Wiltsee, G., and Wright, L. (eds.), Carbon Management: Assessment of Fundamental Research Needs, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, D.C., August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J. J., Edmonds, J. A., and Wise, M. A.: 1999, The Role of Carbon Capture & Sequestration in a Long-Term Technology Strategy of Atmospheric Stabilization, PNNL-SA-30206, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J. A., Freund, P., and Dooley. J. J.: 2000, 'The Role of Carbon Management Technologies in Addressing Atmospheric Stabilization of Greenhouse Gases', Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia, August 13-August 16 (2000).

  • Edmonds, J., Scott, M. J., Roop J. M., and McCracken, C. N.: 1999, International Emissions Trading and Global Climate Change, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J. and Wise, M.: 1998, 'Building Backstop Technologies and Policies to Implement The Framework Convention on Climate Change', Energy & Environment 9(4), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J., Wise, M., Pitcher, H., Richels, R., Wigley, T., and MacCracken, C.: 1997, 'An Integrated Assessment of Climate Change and the Accelerated Introduction of Advanced Energy Technologies: An Application of MiniCAM 1.0', Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 1, 311–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J., Wise, M., Sands, R., Brown, R., and Kheshgi, H.: 1996, Agriculture, Land-Use, and Commercial Biomass Energy: A Preliminary Integrated Analysis of the Potential Role of Biomass Energy for Reducing Future Greenhouse Related Emissions, PNNL-11155, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, P.: 2000, Progress in Understanding the Potential Role of CO2 Storage, Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia, August 13-August 16 (2000).

  • Freund, P. and Ormerod, W. G.: 1997, 'Progress toward Storage of Carbon Dioxide', Energy Conversion and Management 38, Suppl. S199-S204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlicher, G. and Pruschek, R.: 1997, 'Comparison of CO2 Removal Systems for Fossil-Fuelled Power Plant Processes', Energy Conversion and Management 38, Suppl. S173-S178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H., Drake, E., and Adams, E.: 1997, 'CO2 Capture, Reuse, and Storage Technologies for Mitigation Global Climate Change', Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA): 2001, Putting Carbon Back in the Ground, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Stoke Orchard, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, http://www. ieagreen.org.uk/

  • International Energy Agency (IEA): 2002, Capture and Storage of CO 2, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Stoke Orchard, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, http://www. ieagreen.org.uk/removal.htm

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, U.K., and New York, NY, U.S.A., 881 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L. and Klein, D. E.: 2001, 'Carbon Sequestration: An Option for Mitigating Global Climate Change', CEP June 2001, 44–52, http:www.aiche.org/cep/

  • Kremen, C., Niles, J. O., Dalton, M. G., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Fay, J. P., Grewal, D., and Guillery, R. P.: 2000, 'Economic Incentives for Rain Forest Conservation across Scales', Science 288 (June), 1828–1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, J., Pepper, W. J., Swart, R. J., Edmonds, J., Meira Filho, L. G., Mintzer, I., Wang, M. X., and Wasson, J.: 1992, 'Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC: An Update', in Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCracken, C. N., Edmonds, J. A., Kim S. H., and Sands, R. D.: 1999, 'The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol', Energy J., Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, pp. 25–71 (May).

  • Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G.: 1999, 'The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?', Energy J., Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, pp. 1–23 (May).

  • McGrail, B. P., Reidel, S. P., Missfeldt, F., and Schaef, H. T.: 2002, 'Use and Features of Basalt Formations for Geologic Sequestration', in Matsumiya, N. (ed.), Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missfeldt, F. and Haites, E.: 2001, 'The Potential Contribution of Sinks to Meeting Kyoto Protocol Commitments', Environmental Science and Policy 4, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B. Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., La Rovere, E. L., Michaelis, L., Mori, S., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., Price, L., Raihi, K., Roehrl, A., Rogner, H.-H., Sankovski, A., Schlesinger, M., Shukla, P., Smith, S., Swart, R., van Rooijen, S., Victor, N., and Dadi, Z.: 2000, Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S. and Schopfhauser, W.: 1995, 'The Carbon-Sequestration Potential of a Global Afforestation Program', Clim. Change 30, 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I. R. and Scholes, R. J.: 2001, 'Sinks and the Kyoto Protocol', Climate Policy 1(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J., Mayer, M., and Harnisch, J.: 2000, Multiple Gas Control Under the Kyoto Protocol, Report 58, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, C., and Malone, E. L.: 1999, 'Introduction to Proceedings', in Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, C., and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Carbon Sequestration in Soils: Science, Monitoring, and Beyond, Proceedings of the St. Michaels Workshop, December 1998, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 210 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, N. and Scholes, R.: 2000, 'Additional Human-Induced Activities–Article 3.4.', inWatson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken D. J. (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: An IPCC Special Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 181–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger, B. and Karjalainen. T.: 2000, 'Afforestation, Reforestation and Deforestation Activities', in Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken D. J. (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: An IPCC Special Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 127–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze, R.: 1999, Biologische Quellen und Senken im Kyoto-Protokoll. Ein Plaedoyer fuer die Verknuepfung von internationalem Tropenwald-und Klimaschutz durch den Mechanismus fuer umweltvertraegliche Entwicklung, Diskussionspapier, Technische Universitaet Berlin, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. H., Kuuskraa, V. A., and Gale. J.: 2000, 'Sequestration of CO2 in Depleted Oil and Gas Fields: Global Capacity, Costs, and Barriers', Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia, August 13-August 16 (2000).

  • Stevens, S. H. and Taber, J. J.: 1999, Barriers to Overcome in Implementation of CO 2 Capture and Storage (Disused Oil and Gas Fields), IEA Report PH3/22, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken, D. J. (eds.): 2000, Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: An IPCC Special Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woerdman, E. and van der Gaast, W. P.: 2000, Project-Based Emissions Trading: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements on Cost-Effectiveness, ECOF Working Paper, First Draft, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, M.J., Edmonds, J.A., Mahasenan, N. et al. International Emission Trading and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation and Sequestration. Climatic Change 64, 257–287 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000025747.12101.37

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000025747.12101.37

Keywords

Navigation