Skip to main content
Log in

Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures' pollination and production

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem services are natural functions of an ecosystem that can be, secondarily, used for the benefit of humans. A recent estimate showed that ecosystem services equal, on average, 33 trillion dollars a year, with pollination being responsible for 112 billions dollars. The alteration of natural systems and the loss of pollinating species have caused a decrease in many crops' productivity. The objective of this work is to evaluate the pollination as an ecological service in agriculture, testing the hypothesis that the presence of forest remnants increases coffee agricultural productivity through an increase in pollination. This argument is based on the assumption that areas of preservation of native forest required by Brazilian law provide pollinators to local agroecosystems. Fruit production was compared among three different planting regimes: agrosilviculture, and conventional monoculture with and without preserved forest remnants nearby. The average flower production by branch was different among the farms and was not related to the planting methods. The first flowering was larger than the second, representing 81–98% of the flowers' total production. The farms near forest fragments had an increase of 14.6% in production that can be related to the pollinating services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizen M.A. and Feinsinger P. 1994. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75: 330–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M.A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and the Environment. 74: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier P.L. and Karr J.R. 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives. BiosScience 44: 690–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezerra M.C.L. and Veiga J.L. 2000. Agricultura sustentável. Ministério do Meio Ambiente/Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, Brasília, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia R., Gupta D., Chandel J.S. and Sharma N.K. 1995. Relative abundance of insect visitors on flowers of major subtropical fruits in Himachal Pradesh and their effect on fruit set. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 65: 907–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso I.M., Gruijt I., Franco F.S., Carvalho A.F. and Ferreira Neto P.S. 2001. Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agricultural Systems 69: 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho and Krug 1996. Coffee. In: Agriculture Research Service (ed) Agricultural Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp. 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky G. and Heal G. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391: 629–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collevatti R.G., Schoereder J.H. and Campos L.A.O. 2000. Foraging behavior of bee pollinators on the tropical weed Triumphetta semitriloba: Flight distance and directionality. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 60: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S. and Grasso M. 1997. The value of the world's service and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G.C. 1999. Developing a scientific basis for managing earth's life support systems. Conservation Ecology 3: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix M.E., Akkuzu E., Klopfenstein J., Zhang J., Kim M.S. and Foster J.E. 1997. Riparian refugia in agroforestry systems. Journal of Forestry: 38–41.

  • Fearnside P.M. 1998. Serviços ambientais da floresta amazônica como estratégia para a sustentação da população rural na região. In: Watanabe S. (ed) Anais do IV Simpósio de Ecossistemas Brasileiros. ACIESP, São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbi J.A. 2000. Is biodiversity-friendly coffee financially viable? An analysis of five different coffee production systems in western El Salvador. Ecological Economics 33: 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham R.T. and Jain T.B. 1998. Silviculture's role in managing boreal forests. Conservation Ecology 2: 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell M.P. 1985. Insect natural enemies as regulating factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard T.A. 1999. The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annual Review of Entomology 44: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ish-Am G. and Eisikowitch D. 1998. Low attractiveness of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) flowers to honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) limits fruit set in Israel. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnolgy 73: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns C.A., Inouye D.W. and Waser N.M. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy P.A. and Lee H.T. 1993. Choosing indicators of ecosystem integrity: wetlands as a model system. In: Woodley S., Kay J. and Francis G. (eds) Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys J.A. and Nentwig W. 1992. Augmentation of beneficial arthropods by strip-management. 4. Surface activity, movements and activity density of abundant carabid beetles in a cereal field. Oecologia (Berlin) 92: 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado P.A.L. 1989. Legislação das matas ciliares. In: Barbosa L.M. (ed) Simpósio sobre mata ciliar. Fundaçã Cargill, Campinas, SP, Brazil, pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerbo-Souza D.T. and Nogueira-Couto R.H. 1997. Atrativo para as abelhas Apis mellifera e polinização em café (Coffea arabica L.). Mensagem Doce 44: 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoorulhaq-Rafieuldin M. and Ghaffar A. 1978. Effect of insect pollination on fruit bearing in kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata), and physical and chemical properties of fruit. Journal of Apicultural Research 17: 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood E. and Garwin L. 1998. Costing the Earth: when ecology meets economics. Nature 395: 426–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson A., Buchamann S., O'Toole C., Westrich P. and Williams I. (eds) 1996. The Conservation of Bees. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moguel P. and Toledo V. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreti A.C., Silva R.M.B., Silva E.C.A., Alves M.L.T.M.F. and Otsuk I.P. 1996. Aumento na produção de sementes de girassol (Helianthus annuus) pela ação de insetos polinizadores. Scientia Agricola 53: 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S. and Li S. 1997. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390: 507–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaes W., Ribas O. and Novaes P.C. 2000. Agenda 21 Brasileira-Bases para discussão. MMA/PNUD, Brasília, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrzelka P., Korsching P.F. and Malia J.E. 1996. Farmers' attitudes and behavior toward sustainable agriculture. Journal of Environmental Education 28: 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto L.S., Pefecto I. and Hernandez J.C. 2000. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and the Environment 80: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho M., Kleinert-Giovannini A. and Imperatriz-Fonseca V.L. 1990. Important bee plants for stingless bees (Melipona and Trigonini) and Africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera) in neotropical habitats: a review. Apidologie 21: 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik D.W. 2002a. The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417: 708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik D.W. 2002b. Feral African Bees augment neotropical coffee yield. In: Pollinating Bees: The Conservation Link Between Agriculture and Nature. Ministry of Environment. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruark G.A. 1999. Agroforestry and sustainability: making a patchwork quilt. Journal of Forestry 97: 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood A.J. 1997. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissiere B., Rodet G., Cousin M., Botella L. and Grossa J. 1996. Pollination effectiveness of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a kiwifruit orchard. Horticultural Entomology 89: 453–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeresh G.K., Shaanker R.U. and Ganeshaiah K.N. (eds) 1993. Pollination in Tropics. International Union for the Study of Social Insects-Indian Chapter. Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicens N. and Bosch J. 2000. Pollinating efficacy of Osmia cornuta and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae, Apidae) on red delicious apple. Environmental Entomology 29: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo De Marco Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Marco, P., Coelho, F.M. Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures' pollination and production. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 1245–1255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000019402.51193.e8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000019402.51193.e8

Navigation