Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genes, species and ecosystems are often considered to be assets. The need to ensure a sufficient diversity of this asset is being increasingly recognised today. Asset managers in banks and insurance companies face a similar challenge. They are asked to manage the assets of their investors by constructing efficient portfolios. They deliberately make use of a phenomenon observed in the formation of portfolios: returns are additive, while risks diversify. This phenomenon and its implications are at the heart of portfolio theory. Portfolio theory, like few other economic theories, has dramatically transformed the practical work of banks and insurance companies. Before portfolio theory was developed about 50 years ago, asset managers were confronted with a situation similar to the situation the research on biodiversity faces today. While the need for diversification was generally accepted, a concept that linked risk and return on a portfolio level and showed the value of diversification was missing. Portfolio theory has closed this gap. This article first explains the fundamentals of portfolio theory and transfers it to biodiversity. A large part of this article is then dedicated to some of the implications portfolio theory has for the valuation and management of biodiversity. The last section introduces three development openings for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Article Open access 05 November 2018

Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini & Lasse Heje Pedersen

References

  • Artuso A. 1999. The pharmaceutical value of biodiversity reconsidered. Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics 9: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylward B. 1995. The role of plant screening and plant supply in biodiversity conservation, drug development and healthcare. In: Swanson T.M. (ed.), Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier E.B. 1994.Valuing environmental functions: tropical wetlands. Land Economics 70: 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz P. and Breyer F. 1993. Grundlagen der politischen Ökonomie. Band 1: Theorie der Wirtschaftssysteme. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodie Z., Marcus A.J. and Kane A. 1999. Investments. Irwin /McGraw Hill, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boman M. and Bostedt G. 1995. Valuing the Wolf in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeä, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey R.A. and Myers S.C. 1996. Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson G.P., Singer B.D. and Beebower G.L. 1991. Determinants of portfolio performance II. An update. Financial Analysts Journal 47: 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R. and Catao L. 2000. The New Economy and Global Stock Returns. IMF, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K., Pearce D., Perrings C.A. and Swanson T.M. 1993. Economics and the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns C. and Meyer-Bullerdiek F. 2000. Professionelles Portofoliomanagement. Aufbau, Umsetzung und Erfolgskontrolle strukturierter Anlagestrategien. Schäffer Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk Q.C.B. 1997. Islands: stability, diversity, conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran A. 1996. Investment Valuation. Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J.A. and Sherman P.B. 1991. Economics of Protected Areas. A New Look at Benefits and Costs. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker A.G., Gomez V. and Anderson S. 2001. The economic valuation of farm animal genetic resources. A survey of available methods. Ecological Economics 36: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton E.J. and Gruber M.J. 1987. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge F. 1998. Systematisierung ökonomischer Risiken durch globale Umweltprobleme. Gefahr für die Finanzmärkte? WWZ, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge F. 2001. Environment-induced systematisation of economic risks. In: Bouma J., Jeucken M. and Klinkers L. (eds), Sustainable Banking. Greenleaf, Sheffield, UK, pp. 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså J. and Lovett J.C. 1997. Biodiversity and environmental stability. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm O. 2000. Ecological structure and functions of biodiversity as element of its total economic value. Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod G. and Willis K.G. 1999. Economic Valuation of the Environment. Methods and Case Studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garz H., Günther S. and Moriabadi C. 2000. Portfolio-Management. Theorie und Anwendung. Bankakad.-Verl., Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier C. 1998. Donner une valeur à la biodiversité. Cahiers d'économie et sociologie rurales 46-47: 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisendorf S., Gronemann S., Hampicke U. and Immler H. 1998. Die Bedeutung des Naturvermögens und der Biodiversität für eine nachhaltige Wirtschaftsweise. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Erfassbarkeit und Wertmessung. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D. 1975. The theory of diversity-stability relationships in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 50: 237–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J.M. 1997. The value of biodiversity. Markets, society, and ecosystems. Land Economics 73: 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinold R.C. and Kahn R.N. 2000. Active Portfolio Management. A Quantitative Approach for Providing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B. 1992. World Conservation Monitoring Centre (Cambridge) and British Museum (London) Natural History 1992. Global biodiversity. Status of the Earth's living resources. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampicke U. 1999. The limits to economic valuation of biodiversity. International Journal of Social Economics 26: 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensel C., Ezra D. and Ilkiw J. 1991. The importance of the asset allocation decision. Financial Analysts Journal 47: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood V.H., Watson R.T. and United Nations Environment Programme 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobohm C. 2000. Biodiversität. Quelle & Meyer Verlag, Wiebelsheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C.S. 1973. Resilience and the stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaylen M.S., Wade J.W. and Frank D.B. 1992. Stochastic trend, weather and US corn yield variability. Applied Economics 24: 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp R.J. and Smith V.K. 1993. Valuing Natural Assets. The Economics of Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüsselberg H.G. 1984. Vermögen im Systemvergleich-die Problemstellung. In: Krüsselberg H.G. (ed.), Vermögen im Systemvergleich. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamadji S., Fautrier A.G., McNeil D.L. and Sedcole J.R. 1995. Proposed breeding strategy for yield improvement of hexaploid triticale (3 triticosecale Wittmack) 1. Genetic variability and phenotypic stability. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 23: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughland A.S., Musser W.N., Shortle J.S. and Musser L.M. 1996. Construct validity of averting cost measures of environmental benefits. Land Economics 72: 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch A. 1999. Der ökonomische Wert der Biodiversität. In: Görg C. (ed.), Zugänge zur Biodiversität. Disziplinäre Thematisierungen und Möglichkeiten integrierender Ansätze. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg, Germany, pp. 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J. 1965. Security prices, risk and maximal gains from diversification. Journal of Finance 20: 587–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring L. 2001. Biodiversity, biocomplexity, and the economics of genetic dissimilarity. Land Economics 77: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marggraf R. and Birner R. 1998. The Conservation of Biological Diversity from an Economic Point of View. Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H.M. 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H.M. 1959. Portfolio Selection. Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R. 1996. Market failure and environmental degradation. In: Swanson T.M. (ed.), The Economics of Environmental Degradation. Tragedy for the Commons? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R. and Balick M. 1996. The value of undiscovered pharmaceuticals in tropical forests. Economic Botany 49: 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J. 1966. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34: 768–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N. 1980. The Sinking Ark. A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species.Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi K.S. and Khehra A.S. 1996. Effect of selection on the components of genetic variability for grain yield and its components under two plant densities in maize (zea mays L.). The Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 56: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R., FalconW. and Zavaleta E. 1997.Variability and growth in grain yields, 1950-1994. Does the record point to greater instability? Population and Development Review 23: 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes P.A.L.D. and van den Bergh J.C.J.M. 2001. Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense? Ecological Economics 39: 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson R.L. 1999. Olson on asset allocation. Investment Policy 2: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1992. Benefits Estimates and Environmental Decision Making. OECD, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. 1995. Blueprint 4. Capturing Global Environmental Value. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. and Barbier E.B. 2000. Blueprint for a Sustainable Economy. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. and Puroshothaman S. 1995. The economic value of plant-based pharmaceuticals. In: Swanson T.M. (ed.), Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. and Turner R.K. 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C. 1995. The economic value of biodiversity. In: Heywood V.H. and Watson R.T. (eds), Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 823–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C. 1998. Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environmental and Resource Economics 11: 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C. and Stern D.I. 1998. Modelling loss of resilience in agroecosystems. Rangelands in Botswana. Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 185–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirscher F. 1997. Moglichkeiten und Grenzen der Integration von Artenvielfalt in die okonomische Bewertung vor dem Hintergrund ethischer Normen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plän T. 1999. Ökonomische Bewertungsansätze biologischer Vielfalt. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S., Camm J.D. and Garber-Yonts B. 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively. An application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics 77: 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter P.M., Lauer J.G., Huggins D.R., Oplinger E.S. and Crookston R.K. 1998. Assessing spatial and temporal variability of corn and soybean yields. Journal of Production Agriculture 11: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A. 1986. Creating Shareholder Value. The New Standard for Business Performance. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S.A. 1976. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäller G. 1991. Wirkung der Umweltfaktoren und Anpassung der tierischen Organismen. In: Schubert R. (ed.), Lehrbuch der Ökologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany, pp. 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R.H. and Terberger E. 1997. Grundzüge der Investitions-und Finanzierungstheorie. Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurle B. 1996. The impact of size on yield variability and crop insurance premiums. Review of Agricultural Economics 18: 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • SharpeW.F. 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19: 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W.F. 1970. Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson D.R., Sedjo R.A. and Reid J.W. 1996.Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Political Economy 104: 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K.V. 1996a. Estimating Economic Values for Nature. Methods for Non-market Valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K.V. 1996b. Resource evaluation at a crossroads. In: Smith K.V. (ed.), Estimating EconomicValues for Nature. Methods for Non-market Valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow A.R., Polasky S. and Broadus J. 1993. On the Measurement of Biological Diversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens T.H., DeCoteau N.E. and Willis C.E. 1997. Sensitivity of contingent valuation to alternative payment schedules. Land Economics 73: 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1991. Conserving biological diversity. In: Pearce D. (ed.), Blueprint 2. Greening theWorld Economy. Earthscan, London, pp. 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1992. Economics of a biodiversity convention. Ambio 21: 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1994. The International Regulation of Extinction. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1996. The economics of environmental degradation. An institutional approach. In: Swanson T.M. (ed.), The Economics of Environmental Degradation. Tragedy for the Commons? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1997. Global Action for Biodiversity. An International Framework for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. 1999. Why is there a biodiversity convention? The international interest in centralized development planning. International Affairs 75: 307–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T.M. and Goeschl T. 1998. The Management of Genetic Resources for Agriculture. Ecology and Information, Externalities and Policies. CSERGE, Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J. 1958. Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of Economic Studies 25: 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel G. and Angermann H. 1990. Dtv-Atlas zur Biologie. Tafeln und Texte. Band 2. Dt. Taschenbuch-Verlag, München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkart R. 1998. Shareholder value & Corporation Valuation. Finanzielle Wertorientierung im Wandel. Versus, Zürich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikard H.-P. 1998. Der Wert der Artenvielfalt. Eine methodische Herausforderung an die Ökonomik. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 21: 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikard H.-P. 2002. Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity. Land Economics 78: 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M.L. 1992. On diversity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 363–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M.L. 1993. What to preserve? An application of diversity theory to crane conservation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood P.M. 1997. Biodiversity as the source of biological resources: a new look at biodiversity values. Environmental Values 6: 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of the Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

    Frank Figge

Authors
  1. Frank Figge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figge, F. Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 827–849 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011729.93889.34

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011729.93889.34

Search

Navigation