Skip to main content
Log in

Does the EEG During Isoflurane/Alfentanil Anesthesia Differ from Linear Random Data?

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective.Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used to monitor depth of anesthesia. In the majority of publications this has been done using the so called Bispectral (BIS) Index. The exact relation of this index to bispectral quantities like the bispectrum and its normalized version the bicoherence has not yet been published. In case the EEG is a linear random process the bicoherence is trivial. It is a mere constant independent of the EEG frequency. If the signal is a linear Gaussian random process this constant is zero. In this case both the bispectrum and bicoherence are zero. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of EEG epochs with non-trivial bicoherence during anesthesia with isoflurane/nitrous oxide. Methods.We reanalyzed 26.4 hr of EEG signal recorded in 8 patients during anesthesia for general abdominal surgery which were stored in digitized form on CD-Rom. The test developed by Hinich for Gaussianity and linearity was applied to these data. The test was validated with various kinds of surrogate data; especially the phase randomized (pr) EEG, synthetic Gaussian random data and the z-component of the Lorenz attractor and its pr version. Results.The proportion of epochs for which a non-trivial bicoherence was detected by the test was as follows: Lorenz data 95%, pr Lorenz data 5%, synthetic Gaussian data 13.8%, pr EEG 5.4%, original EEG 6.2%. Conclusion.As expected the test procedure correctly identified for the Lorenz data for 95% of all epochs a non-trivial bicoherence. For the original EEG data we could not find a significant greater percentage of epochs with non-trivial bicoherence than for the pr data and the synthetic Gaussian data. We conclude that the EEG during anesthesia with isoflurane/alfentanil appears to be largely a linear random process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Todd MM. EEGs, EEG processing, and the bispectral index. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 815-817

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sigl JC, Chamoun NG. An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 392-404

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marek M, I S. Chaotic Behaviour of deterministic dissipative systems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pritchard WS, Duke DW. Measuring chaos in the brain: A tutorial review of nonlinear dynamical EEG analysis. Int J Neurosci 1992; 67: 31-80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roschke J. Strange attractors, chaotic behavior and informational aspects of sleep EEG data. Neuropsychobiology 1992; 25: 172-176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong J, Kim SY, Han SH. Non-linear dynamical analysis of the EEG in Alzheimer's disease with optimal embedding dimension. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106: 220-228

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pijn JP, Velis DN, van der Heyden MJ, DeGoede J, van Veelen CW, Lopes da Silva FH. Nonlinear dynamics of epileptic seizures on basis of intracranial EEG recordings. Brain Topogr 1997; 9: 249-270

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bendat Julius S PAG. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. John Wiley & Son, Inc. 1971

  9. Gantert C, Honerkamp J, Timmer J. Analyzing the dynamics of hand tremor time series. Biol Cybern 1992; 66: 479-484

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rao T, Gabr M. A test for linearity of stationary time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1980; 1: 479-484

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinich M. Testing for gaussianity an linearity of a stationary time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1982; 3: 169-176

    Google Scholar 

  12. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer J. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D 1992; 58: 77-94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grassberger P, Procaccia I. Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D 1983; 9: 189-208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glass L, Kaplan D, Lewis J. Tests for deterministics in real and model neutral networks, nonlinear dynamical analysis of the EEG. In: Jansen BH, Brand ME, eds., Singapore, World Scientific 1993: 233-249

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silva F. EEG analysis: Theory and practice. In: Niedermeyer, E, Silva Fld, eds., Electroencephaolgraphy. Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, 2nd ed. Baltimore-Munich, Urban & Schwarzenberg 1987: 871-897

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dummermuth G, Huber P, Kleiner B, Gasser T. Analysis of the interrelation between ferquency bands of the EEG by means of the bispectrum. A preliminary study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1971; 31: 137-148

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett T, Johnson L, Naitoh P, Hicks N, Nute C. Bispectrum analysis of electroencephalogram signals during waking and sleeping. Science 1971; 172: 401-402

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stam C, Suffczynski P, Lopes da Silva F. Dynamics of the human alpha rhythm: Evidence for non-linearity? Clinical Neurophysiology 1999; 110: 1801-1813

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ning T, Bronzino J. Bispectral analysis of the rat EEG during various vigilance states. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989; 36: 497-499

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ihmsen H, Tzabazis A, Schywalsky M, Schwilden H. Propofol in rats: Testing for nonlinear pharmacokinetics and modelling acute tolerance to EEG effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19: 177-188

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pritchard W, Stam C. Nonlinearity in human resting, eyes-closed EEG: An in-depth study. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2000; 60: 109-121

    Google Scholar 

  22. Creutzfeld O, Houchin J. Neuronal basis of EEG waves, handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Amsterdam, Elsevier 1974: 5-55

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sokal Robert R RFJ. Biometry. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwilden, H., Jeleazcov, C. Does the EEG During Isoflurane/Alfentanil Anesthesia Differ from Linear Random Data?. J Clin Monit Comput 17, 449–457 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026284321451

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026284321451

Navigation