Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of axial length of normal eyes on PERG

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of the axial length (AL) of the eye on flash electroretinogram (ERG) responses has been well established in the literature, suggesting an association between ERG abnormalities with myopia (AL > 25 mm). The aim of our present study was to determine whether the AL of normal eyes can also influence the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) on normal subjects. Thirty-nine normal volunteers were subjected to PERG measurements following the standard set by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV). The AL of the eyeball was measured using a TOMEY ultrasonic A scanner. Each volunteer had a complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, visual field, colour vision, orthoptic assessment and retinal photographs and had a best corrected visual acuity of 6/9 or better. Only one eye from each of the 39 normal volunteers was included in the statistical analysis of the results. The normal volunteer group had a mean P50 amplitude of 3.8 ± 1.1 SD μV. The range of AL was between 21.8 and 25.7 mm (mean = 23.8 ± 1.0 SD mm). Overall findings obtained from this investigation indicate a significant correlation between the AL of normal eyes and the PERG P50 amplitude (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = −0.413, p < 0.01). The correlation accounts for 17% of the variance observed in the 39 amplitude values. This confirms the current hypothesis that the PERG amplitude is inversely related to axial length and means that AL should be considered when interpreting PERG amplitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perlman I, Meyer E, Haim T, Zonis S. Retinal function in high refractive error assessed electroretinographically. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68(2): 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pallin O. The influence of the axial size of the eye on the size of the recorded b-potential in the clinical single-flash electroretinogram. Acta Ophthalmol 1969; 191 (suppl): 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Westall CA, Dhaliwal HS, Panton CM, Sigesmund D, Levin AV, Nischal KK, et al. Values of electroretinogram responses according to axial length. Doc Ophthalmol 2001; 102: 115–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bach M, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Marmor MF, Meigen T, Veagan, et al. Standard for pattern electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 101: 11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen JS. The sagital growth of the eye. IV. Ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol 1971; 49: 873–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous. Standard for clinical electroretinography. International Standardization Committee. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107(6): 816–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JF, Elsner AE, Burns SA, Hansen RM, Lou PL, Kwong KK, et al. The effect of eye shape on retinal responses. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7(6): 520–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawabata H, Adachi-Usami E. Multifocal Electroretinogram in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2844–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hidajat, R., Mclay, J., Burley, C. et al. Influence of axial length of normal eyes on PERG. Doc Ophthalmol 107, 195–200 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026282425885

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026282425885

Navigation