Abstract
Niels Bohr's term‘complementarity' has been used by several authors to capture the essential aspects of the cognitive and epistemological development of scientific and mathematical concepts. In this paper we will conceive of complementarity in terms of the dual notions of extension and intension of mathematical terms. A complementarist approach is induced by the impossibility to define mathematical reality independently from cognitive activity itself. R. Thom, in his lecture to the Exeter International Congress on Mathematics Education in 1972,stated ‘‘the real problem which confronts mathematics teaching is not that of rigor,but the problem of the development of‘meaning’, of the ‘existence' of mathematical objects''. Student's insistence on absolute ‘meaning questions’, however,becomes highly counter-productive in some cases and leads to the drying up of all creativity. Mathematics is, first of all,an activity, which, since Cantor and Hilbert, has increasingly liberated itself from metaphysical and ontological agendas. Perhaps more than any other practice,mathematical practice requires acomplementarist approach, if its dynamics and meaning are to be properly understood. The paper has four parts. In the first two parts we present some illustrations of the cognitive implications of complementarity. In the third part, drawing on Boutroux' profound analysis, we try to provide an historical explanation of complementarity in mathematics. In the final part we show how this phenomenon interferes with the endeavor to explain the notion of number.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ausubel, D.P.: 1960, ‘The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal learning’, Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 267–272.
Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H. (eds.): 1983, Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beth, E. and Piaget, J.: 1966, Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Bochner, S.: 1966, The Role of Mathematics in the Rise of Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Boutroux, P.: 1920, L'Idéal Scientifique Des Mathématiciens, F. Alcan, Paris.
Bruner, J.S.: 1961, ‘The act of discovery’, Harvard Educational Review 31(1), 21–32.
Cantor, G.: 1883/1980, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Castonguay, C.: 1972, Meaning and Existence in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, Wien.
Dedekind, R.: 1969, Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Douady, R.: 1991, ‘Tool, object, setting, window,’ in A. Bishop, J. van Dormolen and S. Mellin-Olsen (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge: Its Growth Through Teaching, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 109–132.
Dummett, M.: 1991, Frege, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Frege, G.: 1988, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl / auf d. Grundlage d. Centenarausg. hrsg. von Christian Thiel, Meiner, Hamburg.
Frege, G.: 1969, Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Frege, G.: 1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic, Blackwell, Oxford.
Gödel, K.: 1944, ‘Russell's Mathematical Logic’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Open Court, La Salle, pp. 123–154.
Hintikka, J.: 1992, ‘Kant on the Mathematical Method,’ in C. Posy (ed.), Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Jahnke, H.N.: 1990, Mathematik und Bildung in der Humboldtschen Reform, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Jahnke, H.N.: 1992, ‘Beweisbare Widersprüche-Komplementarität in der Mathematik’, in E.P. Fischer, H.S. Herzka and K.H. Reich (eds.), Widersprüchliche Wirklichkeit, Piper, München, Zürich, pp. 98–130.
Jakobson R. and Halle, M.: 1956, Fundamentals of Language, Mouton, The Hague.
Kuyk, W.: 1977, Complementarity in Mathematics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Lebesgue, H.: 1966, Measure and the integral, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Lebesgue, H.: 1974, Message d'un Mathématicien, Blanchard, Paris.
Minsky, M.L.: 1967, Computation: finite and infinite machines, Prentice-Hall, London.
Otte, M. and Steinbring, H.: 1977, ‘Probleme der Begriffsentwicklung-zum Stetigkeitsbegriff’, Didaktik der Mathematik 1, 16–25.
Otte, M., Keitel, C. and Seeger, F.: 1980, ‘Text, Wissen, Tätigkeit,’ Königstein/ Ts.: Scriptor.
Otte, M.: 1984, ‘Komplementarität’, Dialektik 8, 60–75.
Otte, M.: 1990, ‘Arithmetic and Geometry-Some Remarks on the Concept of Complementarity’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 10, 37–62.
Otte, M.: 1994, Das Formale, das Soziale und das Subjektive, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt/ M..
Otte, M.: 1994a, ‘Intuition and logic in mathematics’, in D.E. Robitaille, D.H. Wheeler and C. Kieran (eds.), Selected Lectures from the Seventh International Congress on Mathematical Education, Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, pp. 271–284.
Peirce CP:= Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes I-VI, edited by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiß, 1931–1935; Volumes VII-VIII, edited by A.W. Burks, 1958, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (reference by volume and paragraph numbers)
Peirce MS:= Robin, R.S: 1967, Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce, The University of Massachusetts Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce NEM:= Eisele, C. (ed.): 1967, The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce, Vol. I-IV, Mouton / Humanities Press, The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Highlands, N.J.
Port-Royal Logic / [by Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole]. Transl. from the French with introd. notes and appendix by Thomas Spencer Baynes, 2nd edition, Sutherland and Knox, Edinburgh.
Potter, M.: 1990, Sets, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Quine, W.V.: 1969, Ontological Relativity and other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Reid, C.: 1970, Hilbert, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Russell, B.: 1903/1937, The Principles of Mathematics, Routledge, London.
Russell, B.: 1954, The Analysis of Matter, Allan & Unwin, London.
Russell, B.: 1971, in R.C. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, Allen & Unwin, London.
Russell, B.: 1998, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Routledge, London.
Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1–36.
Thom, R.: 1973, 'Modern mathematics: Does it exist?, in A.G. Howson (ed.), Developments in Mathematical Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 194–212.
Winter, H.: 1982, ‘Das Gleichheitszeichen im Mathematikunterricht’, Mathematica Didactica 5, 185–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otte, M. Complementarity, sets and numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics 53, 203–228 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026001332585
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026001332585