Abstract
We report an experiment examining the effect of three factors on professional Hong Kong liquidators' decisions to bring legal action in negligence against auditors. Factors were (a) the strength (merit) of the supporting evidence (arguable vs. overwhelming), (b) the type of alleged audit failure (failure to report financial statement errors vs. management fraud) and (c) audit firm type (Big 6 vs. non-Big 6). We find evidence that liquidators' litigation decisions are influenced by case merit. We also find that liquidators were marginally more likely to institute legal action against a Big 6 than against a non-Big 6 auditor. However, we find no evidence that the type of alleged audit failure influences litigation decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, S. A. and J. L. Willingham: 1993, 'An Evaluation of SAS No. 53, The Auditors Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities', The Expectation Gap Standards: Progress, Implementation Issues, Research Opportunities (AICPA, New York).
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 1988, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 53, The Auditors Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities (AICPA, New York).
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 1993, Meeting the Financial Reporting Needs of the Future: A Public Commitment from the Accounting Profession ( June).
Andersen, Arthur & Co., Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG Peat Marwick, and Price Waterhouse: 1992, 'The Liability Crisis in the United States: Impact on the Accounting Profession (A Statement of Position),' Reprinted in Journal of Accountancy (November), pp. 19-23.
Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo and K. R. Subramanyam: 1998, 'The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management', Contemporary Accounting Research 15, 1-24.
Cloyd, C. Brian, James R. Frederickson and John W. Hill: 1996, 'Motivating Factors in Lawsuits Against Independent Auditors: Experimental Evidence on the Importance of Causality', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 15, 185-218.
Cloyd, C. Brian, James R. Frederickson and John W. Hill: 1998, 'Independent Auditor Litigation: Recent Events and Related Research', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17(2), 121-142.
DeAngelo, Linda. 1981: 'Auditor Size and Audit Quality', Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 183-199.
Dye, R.: 1993, 'Auditing Standards, Legal Liability and Auditor Wealth', Journal of Political Economy 101, 887-914.
Epstein, Marc J. and Marshall A. Geiger: 1994, 'Investor Views of Audit Assurance: Recent Evidence of the Expectation Gap', Journal of Accountancy ( January), 60-66.
Firth, Michael: 1990, 'Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors', Rand Journal of Economics 21(3), 374-387.
Gul, Ferdinand A. and S. Tsui: 1998, 'A Test of the Free Cash Flow and Debt Monitoring Hypotheses: Evidence from Audit Pricing', Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(2), 219-237.
Gul, Ferdinand A.: 1999, 'Audit Price, Product Differentiation and Economic Equilibrium', Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18(1), 90-100.
Hong Kong Society of Accountants: 1991, 'Statement 3.271, The Auditor's Responsibility in Relation to Fraud, Other Irregularities and Errors', Hong Kong Statement of Auditing Standards (HKSA, Hong Kong).
International Federation of Accountants: 1995, Auditor's Legal Liability in the Marketplace (IFA, New York).
Kadous, Kathryn: 2000, 'The Effects of Audit Quality and Consequence Severity on Juror Evaluation of Auditor Responsibility for Plaintiff Losses', The Accounting Review 75 ( July), 327-341.
Lennox, Clive S.: 1999, 'Audit Quality and Auditor Size: An Evaluation of Reputation and Deep Pockets Hypotheses', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26 (September/October), 779-805.
Lochner, Phillip R.: 1993, 'Accountants' Legal Liability: A Crisis That Must Be Addressed', Accounting Horizons ( June), 92-96.
Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna: 1987, 'Litigation and Independent Auditors: The Role of Business Failures and Management Fraud', Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring), 90-103.
Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna: 1988, 'An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality', The Accounting Review 58(1), 55-73.
Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna: 1991, 'Trials of Legal Disputes Involving Independent Auditors: Some Empirical Evidence', Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Supplement), 149-185.
Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna: 1997, 'Audit Litigation Research: Do the Merits Matter? An Assessment and Directions for Future Research', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16, 355-378.
Priest, G. L. and B. Klein: 1984, 'The Selection of Disputes for Litigation', Journal of Legal Studies ( January), 1-55.
Rosenberg, D. and S. Shavell: 1985, 'A Model in which Suits are Brought for Their Nuisance Value', International Review of Law and Economics 5, 3-13.
Shavell, S.: 1982, 'Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis Under Alternative Methods for Allocation of Legal Costs', Journal of Legal Studies 11 ( January), 55-81.
St. Pierre, K. and J. A. Anderson: 1984, 'An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Public Accountants', The Accounting Review 54(2), 242-263.
Stice, J. D.: 1991, 'Using Financial and Market Information to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Auditors', The Accounting Review 66(3), 516-533.
Sullivan, J.: 1992, 'Litigation Risk Broadly Considered', Proceedings of the 1992 Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems (School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS), pp. 49-59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, M.J., Majid, A. To Sue or Not to Sue: An Experimental Study of Factors Affecting Hong Kong Liquidators Audit Litigation Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 363–374 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025624329105
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025624329105