Skip to main content
Log in

Variograms of Ancillary Data to Aid Sampling for Soil Surveys

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To provide reliable estimates for mapping soil properties for precision agriculture requires intensive sampling and costly laboratory analyses. If the spatial structure of ancillary data, such as yield, digital information from aerial photographs, and soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements, relates to that of soil properties they could be used to guide the sampling intensity for soil surveys. Variograms of permanent soil properties at two study sites on different parent materials were compared with each other and with those for ancillary data. The ranges of spatial dependence identified by the variograms of both sets of properties are of similar orders of magnitude for each study site. Maps of the ancillary data appear to show similar patterns of variation and these seem to relate to those of the permanent properties of the soil. Correlation analysis has confirmed these relations. Maps of kriged estimates from sub-sampled data and the original variograms showed that the main patterns of variation were preserved when a sampling interval of less than half the average variogram range of ancillary data was used. Digital data from aerial photographs for different years and EC appear to show a more consistent relation with the soil properties than does yield. Aerial photographs, in particular those of bare soil, seem to be the most useful ancillary data and they are often cheaper to obtain than yield and EC data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackmer, T. M., Schepers, J. S. and Meyer, G. E. 1995. Remote sensing to detect nitrogen deficiency in corn. In: Proceedings of Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems. Second International Conference, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA), pp. 505-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, G. and Marcotte, D. 1991. Multivariable variogram and its application to the linear model of coregionalization. Mathematical Geology 23, 899-928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. J. and Johnston, A. E. 1997. Aspects of soil fertility in the interpretation of yield maps as an aid to precision farming. In: Precision Agriculture '97. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Precision agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, England) pp. 87-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, S. J. 1985. Soils of Crowmarsh Battle Farms (Soil Survey of England and Wales).

  • Frogbrook, Z. L. 1999. The effect of sampling intensity on the reliability of predictions and maps of soil properties. In: Precision Agriculture '99. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK), pp. 71-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frogbrook, Z. L. and Oliver, M. A. 2000. The effect of sampling on the accuracy of predictions of soil properties for precision agriculture. In: Accuracy 2000. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in Amsterdam, edited by G. B. M. Heuvelink and M. J. P. M. Lemmens (Delft University Press, Delft, Netherlands), pp. 225-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heming, S. 1997. Soil Survey and Soil Data Base of Part of Westridge Farm and Mapletons Farm for Yattendon Estates (Soil Services Limited, Winchester, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. M. 1974. Soil Survey Field Handbook. Technical Monograph No. 5 (Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing. A Remote Sensing Perspective (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. E., Barraclough, P. B., Poulton, P. R. and Dawson, C. J. 1998. Assessment of Some Spatially Variable Soil Factors Limiting Crop Yields (The International Fertiliser Society, York, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, E. D., Colin, P. E., Christy, D. and Drummond, P. E. 1999. Applying Soil Electrical Conductivity Technology to Precision Agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA), pp. 1089-1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. R. and Kremmer, P. R. 1998. An Investigation into the Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Yield Maps (The International Fertiliser Society, York, UK) Proceedings No. 421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, D. J. 1997. Geostatistics, remote sensing and precision farming. In: Precision Agriculture: Spatial and Temporal Variability of Environmental Quality, edited by J. V. Lake, G. R. Bock and J. A. Goode (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK), pp. 110-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, D. J. and Schepers, J. S. 1997. Key processes and properties for site specific soil and crop management. In: The State of Site Specific Management for Agriculture, edited by F. J. Pierce and E. J. Sadler (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA), pp. 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. W. (ed.) 2000. The Guide to GenStat: Part 2, Statistics (VSN International, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M. A. 2001. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. and Anderson, G. L. 1999. Airbourne videography to identify spatial plant growth variability in grain sorghum. Precision Agriculture 1, 67-79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerry, R., Oliver, M.A. Variograms of Ancillary Data to Aid Sampling for Soil Surveys. Precision Agriculture 4, 261–278 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024952406744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024952406744

Navigation