Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosing Response Style Behavior by Means of a Latent-Class Factor Approach. Socio-Demographic Correlates of Gender Role Attitudes and Perceptions of Ethnic Discrimination Reexamined

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally accepted that response style behavior in survey research may seriously distort the measurement of attitudes and subsequent causal models that include attitudinal dimensions. However, there in no single accepted methodological approach in dealing with this issue. This article aims at illustrating the flexibility of a latent class factor approach in diagnosing response style behavior and in adjusting findings from causal models with latent variables. We present a substantive example from the Belgian MHSM research project on integration-related attitudes among ethnic minorities. We argue that an extreme response style can be detected in analyzing two independent sets of Likert-type questions referring to `gender roles' and `feelings of ethnic discrimination'. If the response style is taken into account the effect of covariates on attitudinal dimensions is more adequately estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwin, D. F. & Krosnick, J. A. (1985). The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 535–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, G. B. & O'Malley, P. M. (1984). Black-white differences in self-esteem: Are they affected by response styles? American Journal of Sociology 90: 624–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. N. (1955). Authoritarianism or acquiescence? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 616–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, N. H. & Wolkon, G. H. (1964). A forced-choice form of the F-scale free of acquiescent response set. Sociometry 24: 54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J. B. & McClendon, M. J. (2000). Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling 7: 608–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J. & Campbell, D. T. (1957). Response set in the F-scale. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. W.-L. & Chan, W. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 9: 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G.W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in crosscultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31: 187–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, J. & Vaughan, G. M. (1970). Using balanced scales to control acquiescence. Sociometry 33: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, A. & Keniston, K. (1960). Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement 6: 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. H., Cunningham, I. C. M. & Green, R. T. (1977). The ipsative process to reduce response set bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, C. (1967). Acquiescence in the MMPI. Psychological Reports 20: 927–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, C. & Van Pelt, J. (1967). Further evidence concerning acquiescence and the MMPI. Psychological Reports 20: 935–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P. & Citrin, J. (1994). Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgements opposites? American Journal of Political Science 38: 256–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, E. A. (1992). Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical Longitudinal Data – Loglinear Analysis of Panel, Trend and Cohort Data. Sage: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, J. R. (1998). Timidity as a Response Style to Psychological Questionnaires. The Journal of Psychology 132: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. & Messick, S. (1961). Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants on the MMPI. Educational and Psychological Measurement 21: 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (ed.) (2000). Communities and Generations. Turkish and Moroccan Population in Belgium. Brussels: VUB University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorge, I. (1937). Gen-like: Halo or reality. Psychological Bulletin 34: 545–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magidson, J. and Vermunt, J. K. (2001). Latent class factor and cluster models, bi-plots, and related graphical displays. Sociological Methodology 31: 223–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogar, R. E. (1960). Three versions of the F-scale and performance on the semantic differential. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 262–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moors, G. (2001). Family theory: The role of changing values, In: N. J. Smelzer & P. B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 5397–5401.

  • Parsons, T. & Shils, E.A. (eds.) (1951). Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. In: J. P. Robinson & R. P. Shaver (eds.), Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes Series, Vol. 1. San Diego: Academic, pp. 17–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. J. (1983). Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. Journal of Social Psychology 121: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1963). The double agreement phenomenon: Three hypotheses. Psychological Review 70: 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin 63: 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samelson, F. (1964). Agreement set and anticontent attitudes in the F-scale: A reinterpretation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68: 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, H. & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, B. (1987). The impact of agreement bias on the ranking of questionnaire response. Journal of Social Psychology 127: 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. & Magidson, J. (2000). LatentGold. User's Guide. Belmont: Statistical Innovations Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. (2000). Multinomial logit latent-class regression models: An analysis of the predictors of gender-role attitudes among Japanese women. American Journal of Sociology 105: 1702–1740.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research Methods and Techniques, Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Guy Moors

Authors
  1. Guy Moors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moors, G. Diagnosing Response Style Behavior by Means of a Latent-Class Factor Approach. Socio-Demographic Correlates of Gender Role Attitudes and Perceptions of Ethnic Discrimination Reexamined. Quality & Quantity 37, 277–302 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024472110002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024472110002

Search

Navigation