Skip to main content
Log in

Insect Conservation in an Urban Biodiversity Hotspot: The San Francisco Bay Area

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The San Francisco Bay Area hosts a diverse insect fauna and a dense cluster of urban areas. The high diversity of insects in the Bay Area arises for three primary reasons: its location in the California biotic province, the diverse local environment and the entomologist-area effect. The juxtaposition of high insect diversity and an area intensively used by humans led to the first recorded extinction as well as the first efforts to conserve insects in the United States. Habitat loss due to urbanization, agriculture, and invasive species is largely responsible for local extinctions and reduction in abundance of the remaining species. Invasive species such as the Argentine ant and pathogens causing mortality of oaks and pines are poised to have substantial impacts on the insect fauna of the Bay Area in the near future. Understanding which taxa can or cannot persist in remnant habitat patches within an urban or agricultural matrix, and what management practices would encourage persistence should be a focus of future research. Assessments of population status should be focused on insects at risk of extinction because of their restricted geographic ranges, low vagility, interactions with invasive species, or known reduction in their habitat. Assessments that combine examinations of museum collections, literature, and field surveys might enable determination of the status of many species within the Bay Area. Such an approach might better define the scope and magnitude of the problem of conserving insects in an increasingly urbanized region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, R.A. (1983) Ecological studies of six endangered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): Island biogeography, patch dynamics, and design of habitat preserves. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 99, 1–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) (2001) Bay Area Census. http://census.abag.ca.gov/historical/copop1860-2000. htm, April 25, 2002.

  • Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) (2002) ABAG Projections 2002. http://www.abag.ca.gov/abag/overview/pub/p2002/ regional.html, May 8, 2002.

  • Baldinger, A. (1993) Systematics and population biology of Arcitalitrus sylvaticus (Haswell, 1879) in San Francisco, 96 pp. Masters thesis, San Francisco State University.

  • Bay Area Open Space Council (2002) Bay area open space map. http:// maps.openspacecouncil.org/cgi-bin/zoom/Land/ba, May 5, 2002.

  • Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol. Conserv. 80, 113–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossard, C.C., Randall, J.M. and Hoshovsky, M.C. (2000) Invasive plants of California's wildlands, 360 pp. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossart, J.L. and Carlton, C.E. (2002) Insect conservation in America: Status and perspectives. Am. Entomol. 48, 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappiella, K. (2001) Land use/impervious cover relationships in the Chesapeake Bay. Watershed Protec. Tech. 3, 835–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.N. and Carlton, J.T. (1995) Biological Report. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in a United States Estuary: A Case Study of the Biological Invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, E.F. and McCoy, E.D. (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am. Natural. 113, 791–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, E.F. and McCoy, E.D. (2000) Species-area relationships. In Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol. 5, (S.A. Levin, ed.), pp. 397–412. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J.H. (1993) The Mission Blue, Plebejus icarioides missionensis Hovanitz, In Conservation biology of lycaenidae (butterflies). (T.R. New, ed.), pp. 139–40. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, No. 8. Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions (2001) Digest of environmental statistics. London, UK: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A.P., Rodriguez, J.P., Roberts, W.M. and Wilcove, D.S. (1997) Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R.V. and Gill, R. (1989) Exotic invertebrates and their effects on California. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 65, 132–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreistadt, S.H., Dahlsten, D.L. and Frankie, G.W. (1990) Urban forests and insect ecology. Bioscience 40, 192–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., White, R.R., Singer, M.C., McKechnie, S.W. and Gilbert, L.W. (1975) Checkerspot Butterflies: A historical perspective. Science 188, 221–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. and Murphy, D.D. (1987) Conservation lessons from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 1, 122–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essig Museum (2001) California's endangered insects. University of California, Berkeley, http://www.mip.berkeley.edu/essig/, April 29, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (1996) Rules and regulations. 62(224), 61916–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstall, R.L. (1996) Population of States and Counties of the United States: 1790 to 1990. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

  • Frankie, G.W., Thorp, R.W., Schindler, M.H., Ertter, B. and Przybylski, M. (2002) Bees in Berkeley. Submitted to Fremontia.

  • Garrison, R.W. and Hafernik, J.E. (1981) Population structure of the rare damselfly Ischnura gemina (Kennedy) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Oecologia 48, 377–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafernik, J.E. and Garrison, R.W. (1986) Mating success and survival rate in a population of damselflies: Results at variance with theory? Am. Natural. 128, 353–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafernik, J.E. (1992) Threats to invertebrate biodiversity: Implications for conservation strategies. In Conservation biology: The theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management, (P.L. Fiedler and S.K. Jain, eds.), pp. 172–95. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafernik, J.E. and Reinhard, H. (1995) Butterflies of the bay:Winners and losers in San Francisco's urban jungle. Am. Butterflies 3, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, R. (2001) Reintroduction of Ischnura gemina (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) into Glen Canyon Park, San Francisco. Masters Thesis, San Francisco State University, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, P.B. and Dennis, R.L.H. (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiver. Conserv. 8, 1261–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., Murphy, D.D. and Ehrlich, P.R. (1988) Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a metapopulation model. Am. Natural. 132, 360–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway, D. (1995) Distribution of Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in northern California. Conserv. Biol. 9, 1634–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway, D. (1998) Effect of Argentine ant invasions on grounddwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116, 252–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A.Q. and Arnold, R.A. (1980) The Antioch Dunes - safe at last? Fremontia 8, 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, K.G. and Gordon, D.M. (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in northern California. Conserv. Biol. 11, 1242–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2000) Redlist of threatened species. (http://www.redlist.org/ search/details.php?species=39308)

  • Kareiva, P., Andelman, S., Doak, D., Elderd, B., Groom, M., Hoekstra, J., Hood, L., James, F., Lamoreux, J., LeBuhn, G., McCulloch, C., Regetz, J., Savage, L., Ruckelshaus, M., Skelly, D., Wilbur, H., Zamudio, K. and NCEAS HCP working group (1999) Using science in habitat conservation plans. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the American Institute of Biological Sciences. http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/nceas-web/ projects/97KAREI2/hcp-1999-01-14.pdf, May 13, 2002.

  • Kinzig, A.P. and Harte, J. (2000) Implications of endemics-area relationships for estimates of species extinctions. Ecology 81, 3305–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlov, M. (1996) Patterns of forest insect distribution within a large city: Lepidoptera in St. Petersburg, Russia. J. Biogeography 23, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launer, A.E., Murphy, D.D., Hoekstra, J.M. and Sparrow, H.R. (1992) The endangered Myrtle's silverspot butterfly: Present status and initial conservation planning. J. Res. Lepidoptera 31, 132–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, J.M. and Hafernik, J.E. (1992) Hybridization between two damselfly species (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) morphometric and genitalic differentiation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85, 662–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J.M. and Connor, E.F. (2003) Gardens - a haven or hindrance in butterfly conservation. Submitted to Conservation Biology.

  • Louda, S.M. (1998) Population growth of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on two species of native thistles in a prairie. Environ. Entomol. 27, 834–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, R.F. and Dahlsten, D.L. (1975) Natural decline of a pine needle scale [Chionaspis pinifoliae (Fitch)] outbreak at South Lake Tahoe, California, following cessation of adult mosquito control with malathion. Ecology 56, 893–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J.F., Hellmann, J.J., Boggs, C.L. and Ehrlich, P.R. (2002) Climate change hastens population extinction. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 6070–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, B.A., Wood, D.L., Storer, A.J., Svihra, P., Rizzo, D.M., Kelly, N.M. and Standiford, R. (2000) Oak mortality syndrome: Sudden death of oaks and tanoaks. Tree Notes Number 26, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

  • Murphy, D.D. (1988) The Kirby Canyon Conservation Agreement:A model for the resolution of land-use conflicts involving threatened invertebrates. Environ. Conserv. 15, 45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D.D., Freas, K.E. and Weiss, S.B. (1990) An environmentmetapopulation approach to population viability analysis for a threatened invertebrate. Conserv. Biol. 4, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resource Projects Inventory (2002) Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Project - Weed Control. http://www.ice.ucdavis. edu/nrpi/NRPIDescription.asp?ProjectPK=4524, April 29, 2002.

  • Nelson, M. (1999) Habitat conservation planning. Endang. Species Bull. 24, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuckols, M.S. and Connor, E.F. (1995) Do trees in urban or ornamental plantings receive more damage by insects than trees in natural forests? Ecol. Entomol. 20, 253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, J., Holopainen, J.K., Nerg, A. and Holopainen, T. (1996) Levels of damage to Scots pine and Norway spruce caused by needle miners along a SO2 gradient. Ecography 19, 229–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, P.A. (1979) Insects of American chestnut: Possible importance and conservation concern. In Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium, (W.L. MacDonald, F.C. Cech, J. Luchok, and C. Smith eds), pp. 83–5. Morgantown, WV, USA: West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, P.A. and Robinson, L. (1986) Lange's Metalmark Butter-fly. In Audubon wildlife report, pp. 911–16. New York: National Audubon Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J. (1996) Existing Land Use in 1995: Data for Bay Area Counties and Cities. Oakland, CA: Association of Bay Area Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.A. (1992) Recent colonization of the San Francisco Bay Area, California, by exotic moths (Lepidoptera: Tineoidea, Gelechioidea, Torticoidea, Pyraloidea). Pan-Pacific Entomol. 68, 105–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.A. and Parker, M.W. (1993) Lange's Metalmark: Apodemia mormo langei Comstock, In Conservation biology of lycaenidae (butterflies), (T.R. New, ed.), pp. 116–19. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, No. 8. Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A.S. (1995) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, R.M., Benzien, M. and Opler, P. (1981) Insect conservation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26, 233–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J.M., Rejmanek, M. and Hunter, J.C. (1998) Characteristics of the exotic flora of California. Fremontia 26, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentz, D.C. (1977) A new and apparently extinct katydid from Antioch sand dunes. Entomol. News 88, 241–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman, J.K. and Connor, E.F. (2003) The effect of urbanization on the quality of remnant habitats for leaf-mining Lepidoptera of Quercus agrifolia. Ecography, in press.

  • Rizzo D.M., Garbelotto, M., Davidson, J.M., Slaughter, G.W. and Koike, S.T. (2002) Phytophthora ramorum as the cause of extensive mortality of Quercus spp. and Lithocarpus densiflorus in California. Plant Dis. 86, 205–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N.J., Barton, K.E. and Gordon, D.M. (2001) Long-term dynamics of the distribution of the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant taxa in northern California. Oecologia 127, 123–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (2002) The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Diver. Distrib. 8, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, M.R., Hails, R.S., Gilbert, M. and Foggo, A. (1998) Horse chestnut scale (Pulvinaria regalis) (Homoptera: Coccidae) and urban host tree environment. Ecology 79, 1503–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J. (1990) Bay Area butterflies: The distribution and natural history of San Francisco region Rhopalocera. 307 pp. Masters thesis: California State University, Hayward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilden, J.W. (1965) Butterflies of the San Francisco Bay Region. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2002) Thistle, Suisun. http://ecos.fws.gov/servlet/SpeciesProfile?spcode=Q0FC,May14, 2002.

  • van Rensburg, L., Kruger, G.H., Ubbink, B., Scholes, M.C. and Peacock, J. (1997) A phytocentric perspective of Asterolecanium quercicola Bouche infestation on Quercus robur L. trees along an urbanization gradient. South African J. Bot. 63, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P.S. (1987) Distribution of the introducted Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S.B. (1993) The San Bruno Elfin, Incisalia mossii baysensis (Brown). In Conservation biology of Lycaenidae (butterflies), (T.R. New ed.), pp. 141–3. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, No. 8. Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhere, G.F. (2002) Adaptive management in habitat conservation plans. Conserv. Biol. 16, 20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1992) The diversity of life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.C. and Pullin, A.S. (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: The importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodiv. Conserv. 11, 1451–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward F. Connor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Connor, E.F., Hafernik, J., Levy, J. et al. Insect Conservation in an Urban Biodiversity Hotspot: The San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Insect Conservation 6, 247–259 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426727504

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426727504

Navigation