Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mate Choice and Toxicity in Two Species of Leaf Beetles with Different Types of Chemical Defense

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence for the use of defensive compounds for sexual purposes is scarce, even though sexual selection might have some importance for the evolution of defensive traits. This study investigates the effect of defense-related traits and body size on mating success in two sister species of leaf beetle differing in their type of chemical defense. Oreina gloriosa produces autogenous cardenolides, whereas O. cacaliae sequesters pyrrolizidine alkaloids from its food plant. Larger O. gloriosa males with more toxin or higher toxin concentration had a mating advantage, likely due to direct or indirect female choice. In the laboratory, particular pairings recurred repeatedly in this species, indicating mate fidelity. O. gloriosa females were also subject to sexual selection, possibly by male choice, because larger females and those with higher toxin concentration mated more readily and more often. In O. cacaliae, in contrast, sexual selection for toxicity and body size was not detected, or at best was much weaker. Because toxicity is heritable in O. gloriosa but environment-dependent in O. cacaliae, individuals of the former species could be choosing well-defended partners with “good genes.” Our study suggests that sexual selection may contribute to the maintenance of heritable defensive traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano, T., Nishida, R., Kuwahara, Y., and Fukami, H. 1999. Pharmacophagous acquisition of clerodendrins by the turnip sawfly (Athalia rosae ruficornis) and their role in the mating behaviour. Chemoecology 9:145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. and Iwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. and Wade, M. J. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications. Evolution 38:720–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. and Wade, M. J. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38:709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attygalle, A. B., Meinwald, J., Liebherr, J. K., and Eisner, T. 1991. Sexual dimorphism in the defensive secretion of a carabid beetle. Experientia 47:296–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. and MøLLER, A. P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn, W. U., Reuter, M., Ward, P. I., and Barbour, A. D. 1999. Correcting for sampling bias in quantitative measures of selection when fitness is discrete. Evolution 53:286–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: A synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76:305–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, D. M. 1992. The evolution of unpalatability and the cost of chemical defense in insects, pp. 216–244, in B. D. Roitberg and M. B. Isman (Eds.). Insect Chemical Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, E. D. and Janzen, F. J. 1996. On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50:437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, E. D., Moore, A. J., and Janzen, F. J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, L. P. 1984. Chemical defence in butterflies, pp. 109–134, in R. I. Vane-Wright, and P. R. Ackery (Eds.). The Biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, L. P., Seiber, J. N., Nelson, C. J., Lynch, S. P., Hoggard, M. P., and Cohen, J. A. 1984. Plant-determined variation in cardenolide content and thin-layer chromatography profiles of monarch butterflies Danaus-plexippus reared on milkweed plants in California. J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1823–1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E. J. A. and Birkhead, T. R. 1998. Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56:1311–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobler, S., and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1994. Production of cardenolides versus sequestration of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in larvae of Oreina species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 20:555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussourd, D. E., Harvis, C. A., Meinwald, J., and Eisner, T. 1991. Pheromonal advertisement of a nuptial gift by a male moth (Utetheisa ornathrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9224–9227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. A. and Seabrook, W. D. 1997. Evidence for an airborne sex pheromone in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Can. Entomol. 129:667–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggenberger, F. and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1992. Genetic component of variation in chemical defense of Oreina gloriosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1375–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggenberger, F. and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1993a. Physiological effects on variation in chemical defense of Oreina gloriosa (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). J. Chem. Ecol. 19:395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggenberger, F. and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1993b. Production of cardenolides in different life stages of the Chrysomelid beetle Oreina gloriosa. J. Insect Physiol. 39:751–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euw, J. V., Fishelson, L., Parsons, J. A., Reichstein, T., and Rothschild, M. 1967. Cardenolides (heart poisons) in a grasshopper feeding on milkweeds. Nature 214:35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, D. T. and BAiley, W. J. 1999. Female–female competition in katydids: Sexual selection for increased sensitivity to a male signal? Evolution 53:546–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y. and Tsubaki, Y. 1992. Variation in spermatophore size in the armyworm Pseudaletia separata (Lepidoptera Noctuidae) in relation to rearing density. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 27:39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honek, A. 1993. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: A general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isman, M. B. 1977. Dietary influence of cardenolides on larval growth and development of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. J. Insect Physiol. 23:1183–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isman, M. B., Duffey, S. S., and Scudder, G. G. E. 1977. Variation in cardenolide content of the lygaeid bugs Oncopeltus fasciatus and Lygaeus kalmii kalmii and of their milkweed hosts (Asclepias spp.) in central California. J. Chem. Ecol. 3:613–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hill, C. E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P., and Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, G. A. and Luche, W. H. 1994. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. G. Evers. a(Ed.). 14. Krefeld. pp. 403.

  • Micholitsch, T., Kruegel, P., and Pass, G. 2000. Insemination and fertilization in the seed bug Lygaeus simulans (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 97:13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, R. and Fukami, H. 1990. Sequestration of distasteful compounds by some pharmacophagous insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J. M., Duffey, S., and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1990. Toxins in chrysomelid beetles: Possible evolutionary sequence from de novo synthesis to derivation from food-plant chemicals. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J. M., Ehmke, A., Eggenberger, F., Rowell-Rahier, M., and Hartmann, T. 1992. Chemical defense in chrysomelid leaf beetles: Storage of host derived pyrrolizidine alkaloids versus de novo synthesized cardenolides. Naturwissenshaften 79:521–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A., and Krupa, J. J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: Water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell-Rahier, M., Witte, L., Ehmke, A., Hartmann, T., and Pasteels, J. M. 1991. Sequestration of plant pyrrolizidine alkaloids by Chrysomelid beetles and selective transfer into the defensive secretions. Chemoecology 2:41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D. I. 1989. Sperm competition in the water strider Gerris remigis. Anim. Behav. 38:631–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruther, J., Reinecke, A., Thiemann, K., Tolasch, T., Francke, W., and Hilker, M. 2000. Mate finding in the forest cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani, mediated by volatiles from plants and females. Physiol. Entomol. 25:172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooneveld, H., Van Der Berg, A. A., and Van Nierop, S. 1992. Defense glands of the Colorado potato beetle: Evidence for neural regulation. Proc. Exp. Appl. Entomol. 3:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S., Mbata, G. N., Cork, A., and Ramaswamy, S. B. 1999. Sex pheromone of Callosobruchus subinnotatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2715–2727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigo, J. R. and Brown, K. S. 1990. Variation of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Ithomiinae: A comparative study between species feeding on Apocynaceae and Solanaceae. Chemoecology 1:22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oycke, S., Breakman, J. C., Daloze, D., and Pasteels, J. M. 1987. Cardenolide biosynthesis in chrysomelid beeteles. Experientia 43:460–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring-Wilde, J. 1996. Mate choice and competition in the barklouse Lepinotus patruelis (Psocoptera: Trogiidae): The effect of diet quality and sex ratio. J. Insect Behav. 9:599–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R. H. and Poston, J. 1996: Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53:205–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LEAE, Institut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2007, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Estelle Labeyrie & Martine Rahier

  2. Zoologisches Museum, Universität Zürich-Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland

    Wolf U. Blanckenhorn

Authors
  1. Estelle Labeyrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martine Rahier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estelle Labeyrie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labeyrie, E., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Rahier, M. Mate Choice and Toxicity in Two Species of Leaf Beetles with Different Types of Chemical Defense. J Chem Ecol 29, 1665–1680 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024283016219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024283016219

Search

Navigation