Skip to main content
Log in

An investigation of communicative competence in an upper-secondary class where using graphics calculators was routine

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an exploration of conversation in a single episode of whole-class work in a Year 12,all girls' Calculus class. The analysis is cast in terms of Habermasian communicative competence, which requires students to evidence critical thinking and the ability to express their views. Favourable learning outcomes in the class are explained by the teacher's mode of questioning, cooperative endeavour by students, the instructional sequence and use of technologies including the graphics calculator. The circumstances of problematic outcomes are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R. and Tarule, J.M.: 1986, Women's Ways of Knowing, Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N.W.: 1993, Evolving Conceptions of Ethical Practice in Interpretative Research, keynote address at the 1993 International Conference on Interpretative Research in Science Education. National Taiwan University.

  • Cobb, P.: 1998, ‘Analyzing the mathematical learning of the classroom community: The case of statistical data analysis’, in A. Oliver and K. Newstead (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol 1, South Africa, pp. 33-48.

  • Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K. and Whitenack, J.: 1997, ‘Reflective discourse and collective reflection’, Journal of Research into Mathematics Education28(3), 258-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E. and McNeal, B.: 1992, ‘Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis’, American Educational Research Journal29(3), 573-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. and Manion, L.: 1994, Research Methods in Education(4th ed.), Routlege, London.

  • Fairclough, N.: 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P.A.: 2000, ‘Katie thought she couldn't do it but now she knows she can’, Educational Studies in Mathematics43(3), 225-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P. and Taylor, P.: 2000, ‘Emergence of mathematical (in)competence and identity’, in J. Bana and A. Chapman (eds.), Mathematics Education beyond 2000: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia, Perth, Australia, pp. 65-71.

  • Forster, P., Taylor, P. and Davis, C.: 2002a, ‘“One hundred and sixty geckos and one without a tail”: Wit and student empowerment when class discussion is centred on the display from a student's graphics calculator’, Australian Senior Mathematics Journal16(1), 56-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P., Taylor, P. and Davis, C.: 2002b, ‘The sherpa-student role with a graphics calculator: Empowering or disempowering?’, in B. Barton, K.C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch and M.O.J. Thomas (eds.), Mathematics Education in the South Pacific, Proceedings of the 25rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 276-284.

  • Gumperz, J.J.: 1995, ‘Mutual inferencing in conversation’, in I. Markova, C. Graumann, and K. Foppa (eds.), Mutualities in Dialogue, Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp. 101-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershowitz, R., Schwarz, B.B. and Dreyfus, T.: 2001, ‘Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education32(2), 195-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H.: 1979, Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M.: 1998, Designing Communities, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 2000, ‘Steering (dis)course between metaphors and rigor: Using focal analysis to investigate an emergence of mathematical objects’, Journal for Research inMathematics Education31(3), 296-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.C.: 1996, ‘Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom’, Educational Studies in Mathematics31, 151-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.C.: 1998, ‘Constructivism: Value added’, in B. Fraser and K. Tobin (eds.), The International Book of Science Education, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 1111-1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. and Mason, J.: 1998, Questions and Prompts for Mathematical Thinking, Association of Teacher of Mathematics, Derby, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.: 1990, A Critical Theory of Education: Habermas and our Children's Future, Teachers College, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.: 1992, Critical Theory and Classroom Talk, Multilingual Matters, Adelaide, South Australia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forster, P.A., Taylor, P.C. An investigation of communicative competence in an upper-secondary class where using graphics calculators was routine. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 57–77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023676010819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023676010819

Navigation