Abstract
In earlier studies it was shown that two domain-specific variates of belief in a just world, namely belief in immanent justice and belief in ultimate justice concerning severe illness, differ systematically and significantly. Only immanent justice leads to accusation and derogation of innocent victims while ultimate justice is concordant with positive evaluations of victims and helping behavior. With regard to the research project “Justice as a Problem within Reunified Germany” (GiP, from the German “Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem”), two new scales were developed for purposes of measuring general belief in immanent and ultimate justice. Using a sample of 929 West Germans and 1,275 East Germans, some of the correlation patterns found in earlier studies could be replicated. For example, immanent justice did correlate with draconian judgments (the proneness to strict and severe judgments), while ultimate justice was associated with mildness. Only ultimate justice correlated with existential guilt about the underprivileged. Beside this confirmation of earlier findings, new correlation patterns were revealed. For example, only immanent justice correlated with the equity principle, whereas ultimate justice corresponded to the need and equality principles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ambrosio, A. L., and Sheehan, S. E. (1991). The just world belief and the AIDS epidemic. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 6: 163-170.
Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., and Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. J. Pers. 59: 263-280.
Bush, A., Krebs, D. L., and Carpendale, J. I. (1993). The structural consistency of moral judgments about AIDS. J. Genetic Psychol. 154: 167-175.
Connors, J., and Heaven, P. C. (1990). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. J. Soc. Psychol. 130: 559-560.
Dalbert, C., and Katona-Sallay, H. (1996). The “belief in a just world” construct in Hungary. J. Cross Cultural Psychol. 27: 293-314.
Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 28: 365-384.
Glennon, F., and Joseph, S. (1993). Just world beliefs, self esteem, and attitudes towards homosexuals with AIDS. Psychol. Rep. 72: 584-586.
Harper, D. J., and Manasse, P. R. (1992). The just world and the third world: British explanations for poverty abroad. J. Soc. Psychol. 132: 783-785.
Kerr, N. L., and Kurtz, S. T. (1977). Effects of a victim's suffering and respectability on mock juror judgments: Further evidence on the just world theory. Rep. Res. Soc. Psychol. 8: 42-56.
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1: 355-360.
Lerner, M. J. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In Macaulay, J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 205-228.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203-210.
MacLean, M. J., and Shown, S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. Int. J. Aging Human Devel. 26: 249-260.
Maes, J. (1992). Konstruktion und Analyse eines mehrdimensionalen Gerechte-Welt-Fragebogens. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral,” Nr. 64). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
Maes, J. (1994). Drakonität als Personmerkmal: Entwicklung und erste Erprobung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Urteilsstrenge (Drakonität) versus Milde. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 78). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
Maes, J. (1995). To control and to be controlled—presentation of a two-ways-questionnaire for the assessment of beliefs in control. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 11,Supplement No. 1, 8-9.
Maes, J. (1998a). Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 9-40.
Maes, J. (1998b). Befunde zur Unterscheidung von immanenter und ultimativer Gerechtigkeit: 2. Ergebnisse aus einer Untersuchung zur Verantwortungsübernahme für den Aufbau an ostdeutschen Hochschulen. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 112). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Life Crises and the Experience of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 133-161.
Montada, L., Dalbert, C., Reichle, B., and Schmitt, M. (1985). Urteile über Gerechtigkeit, “existentielle Schuld” und Strategien der Schuldabwehr. In Oser, F., Althof, W., and Garz, D. (eds.), Moralische Zugänge zum Menschen-Zugänge zum moralischen Menschen, München, Kindt, pp. 205-225.
Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125-143.
Montada, L., and Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Soc. Just. Res. 3: 313-344.
Montada, L., and Schneider, A. (1991). Justice and prosocial commitments. In Montada, L., and Bierhoff, H. W. (eds.), Altruism in social systems, Hogrefe, Toronto, pp. 58-81.
Montada, L., Schneider, A., and Reichle, B. (1988). Emotionen und Hilfsbereitschaft. In Bierhoff, H. W., and Montada, L. (eds.), Bedingungen der Hilfsbereitschaft, Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp. 130-153.
Olkin, I. (1967). Correlations revisited. In Stanley, J. C. (ed.), Improving experimental design and statistical analysis, Rand McNally, Chicago.
O'Quin, K., and Vogler, C. C. (1990). Use of the Just World Scale with prison inmates: A methodological note. Perceptual and Motor Skills 70: 395-400.
Piaget, J. (1932). Le jugement moral chez l'enfant. Alcan, Paris.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery. J. Soc. Issues 29(4): 73-93.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 65-89.
Rayn, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. Pantheon, New York.
Schmitt, M., Kilders, M., Mosle, A., Müller, L., Pfrengle, A., Rabenberg, H., Schott, F., Stolz, J., Suda, U., Williams, M., and Zimmermann, G. (1991). Gerechte-Welt-Glaube, Gewinn und Verlust: Rechtfertigung oder ausgleichende Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 22: 37-45.
Schmitt, M., Maes, J., and Schmal, A. (1995). Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Kovariate. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 82). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
Schmitt, M., Maes, J., and Schmal, A. (1997). Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Analyse der Meßeigenschaften von Meßinstrumenten für Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 105). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
Schmitt, M., and Montada, L. (1982). Determinanten erlebter Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 13: 32-44.
Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., and Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Soc. Just. Res. 8: 385-407.
Schwinger, T. (1980). Gerechte Güter-Verteilungen: Entscheidungen zwischen drei Prinzipien. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Gerechtigkeit und soziale Interaktion (pp. 107-140). Bern: Huber.
Sherman, M. F., Smith, R., and Cooper, R. (1982). Reactions toward the dying: The effects of a patient's illness and respondents' belief in a just world. Omega J. Death Dying 13(2): 173-189.
Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., and Robbins, M. A. (1982). The relationships of observer characteristics to beliefs in the causal responsibility of victims of sexual assaults. Human Relations. 35: 321-330.
Weir, J. A., and Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors' verdicts in a rape case. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20: 901-919.
Zucker, G. S., and Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23: 925-943.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maes, J., Schmitt, M. More on Ultimate and Immanent Justice: Results from the Research Project “Justice as a Problem within Reunified Germany”. Social Justice Research 12, 65–78 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022039624976
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022039624976