Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Blocked Versus Random Presentation and Semantic Relatedness of Stimulus Words on Response to a Modified Stroop Task Among Social Phobics

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies of the modified Stroop Color-Naming Task with social phobics have demonstrated increased latencies for the color-naming of social threat words in comparison to neutral or physical threat words. However, these effects could be partially due to differences in the semantic relatedness of the words in these various categories and/or the blocked format (i.e., all words of one type presented sequentially) in which words have been presented. To examine these issues, color-naming latencies of individuals with social phobia to social threat, semantically related neutral, and unrelated neutral words were examined in both blocked and randomly intermixed formats. Significant differences in color-naming were found for word stimuli presented in the blocked format only. In the blocked format, social phobics were significantly slower to color-name social threat words than related neutral words and significantly slower to color-name related neutral words than unrelated neutral words. Color-naming latencies also increased across trials regardless of word type. There were no effects of word type in the random format. Thus, both presentation format and semantic priming, as well as threat value, may have contributed to color-naming interference for the social threat words. Possible interpretations of our findings along with implications for future Stroop research in persons with social phobia are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J. S. (1994). Identity primes produce facilitation in a colour naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 975–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiday, K. L., McNally, R. J., & Zeitlin, S. B. (1992). Cognitive processing of trauma cues in rape victims with posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloitre, M., Heimberg, R. G., Holt, C. S., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1992). Reaction time to threat stimuli in panic disorder and social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 2, 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgleish, T. (1995). Performance on the emotional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert, and control subjects: A comparison of computer and card presentation formats. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 341–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgleish, T., & Watts, F. N. (1990). Biases of attention and memory in disorders of anxiety and depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 589–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ruiter, C., & Brosschot, J. F. (1994). The emotional Stroop interference effect in anxiety: Attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo, P. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1988). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule, Revised (ADIS-R). Albany, NY: Graywind Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo, P. A., Moras, K., Barlow, D. H., Rapee, R. M., & Brown, T. A. (1993). Reliability of DSM-III-R anxiety disorder categories: Using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule—Revised (ADIS-R). Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., Margraf, J., Davies, S., & Roth, W. T. (1988). Selective processing of threat cues in subjects with panic attacks. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Feske, U., Murdock, T. B., Kozak, M. J., & McCarthy, P. R. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Juster, H. R., Hope, D. A., & Mattia, J. I. (1995). Cognitive behavioral group treatment for social phobia: Description, case presentation and empirical support. In M. B. Stein (Ed.), Social phobia: Clinical and research perspectives (pp. 293–321). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., Hope, D. A., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D. A., Rapee, R. M., Heimberg, R. G., & Dombeck, M. J. (1990). Representation of the self in social phobia: Vulnerability to social threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspi, S. P., McNally, R. J., & Amir, N. (1995). Cognitive processing of emotional information in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, A. M., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshelman, S. E., Wittchen, H., & Kendler, K. S. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, E. H., & van den Hout, M. A. (1994). Cognitive avoidance and attentional bias: Causal relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. (1991). Clinical anxiety and the selective encoding of threatening information. International Review of Psychiatry, 3, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17, 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., Williams, R. M., & Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & Klug, F. (1993). Emotionality and interference with colour-naming in anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattia, J. I., Heimberg, R. G., & Hope, D. A. (1993). The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1989). Development and validation of measures of social phobia, scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Unpublished manuscript.

  • McNally, R. J., Kaspi, S. P., Riemann, B. C., & Zeitlin, S. B. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 398–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Kim E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., Louro, C. E., Lukach, B. M., & Kim, E. (1992). Cognitive processing of emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. W., Ries, B. J., Taylor, L. J., Boone, M. L., Carter, L. E., Turk, C. L., & Lewin, M. R., (1995). Comparison of social phobia subtypes using Stroop tests. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 9, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Williams, R., & Mathews, A. (1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Kentish, J., & Bradley, B. P. (1993). Effects of anxiety and awareness on colour-identification latencies for emotional words. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Eysenck, M., & May, J. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Artifact, processing priorities or attentional search? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews A., & Weinman, J. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: A replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G. C., & Spira, J. L. (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated System for IBM PC compatibles. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20, 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, F. R., Johnson, J., Hornig, C. D., Liebowitz, M. R., & Weissman, M. M. (1992). Social phobia: Comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiologic sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, W. P. (1939). Shipley-Institute of Living Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment: Manual for directions and scoring. Hartford, CT: Institute of Living.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. E. (1974). Association, directionality and stimulus encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. P., Sharrock R., & Trezise, L. (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holle, C., Neely, J.H. & Heimberg, R.G. The Effects of Blocked Versus Random Presentation and Semantic Relatedness of Stimulus Words on Response to a Modified Stroop Task Among Social Phobics. Cognitive Therapy and Research 21, 681–697 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021860324879

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021860324879

Navigation