Skip to main content
Log in

A Study of Gender Differences in Autobiographical Memory: Broken Down by Age and Sex

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from 40 older adults who produced autobiographical memories to word cues and to the request to list five important memories, and data from 60 older adults who answered factual multiple-choice questions for events spread across their lives, were analyzed for gender differences. In spite of considerable statistical power, there were no gender differences in the distribution of autobiographical memories over the lifespan, in the distribution of important memories, in various ratings provided to these memories, or in the distribution of knowledge for events. The only gender difference found was that men performed better on factual questions about current events and baseball. Thus, counter to what might be expected from Darwinian theory and some behavioral data, gender differences were minimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Auriat, N. (1992). Autobiographical memory and survey methodology: Furthering the bridge between two disciplines. In M. A. Conway, D. C. Rubin, H. Spinnler, & W. A. Wagenaar (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on autobiographical memory (pp. 295-312). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P. (1983). The cognitive map of a city: Fifty years of learning and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 125-163). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P. (1989). The laboratory and the ecology: Supplementary sources of data for memory research. In L. W. Poon. D. C. Rubin, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 73-83). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P. (1998). Maintenance of knowledge: Findings, methods, and issues. Unpublished Mmanuscript.

  • Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 20-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shakhar, G., & Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 23-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 165-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botwinick, J., & Storandt, M. (1974). Memory, related functions and age. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., & Davidson, G. (1984). Salient childhood memories. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 101-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz, H. F., & Schiffman, H. (1974). Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 517-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, M. J., & Crawley, R. A. (1998). The offset of childhood amnesia: Memory for events that occurred before age 3. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 22-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. M., & Lawrence, R. (1984). Autobiographical memory across the lifespan. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 692-699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R. (1998). Gendered narratives: elaboration, structure, and emotion in parent-child reminiscing across the preschool years. In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrmann, D. Bruce, J. D. Read, D. G. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Autobiographical memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 79-103). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, H. C., & Holding, D. H. (1977). Personal memories at different ages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 527-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1950). Screen memories. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), Collected papers (Vol. 5, pp. 47-69). London, England: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1899)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., & Pines, A. (1991). Sex differences in gender-related childhood memories. Sex Roles, 25, 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2, 149-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman, E. S., & Berkowitz, M. (1993). Test-item type: What students prefer and why. College Student Journal. 27, 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L. G., & Bäckman, L. (1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 25, 801-811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, J., Trussell, J., & Larsen, U. (1986). Age and infertility. Science, 233, 1389-1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, M. K. (1994). Earliest recollections of childhood: A demographic analysis. Cognition, 52, 55-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinz, E. J., & Salthouse, T. A. (1998). Is age kinder to females than to males? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 56-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 467-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A., & Swanson, K. L. (1993). Field and observer modes of remembering. Memory, 1, 169-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., & Holmberg, D. (1990). Recounting the past: Gender differences in the recall of events in the history of a close relationship. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 6, Self-inference processes (pp. 135-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (1982). On the retention function for autobiographical memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., Groth, L., & Goldsmith, D. (1984). Olfactory cuing of autobiographical memory. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 493-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A., & Poon, L. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory & Cognition, 26, 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., & Schulkind, M. D. (1997a). Distribution of important and word cued autobiographical memories in 20-, 35-, and 70-year-old-adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 524-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. & Schulkind, M. D. (1997b). Properties of word cues for autobiographical memory. Psychological Reports, 81, 47-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., & Schulkind, M. D. (1997c). The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 25, 859-866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734-760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., Wetzler, S. E., & Nebes, R. D. (1986). Autobiographical memories across the lifespan. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 202-221). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrauf, R. W., & Rubin, D. C. (1998). Bilingual autobiographical memory in older adult immigrants: A test of cognitive explanations of the reminiscence bump and the linguistic encoding of memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 437-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, J. J., & Thompson, C. P. (1990). Reconstructing the dates of events: Gender differences in accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 371-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. P,, Skowronski, J. J., Larsen, S. F., & Betz, A. (1996). Autobiographical memory: Remembering what and remembering when. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, S. (1948). The frequency and affective character of childhood memories. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 62(4, Whole No. 291).

  • Wester, A. (1995). The importance of the item format with respect to gender differences in test performance: A study of openformat items in the DTM test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 335-346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Rubin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubin, D.C., Schulkind, M.D. & Rahhal, T.A. A Study of Gender Differences in Autobiographical Memory: Broken Down by Age and Sex. Journal of Adult Development 6, 61–71 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021676309064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021676309064

Navigation